Skip to main content

Conclusion and Discussion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Healthcare Reform in China
  • 790 Accesses

Abstract

As a conclusion to this book, the Chinese population is categorized into three subgroups that are likely to represent the demand side of three very different healthcare markets in the future:

  • A very disadvantaged population with a very low income that cannot afford healthcare access, even for basic healthcare, without the support and intervention of the state. This population is composed of those who benefit from Medical Assistance but also who are eligible for the two main public insurance schemes, namely the New Rural Cooperative Medical Insurance scheme and the Urban Residence Basic Medical Insurance scheme. This population is mainly from rural areas but with a growing element from urban locations;

  • An intermediate level of population with income sufficient to afford access to basic healthcare but who cannot afford the whole package of healthcare offered. This population has, over the past three decades, experienced an amazing change in their healthcare quality preference. The level of quality required to satisfy their demand has increased highly. In the 1980s, considered here as the initial context, they were satisfied with a poor level of quality for almost free access. Nowadays, they look for qualified and trained physicians working in well-equipped hospitals. This population is willing to pay a substantial healthcare cost to get the level of quality it rates as necessary. For this population, severe pathology or chronic disease can lead to impoverishment and deterioration in the quality of life;

  • A high-income population able to subscribe to a private insurance policy. This population mostly lives in urban locations. On the one hand, the level of quality requested to satisfy this audience is high. On the other hand, this population can afford to access a certain level of healthcare without the support of public health insurance. This population is the one targeted by commercial private insurance companies. These firms offer them supplementary insurance in addition to the public health insurance package.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jeffrey Moe, Shu Chen, and Andrea Taylor, “Initial Findings in a Landscaping Study of Healthcare Delivery Innovation in China,” IPIHD (International Partnership for Innovative Healthcare Delivery) Research Report 14-01, 2014; Xuezheng Qin, Lixing Li, and Chee-Ruey Hsieh, “Too Few Doctors or Too Low Wages? Labor Supply of Healthcare Professionals in China,” China Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2013.

  2. 2.

    “Industry Report, Healthcare: China,” The Economist Intelligence Unit, August 2014.

  3. 3.

    The proportion of GDP spent on healthcare was 4% in 1990. It is 17% in the United States.

  4. 4.

    “600,000 Chinese Doctors Sign Petition against Hospital Violence,” China Daily, 19 July 2015. www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-07/19/content_21326495.htm. Accessed September 2017.

  5. 5.

    During my multiple visits to Tie III hospitals in Beijing and Shanghai, I also observed that police were routinely stationed at the entrance of every hospital complex.

  6. 6.

    To some observers, the turning point for the reforms incorporating more aspects of social security was the 2006 speech by Party General Secretary Hu Jintao, where he introduced the notion of a “harmonious society”. Joe C.B. Leung and Yuebin Xi, China’s Social Welfare, Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2015.

  7. 7.

    W. Yip, W. Hsiao, W. Chen, S. Hu, J. Ma, and A. Maynard, “Early Appraisal of China’s Huge and Complex Health-care Reforms,” Lancet, Vol. 379, No. 9818, 2012, pp. 833–842.

  8. 8.

    W. Yip, W. Hsiao, W. Chen, S. Hu, J. Ma, and A. Maynard, “Early Appraisal of China’s Huge and Complex Health-care Reforms,” Lancet, Vol. 379, No. 9818, 2012, pp. 833–842.

  9. 9.

    J.L. Hougaard, L.P. Osterdal, and Y. Yu, “The Chinese Healthcare System: Structure, Problems and Challenges,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1–13.

  10. 10.

    Q. Long, L. Xu, H. Bekedam, and S. Tang, “Changes in Health Expenditures in China in 2000s: Has the Health System Reform Improved Affordability?” International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol. 12, 2013, p. 40.

  11. 11.

    World Bank, “Urban China: Toward Efficient, Inclusive, and Sustainable Urbanization,” Development Research Centre of the State Council, Source MoH, 2011.

Bibliography

  • Hougaard, J.L., L.P. Osterdal, and Y. Yu, “The Chinese Healthcare System: Structure, Problems and Challenges,” Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2011, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Industry Report, Healthcare: China,” The Economist Intelligence Unit, August 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Q., L. Xu, H. Bekedam, and S. Tang, “Changes in Health Expenditures in China in 2000s: Has the Health System Reform Improved Affordability?” International Journal for Equity in Health, Vol. 12, 2013, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Jeffrey, Shu Chen, and Andrea Taylor, “Initial Findings in a Landscaping Study of Healthcare Delivery Innovation in China,” IPIHD (International Partnership for Innovative Healthcare Delivery) Research Report 14-01, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Xuezheng, Lixing Li, and Chee-Ruey Hsieh, “Too Few Doctors or Too Low Wages? Labor Supply of Healthcare Professionals in China,” China Economic Review, Vol. 24, No. 1, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, “Urban China: Toward Efficient, Inclusive, and Sustainable Urbanization,” Development Research Centre of the State Council, Source MoH, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yip, W., W. Hsiao, W. Chen, S. Hu, J. Ma, and A. Maynard, “Early Appraisal of China’s Huge and Complex Health-care Reforms,” Lancet, Vol. 379, No. 9818, 2012, pp. 833–842.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Milcent, C. (2018). Conclusion and Discussion. In: Healthcare Reform in China. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69736-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69736-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69735-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69736-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics