Skip to main content

A Coherent Approach to Macroeconomic Theory and Economic Policies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics
  • 629 Accesses

Abstract

Philip Arestis, in this chapter entitled ‘A Coherent Approach to Macroeconomic Theory and Economic Policies’, offers a new approach to macroeconomics, which focuses on the notion that there is often inadequacy of aggregate demand relative to what would be required for full employment of the factors of production. The level and distribution of productive capacity can often be inadequate to underpin full employment. Consequently, and under such circumstances, distributional effects are paramount and should be seriously taken on board in the analysis and policies; and such effects are actually considered in this contribution. Economic policies are thereby very relevant and important. We briefly summarise the theoretical framework that underpins the relevant economic policies before we turn our attention to the latter themselves. We suggest that in addition to the well-known economic policies, namely, fiscal and monetary policies, and of equal importance, co-ordination of them, two new, relevant and important policy dimensions emerge as paramount: distributional effects and financial stability. We also discuss briefly current ‘unorthodox’ monetary policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It should be noted that this contribution goes well beyond the New Consensus Macroeconomics (NCM) and its policy implication, namely, inflation targeting (see also Arestis 2007, 2009, 2010).

  2. 2.

    The five blocks discussed in Sect. 2 were originally suggested in Arestis (2013)—see, also, Arestis (2010) and Arestis and Sawyer (2010). The current contribution, though, relies more extensively on the relevant theoretical framework and economic policies.

  3. 3.

    There are of course exceptions as highlighted below. See, for example, Onaran and Galanis (2013) and Lavoie and Stockhammer (2013).

  4. 4.

    It is interesting to note that at the G20 meeting in Hangzhou, China (September 2016), the managing director of the IMF praised the group’s commitment to reduce excessive inequality and to ensure growth would be widely shared.

  5. 5.

    See, also, The Economist (2014) where it is argued that redistribution does help to increase national income.

  6. 6.

    An important aspect on this score is the change in labour markets over the recent years, where the role of trade unions has diminished substantially. Re-strengthening the role of trade unions is crucial in terms of reducing inequality.

  7. 7.

    Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/financialstability/pages/fpc/default.aspx

  8. 8.

    Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financial_Conduct_Authority

  9. 9.

    Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/PRA/Pages/default.aspx

  10. 10.

    The Dodd-Frank Act of July 2010 in the USA (especially its relevant rule that does not allow banks to use secured deposits for speculative activities), the UK Vickers Report (which proposes ring-fencing retail bank deposits), the European Liikanen Report (which proposes ring-fencing the commercial bank activities), the IMF proposal to tax banks and the Basle III proposal to increase banks’ equity in relation to their risk-weighted assets (RWA) are additional proposals around the globe.

  11. 11.

    Available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/speech/yellen20170825a.htm

  12. 12.

    Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2017/html/ecb.sp170524_1.en.html

  13. 13.

    However, see above on the slow progress on the financial stability ‘new’ objective.

  14. 14.

    The Bank of Japan pledged (end of September 2016) to overshoot its 2% inflation target and has also adopted a new tool to achieve it. This is to cap the ten-year bond yields at zero, in addition to its quantitative and qualitative and negative interest rate policies.

  15. 15.

    The ECB president has also argued at the conference of the European Systemic Risk Board in Frankfurt (available at: https://www.esrb.europa.eu/news/speeches/date/2016/html/sp160922.en.html) that the euro-area banks have become too big relative to the needs of the economy. Bank lending should flow to productive projects if the economy is to prosper. But bank lending in the euro area tends to be procyclical: growing too fast in the upswing and insufficiently in the downswing. Thereby banks in the euro area have not been helpful to the economy in the aftermath of the GFC.

References

  • Angelini, P., Nery, S., & Panetta, F. (2012). Monetary and macroprudential policies (Working paper series no. 1449). Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2007). What is the new consensus in macroeconomics? In P. Arestis (Ed.), Is there a new consensus in macroeconomics? (pp. 22–42). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2009). New consensus macroeconomics and Keynesian critique. In E. Hein, T. Niechoj, & E. Stockhammer (Eds.), Macroeconomic policies on shaky foundations – Whither mainstream economics? (pp. 165–185). Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2010). Economic policies after the new consensus macroeconomics. In S. Dullien, E. Hein, A. Truger, & T. van Treeck (Eds.), The world economy in crisis – The return of Keynesianism? (pp. 271–294). Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2012). Fiscal policy: A strong macroeconomic role. Review of Keynesian Economics, 1(1), 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2013). Economic theory and policy: A coherent post-Keynesian approach. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention (EJEEP), 10(2), 243–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2015). Co-ordination of fiscal with monetary and financial stability policies can better cure unemployment. Review of Keynesian Economics, 3(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P. (2016). Main and contributory causes of the recent financial crisis and economic policy implications. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.), Emerging economies during and after the Great Recession. International papers in political economy (Annual ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., & González-Martinez, A. R. (2016). Income inequality: Implications and relevant economic policies. Panoeconomicus, 63(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., & Karakitsos, E. (2011). An analysis of the causes of the ‘Great Recession’ and some policy implications. In T. Niechoj, Ö. Onaran, E. Stockhammer, A. Truger, & T. van Treeck (Eds.), Stabilising an unequal economy? Public debt, financial regulation, and income distribution. Marburg: Metropolis-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., & Karakitsos, E. (2013). Financial stability in the aftermath of the ‘Great Recession’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2010). 21st century Keynesian economic policies. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.), 21st century Keynesian economics, international papers in political economy (Annual ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arestis, P., & Sawyer, M. (2011). Economic theory and policies: New directions after neoliberalism. In P. Arestis & M. Sawyer (Eds.), New economics as mainstream economics, International papers in political economy (Annual ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., Piketty, T., & Saez, E. (2011). Top incomes in the long run of history. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(1), 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2009, November 19). The role of macroprudential policy (Bank of England discussion paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2012, July 12). The distributional effects of asset purchases. Bank of England Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bank of England. (2016, July). Financial stability report: Executive summary. Available at: http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/fsr/2016/fsrjul16sum.pdf

  • Berg, A. G., & Ostry, J. D. (2011). Inequality and unsustainable growth: Two sides of the same coin? (IMF Staff discussion note 11/08). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A., & Zandi, M. (2010). How the Great Recession was brought to an end. Available at: https://www.economy.com/mark-zandi/documents/End-of-Great-Recession.pdf

  • Cynamon, B. J., & Fazzari, S. M. (2014). Inequality, the great recession and slow recovery. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2205524

  • Eggertsson, G. B. (2006). Fiscal multipliers and policy co-ordination (Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, No. 241). New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggertsson, G. B. (2011). What fiscal policy is effective at zero interest rates? NBER Macroeconomics Annual 2010, 25, 59–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. K. (2012). Inequality and instability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2016, October). World economic outlook.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. (2016). The end of alchemy: Money, banking and the future of the global economy. London: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korinek, A., & Kreamer, J. (2013). The redistributive effects of financial deregulation (NBER working paper 19572). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumhof, M., & Rencière, R. (2010a). Inequality, leverage and crises (IMF working paper 10/268). Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumhof, M., & Rencière, R. (2010b). Leveraging inequality. Finance and Development, 47(4), 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumhof, M., & Rencière, R. (2011). Unequal = indebted. Finance and Development, 48(3), 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde, C. (2014, May 27). Economic inclusion and financial integrity. Speech given at the conference on Inclusive Capitalism, London. Available at: http://www.inc-cap.com/IC_ESSAY_Book_Introduction_Keynotes.pdf

  • Lavoie, M., & Stockhammer, E. (Eds.). (2013). Wage-led growth: An equitable strategy for economic recovery. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan/International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muinelo-Gallo, L., & Roca-Sagalés, O. (2011). Economic growth and inequality: The role of fiscal policies. Australian Economic Papers, 50(2–3), 74–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. OECD: Paris. isbn:978-92-64-044180-0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onaran, O., & Galanis, G. (2013). Is aggregate demand wage-led or profit-led? A global model, Chapter 3 in Lavoie and Stockhammer (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippon, T. (2008, November). The evolution of of the U.S. financial industry from 1860 to 2007 (Working paper). New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saez, E. (2013, January 24). Income inequality: Evidence and policy. Lecture given for the ethics and wealth series. McCoy Family Center for Ethics in Society, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarin, N., & Summers, L. H. (2016, September 15–16). Have big banks gotten safer? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, BPEA Conference Draft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2013). The price of inequality: How Today’s divided society endangers our future. London: Allen Lane/Penguin Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. (2014, March 1). Social mobility: A memo to Obama, and inequality v growth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A. (2010, March 17). What do banks do? What should they do and what public policies are needed to ensure best results for the real economy? Speech given at the CASS Business School. Available at: http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pubs/speeches/at_17mar10.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix: Summary of Blocks

Appendix: Summary of Blocks

In what follows, the sign under the variables indicates the partial derivative of the dependent variable with respect to the relevant independent variable. In all equations in this contribution, lower case letters stand for the rate of change of the relevant variable; otherwise letters indicate the level of the relevant variable.

1.1 Block I: Aggregate Demand and Supply

$$ Y=C+I+G+\left(X-Q\right) $$
(6.1)

where Y is national income, C is consumption, I is investment, G is government expenditure, X is exports and Q is imports and thus (X − Q) is net exports (NE).

$$ C=C\left[\right( WE\left(1- t w\right),P\left(1- t\pi \right),R,\varDelta {\mathrm{BLP}}_{\mathrm{h}}\Big] $$
(6.2)

where W is wages, E total employment so WE is the wage bill, tw is the tax rate on wages, П is total profits, is the tax rate on profits, R is the rate of interest on loans to households and ΔBLPh is changes in bank lending to households.

$$ I=I\left(P/K,Y/\mathrm{Ya},R,\varDelta {\mathrm{BLP}}_{\mathrm{f}}\right) $$
(6.3)

where the symbols are as above with the exception of K, which is capital stock, ΔBLPf that stands for changes in bank lending to firms, and Ya, which is a measure of capacity output and corresponds to the ‘desired level’ of operation.

$$ \mathrm{Ya}=\mathrm{Ya}\left(\underset{+}{\mathrm{E}},\underset{+}{\mathrm{K}},\underset{+}{\mathrm{ST}}\right) $$
(6.4)

so that Ya would change over time in the same direction as changes in employment, capital stock and state of technology (ST).

There is a level of employment that corresponds to the capacity-output measure (Ea):

$$ \mathrm{Ea}=E\left(\underset{+}{Y/\mathrm{Ya}},\underset{+}{K},\underset{+}{ST}\right) $$
(6.5)

Ya is taken as a benchmark for firms’ investment decisions and employment.

Aggregate supply of output is:

$$ Ys= Ys\left(\underset{+}{E},\underset{+}{K},\underset{+}{ST}\right) $$
(6.6)

where the aggregate supply output (Ys) is determined by employment, capital stock and state of technology, with the symbols defined as above.

There is a level of employment that corresponds to output:

$$ E=E\left(\underset{+}{Y},\underset{\_}{K},\underset{\_}{ST}\right) $$
(6.7)

1.2 Block II: Distributional Aspects and the Inflationary Process

$$ \pi =\pi \left[\left(\underset{+}{P/ ULC}\right),\underset{+}{Y/ Ya},\underset{\_}{R},\underset{\_}{d{R}_f}\right] $$
(6.8)

where the variables , in addition to the ones defined as above, are: π is the profit rate, P is the level of prices, ULC is unit labour cost and dRf is the debt ratio of firms, defined as total debt to total assets of firms.

$$ \mathrm{ULC}=\frac{W}{PR} $$
(6.9)

where W is the level of wages, and PR is productivity.

$$ w=w\left\{\left[\underset{+}{{\left(W/P\right)}^d-\left(W/P\right)}\right],\left(\underset{+}{Y/ Ya}\right),\underset{+}{p},\underset{\_}{U},\underset{+}{\pi },\underset{+}{w^e}\right\} $$
(6.10)

where the variables are as above with the exception of the bargaining position of workers, which is defined as the difference between their desired real wage [(W/P)d] and the actual real wage (W/P); p, which is inflation, U is unemployment, where unemployment is taken as percent of the labour force and w e that stands for expectations of the wage rate.

$$ U=U\left[\left(\underset{\_}{Y/ Ya}\right),\underset{\_}{PR}\right] $$
(6.11)

where the variables are as defined above.

$$ p=p\left[\underset{+}{w},\left(\underset{+}{Y/ Ya}\right),\underset{\_}{q},\underset{\_}{er},\underset{+}{p_{\mathrm{rm}}},\underset{+}{p^{\mathrm{e}}}\right] $$
(6.12)

where the variables are as defined above, with the exception of q, which is the rate of change of productivity, er is the rate of change of the nominal exchange rate, p rm is the rate of change of the prices of raw materials and p e that stands for price expectations.

$$ {p}_{\mathrm{rm}}={p}_{\mathrm{rm}}\left(\underset{\_}{er},\underset{+}{WT}\right) $$
(6.13)

where the variables are as defined above with the exception of WT that stands for world trade.

1.3 Block III: Money and Credit

$$ \varDelta M=\varDelta \mathrm{BDGC}+\varDelta \mathrm{BDP} $$
(6.14)

where ΔM is changes in the money supply, namely, the sum of changes in bank deposits to the government including currency (ΔBDGC) and changes in bank deposits to the public (ΔBDP). In view of the small proportion of ΔBDGC of the total money supply, we treat it as the residual in the following identity:

$$ \varDelta \mathrm{BDGC}=\varDelta \mathrm{BLP}+\varDelta \mathrm{BLG}+\varDelta \mathrm{BLES}\hbox{--} \varDelta \mathrm{BDP} $$
(6.15)

Identity (Eq. 6.15) then defines ΔBDGC as the sum of changes in bank lending to the public (ΔBLP) and to the government (ΔBLG) as well as of changes in bank lending to the external sector including other non-bank lending (ΔBLES), minus ΔBDP. ΔBLES is treated as an exogenous variable and with ΔBLG endogenised in Block IV (see Eq. 6.19), the remaining variables in Eq. (6.15) are endogenised as follows:

$$ \varDelta \mathrm{BLP}=\varDelta \mathrm{BLP}\left(\underset{+}{\varDelta Y},\underset{\_}{\varDelta R},\underset{\_}{MP1}\right) $$
(6.16)

where the variables are as defined above, with the exception for the variable MP1, which stands for monetary policy variables such as credit-rationing by the authorities; this is of course in addition to changes in the rate of interest, which as Eq. (6.18) below shows, it is influenced by changes in the bank rate.

$$ \varDelta \mathrm{BDP}=\varDelta \mathrm{BDP}\left(\underset{+}{\varDelta Y},\underset{\_}{\varDelta R},\underset{\_}{MP2}\right) $$
(6.17)

with the variables as defined above, with the exception of MP2 that stands for monetary policy variables.

Both MP1 (Eq. 6.16) and MP2 (Eq. 6.17) can be thought of as financial-stability policy variables as discussed in Sect. 3.3.

$$ \varDelta R=\varDelta R\left(\underset{+}{\varDelta BR},\underset{+}{\varDelta EF},\underset{+}{\varDelta PDC}\right) $$
(6.18)

where in addition to the variables as defined above, ΔBR stands for changes in the bank rate, ΔEF stands for changes in external financing and ΔPDC that stands for sales of public debt to the non-bank public.

1.4 Block IV: Government Sector

$$ \varDelta \mathrm{BLG}=\mathrm{PSBR}+\varDelta EF\hbox{--} \varDelta \mathrm{PDC} $$
(6.19)

where the variables are defined as above with the exception of PSBR that stands for the public sector borrowing requirement.

PSBR, as portrayed in Eq. (6.20), is simply defined as the difference between government expenditure (G) and tax revenues (T) along with other government revenues (OGR).

$$ \mathrm{PSBR}=G\hbox{--} T\hbox{--} \mathrm{OGR} $$
(6.20)

We treat OGR as exogenous and hypothesise G and T to be determined as shown in Eqs. (6.21) and (6.23), respectively.

$$ G={P}_{\mathrm{G}}{Q}_{\mathrm{Q}}+W{E}_{\mathrm{G}}+U{U}_{\mathrm{B}}+ ID $$
(6.21)

where the symbols are defined as follows, with the exception of G, W and U that are defined as above: Q Q denotes the amount of goods and services bought by the government, with P G being their prices, E G stands for the number of employees in the government sector, U B is unemployment benefits and ID stands for interest payments on government debt. E G is defined as in Eq. (6.22):

$$ {E}_{\mathrm{G}}=E\hbox{--} {E}_{\mathrm{P}}\hbox{--} U $$
(6.22)

where E is total working population, as defined above for the purposes of Eq. (6.2), and E P is employment in the private sector. Clearly E G + E P = E that is total employment.

$$ T=T\left(\underset{+}{Y}\right) $$
(6.23)

1.5 Block V: Open Economy Aspects

$$ \varDelta EF=\mathrm{CB}+\varDelta KM\hbox{--} \mathrm{OEF} $$
(6.24)

where ΔEF is equal to the current balance of international payments (CB) plus changes in capital movements (ΔKM) minus other external financing (OEF); the latter variable includes external lending to the public sector plus domestic bank lending to the public sector in foreign currencies. We treat OEF as exogenous and endogenise CB and ΔKM.

$$ \mathrm{CB}= NE+ OCB=X\left(\underset{+}{WT},\underset{\_}{RER}\right)-Q\Big[\left( WE\left(\underset{+}{1- t w}\right),,\Pi \left(\underset{+}{1- t\pi}\right),,\underset{+}{RER}\right)+ OCB $$
(6.25)

where CB and NE are as above, OCB stands for other earnings on foreign investments minus payments made to foreign investors and cash transfers, WT is world trade, RER is the real exchange rate (where the exchange rate is defined as foreign to domestic currency), with WE(1 − tw) and П(1 − ) being the income distribution terms as they influence imports; all these variables are in real terms.

Finally, Eqs. (6.26) and (6.27) define ΔKM and RER:

$$ \varDelta KM=\varDelta KM\left[\left(\underset{+}{R/{R}_{\mathrm{W}}}\right),\underset{\_}{(er)^{\mathrm{e}}}\right] $$
(6.26)

where the variable, ratio of domestic interest rates (R) to world interest rates (R W), is included, along with the expected rate of change of the nominal exchange rate variable, (er)e.

$$ \mathrm{RER}=\mathrm{RER}\left[\left(\underset{+}{R/{R}_{\mathrm{W}}}\right),,,\underset{\_}{Y},,,\underset{+}{WT},,,\underset{+}{(er)^{\mathrm{e}}}\right] $$
(6.27)

where the variables are as defined above.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Arestis, P. (2018). A Coherent Approach to Macroeconomic Theory and Economic Policies. In: Arestis, P. (eds) Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69676-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69676-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69675-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69676-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics