Abstract
Some researchers believe that not much has changed in terms of how students prefer to study, whilst others believe that tertiary institutions have to adapt to a new generation of students. The aim of this paper is to determine if the learning approaches of students are changing. This will be done by comparing the learning approaches of students in 2016, with that of students of 10 years ago (2006). Questionnaires were distributed electronically to students in 2006, and again in 2016. It appears that learning approaches of these students have not changed much. Computer anxiety has increased, as well as the number of students unsure of their own chances of success. There is a decrease in students preferring to solve problems themselves rather than using available solutions, and more students prefer to work under supervision. These results show that it is essential that teaching and learning are designed according to the needs of the specific group of students it is meant for, not a mythical ‘new generation’ student.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bullen, M., Morgan, T.: Digital learners not digital natives. La Cuestión Universitaria 7, 60–68 (2016)
Bullen, M., Morgan, T., Qayyum, A.: Digital learners in higher education: generation is not the issue. Can. J. Learn. Technol. / La Revue Canadienne de l’Apprentissage et de la Technologie 37(1), 1–24 (2011)
Elam, C., Stratton, T., Gibson, D.D.: Welcoming a new generation to college: the millennial students. J. Coll. Admission 195, 20–25 (2007)
Huang, R., Yang, J.: Digital learners and digital teachers: challenges, changes, and competencies. In: Spector, J.M., Ifenthaler, D., Sampson, D.G., Isaías, P. (eds.) Competencies in Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership in the Digital Age, pp. 47–56. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30295-9_4
Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., Healing, G.: Net generation or digital natives: is there a distinct new generation entering university? Comput. Educ. 54(3), 722–732 (2010)
Kolikant, Y.B.-D.: Digital natives, better learners? Students’ beliefs about how the internet influenced their ability to learn. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26(6), 1384–1391 (2010)
Lai, K., Hong, K.: Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: do generational differences exist? Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(4), 725–738 (2015)
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., Vojt, G.: Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Comput. Edu. 56(2), 429–440 (2011)
Morgan, H.: Maximizing student success with differentiated learning. Clearing House J. Educ. Strat. Issues Ideas 87(1), 34–38 (2014)
Oh, E., Reeves, T.C.: Generational differences and the integration of technology in learning, instruction, and performance. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 819–828. Springer, Newyork (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_66
Srinivasan, R.: Emerging shifts in learning paradigms – from millenials to the digital natives. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 11(5), 3616–3618 (2016)
Taylor, E.: n Model van die Faktore wat die Sukses van Onderrigleer van Tegnologie-gebaseerde Onderwerpe beïnvloed. Doctoral dissertation, North-West University, South Africa (2007)
Uygarer, R., Uzunboylu, H., Ozdamli, F.: A piece of qualitative study about digital natives. Anthropologist 24(2), 623–629 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Taylor, E., van Aswegen, K. (2017). Students’ Learning Approaches: Are They Changing?. In: Liebenberg, J., Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 730. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69669-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69670-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)