Skip to main content

Sophistication, Productivity and Trade: A Sectoral Investigation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics

Abstract

João P. Romero and Gustavo Britto in this chapter, titled ‘Sophistication, Productivity and Trade: A Sectoral Investigation’, argue that in balance-of-payments-constrained growth models, income elasticities of exports and imports are the crucial parameters determining the long-term growth rate. Consequently, it is critical to understand what determines the level of these elasticities. The chapter investigates whether measures of productive sophistication developed by Hausmann et al. (J Econ Growth 12(1): 1–25, 2007) and Hidalgo and Hausmann (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(26): 10570–10575, 2009) can explain not only productivity growth but also the size of income elasticities of trade in different technological sectors. It does so by testing the impact of initial industry sophistication on subsequent productivity growth for low- and high-tech industries as well as by assessing if changes in industry sophistication are associated with higher exports and imports in these sectors. The empirical investigation uses product-level trade data from UN Comtrade, combined with price data from Feenstra and Romalis (Q J Econ 129(2): 477–527, 2014) and with productivity data from EU KLEMS for 13 industries from seven countries, over the period 1984–2007.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The original model was also extended to account for capital flows. See Thirlwall and Hussain (1982), Barbosa-Filho (2001), Moreno-Brid (2003).

  2. 2.

    See Romero and Britto (2017) for more detailed discussion on the data treatment.

  3. 3.

    Capacity constraints are not considered in this chapter’s tests.

References

  • Ang, J. B., Madsen, J. B., & Robertson, P. E. (2015). Export performance of the Asian miracle economies: The role of innovation and product variety. Canadian Journal of Economics, 48(1), 273–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Araujo, R. A., & Lima, G. T. (2007). A structural economic dynamics approach to balance-of-payments-constrained growth. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(5), 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D., & Coco, A. (2005). Measuring technological capabilities at the country level: A survey and a menu of choice. Research Policy, 34, 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahar, D., Hausmann, R., & Hidalgo, C. (2014). Neighbors and the evolution of the comparative advantage of nations: Evidence of international knowledge diffusion? Journal of International Economics, 92, 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and revealed comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33, 99–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. (1977). International trade and economic growth: an alternative to the neoclassical approach. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: An application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19(3), 321–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2013). Relatedness and technological change in cities: The rise and fall of technological knowledge in U.S. metropolitan areas from 1981 to 2010. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography, 13(16). Utrecht University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. (1976). On the relation between product differentiation and international trade flows. Discussion paper. University of Bath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J. (1988). International competitiveness. Economic Journal, 98(391), 355–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R., & Romalis, C. (2014). International prices and endogenous quality. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), 477–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., McCombie, J. S. L., & Naqvi, K. (2010). Is Pakistan’s growth rate balance-of-payments constrained? Policies and implications for development and growth. Oxford Development Studies, 38(4), 477–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Abdon, A., & Bacate, M. (2012). Product complexity and economic development. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, 36–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., Kumar, U., Usui, N., & Abdon, A. M. (2013). Why has China succeeded? And why it will continue to do so. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37, 791–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1979). Technological innovation and British trade performance. In F. Blackaby (Ed.), De-industrialization, national institute of economic and social research, Economic policy papers 2. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furtado, C. (1964). Development and underdevelopment. Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouvêa, R. R., & Lima, G. T. (2010). Structural change, balance-of-payments constraint and economic growth: Evidence from the multi-sectoral Thirlwall’s law. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 33, 171–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. (1988). Innovation and the structure of UK trade 1951–81: An exploration (Applied economics discussion paper, n. 63). Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, C. (1990). Innovation and trade performances in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 100(400), 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What you export matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., Hidalgo, C. A., Bustos, S., Coscia, M., Chung, S., Jimenez, J., Simões, A., & Yildirim, M. A. (2011). The atlas of economics complexity – Mapping paths to prosperity. Hollis: Puritan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C., & Hausmann, R. (2009). The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(26), 10570–10575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hidalgo, C., Klinger, B., Barabasi, A. L., & Hausmann, R. (2007). The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 317, 482–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C. (1970). The impact of national characteristics & technology on the commodity composition of trade in manufactured goods. In R. Vernon (Ed.), The technology factor in international trade, NBER Books. NBER: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1966). Causes of the slow rate of economic growth of the United Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kravis, I. B., & Lipsey, R. E. (1971). Price competitiveness in world trade. New York: National Bureau of Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. (1984). Sources of international comparative advantage: Theory and evidence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, A. (1955). The theory of economic growth. Homewood: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linder, S. B. (1961). An essay on trade and transformation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, D., Buxton, T., & Murfin, A. (1988). R&D innovation and trade performance. Unpublished. NEDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombie, J. S. L., & Thirlwall, A. P. (1994). Economic growth and the balance-of-payments constraint. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muendler, M. A. (2009). Converter from SITC to ISIC. Unpublished mimeo. University of California-San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2003). OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K., & Soete, L. (1980). Technical innovation and British economic performance. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. V. (1961). International trade and technical change. Oxford Economic Papers, 13(3), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. (1962). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Economic Bulletin for Latin America, 7, 1–22. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reis, J. G., & Farole, T. (2012). Trade competitiveness diagnostic toolkit. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. P., & Britto, G. (2017). Increasing returns to scale, technological catch-up and research intensity: An industry-level investigation combining EU KLEMS productivity data with patent data. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41, 391–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. P., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2016). Differences in increasing returns between technological sectors. Journal of Economic Studies, 43, 863–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero, J. P., & McCombie, J. S. L. (2017). Thirlwall’s law and the specification of export and import demand functions. Metroeconomica, 00:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/meca.12185

  • Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schott, K., & Pick, K. (1984). The effects of price and non-price factors on U.K. export performance and import penetration (Discussion paper, 84-01). Department of Political Economy, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setterfield, M. (2011). The remarkable durability of Thirlwall’s law. PSL Quarterly Review, 64(259), 393–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thirlwall, A. P. (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of international growth rates differences. Banca Nazionale del Lavoro Quarterly Review, 128, 45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. T. (1969). Test of a product cycle model of international trade: U.S exports of consumer durables. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 83(1), 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. T. (1972). International trade: The product life cycle approach. In The product life cycle and international trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Romero, J.P., Britto, G. (2018). Sophistication, Productivity and Trade: A Sectoral Investigation. In: Arestis, P. (eds) Alternative Approaches in Macroeconomics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69676-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69676-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69675-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69676-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics