Skip to main content

Knowledge Management and the New Configurations of Health Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 832 Accesses

Abstract

Throughout this book, we make a strong case for complex society. Complex society is an entity which becomes conceivable by deploying the concepts and methods of complexity theory. In this chapter, we argue that both complex society and complexity theory affect how health policy is formulated and planned, as well as how knowledge management functions are implemented in the field of service ecosystems constituted by public, private and non-governmental healthcare organisations. Organisational knowledge management has attracted considerable attention in recent years in the fields of public policy, public management and health policy in particular. Nonetheless, there are few widely shared views according to which the term itself is defined, much less a consensus on how best to apply it in healthcare service delivery. In this chapter, the role of organisational knowledge is explored (by making a distinction, for instance, between the use and exchange value of information). This chapter discusses how to manage knowledge internally and externally in order to achieve organisational success in healthcare services. We propose that intelligent knowledge leadership has to address how health organisations and service systems overcome their fundamental knowledge problems, and these problems have to be approached from the service-user point of view. Until this problem—and the constitution of two-dimensional horizontal accountability addressing the collaboration of service providers and the value produced for the service users addressed in the upcoming chapters in this book—is explored and defined, organisations run the risk of addressing the symptoms rather than the causes. Since we live in an age of a complex society and complex public policies, uncertainty refers to a lack of information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Argyris C (2010) Organizational traps. Leadership, culture, organizational design. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Fernandez I, Sabherwal R (2001) Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective. J Manag Inf Syst 18(1):23–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braybrooke D, Lindblom CE (1963) A strategy of decision: policy evaluation as a social process. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne A, Wildavsky A (1984) Implementation as exploration. In: Pressman JL, Wildavsky A (eds) Implementation. University of California, Berkeley, pp 232–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron A, Bostock L, Lart R (2014) Service user and career’s perspectives of joint and integrated working between health and social care. J Integr Care 22(2):62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm Sci Q 17(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MD, March JG, Olsen JP (2012) A “garbage can model” at forty: a solution that still attracts problems. In: Lomi A, Harrison JR (eds) The garbage can model of organizational choice: looking forward at forty (Research in the sociology of organizations, vol 36). Emerald Group Publishing, London, pp 19–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH, Harris JG (2007) Competing on analytics. The new science of winning. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dror Y (1964) Muddling through: science or inertia? Public Adm Rev 24(3):153–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dror Y (1968) Public policy making re-examined. Chandler Publishing, Scranton

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewert B, Evers A (2012) Contested meanings and challenges for user organizations. In: Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Vershuere B (eds) New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge, London, pp 61–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher MP, Elnitsky C (2012) Health and social services integration: a review of concepts and models. Soc Work Public Health 27(5):441–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Givel M (2016) What the big deal?: complexity versus traditional US policy approaches. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham P (ed) (1996) Mary Parker Follett – prophet of management. A celebration of writings from the 1920s. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray B (2016) A case study of complexity and health policy: planning for a pandemic. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter D (2003) Public health policy. Polity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson L (2016) Complexity modelling and application to policy research. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 150–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-oja J, Virtanen P, Jalonen H, Stenvall J (2015) The effects of the internet of things and big data to organizations and their knowledge management practices. In: Luden L et al (eds) Knowledge management in organizations, vol 224. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 495–513

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaivo-oja J, Virtanen P, Stenvall J, Jalonen H, Wallin J (2016) Future prospects for knowledge management in the field of health. KMO 2016. In: Proceedings of the 11th international knowledge management in organizations, Article no. 40. https://doi.org/10.1145/2925995.2926006, ACM, New York. http://dl.acm.org/icps.cfm

  • Kernick D (2004) Complexity and healthcare organization: a view from the street. Radcliffe Medical Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Little A (2016) Complexity and real politics. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 32–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyngsø AM, Godtfredsen NS, Høst D, Frølich A (2014) Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review. Int J Integr Care 14(3):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. Bell J Econ 9(2):587–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1987) Ambiquity and accounting: the elusive link between information and decision making. Acc Organ Soc 12(2):153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March JG (1994) A primer on decision making. How decisions happen. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nohrstedt D (2016) Complexity theory and collaborative crisis governance in Sweden. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 332–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1991) The knowledge creating company. Harv Bus Rev 69:96–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Takeuchi H (1995) The knowledge-creating company. How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Kodama M, Hirose A, Kohlbacher F (2014) Dynamic fractal organizations for promoting knowledge-based transformation – a new paradigm for organizational theory. Eur Manag J 32(1):137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I, Hirose A, Takeda Y (2016) Meso-foundations of dynamic capabilities: team-level synthesis and distributed leadership as the source of dynamic creativity. Glob Strateg J 6(3):168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordgren L (2009) Value creation in health care services – developing service productivity: experiences from Sweden. Int J Public Sect Manag 22(2):114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paquet G (1999) Governance through social learning. University of Ottawa Press, Ottawa

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peck J, Theodore N (2015) Fast policy. Experimental statecraft at the thresholds of neocapitalism. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff V (2012) Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: some crucial conceptual issues. In: Pestoff V, Brandsen T, Vershuere B (eds) New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge, London, pp 13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2010) What is value in health care? N Engl J Med 2010(363):2477–2481. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1011024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson I (2006) “Complexity”, “practical rationality” and evidence-based policy making. Policy Polit 34(1):115–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson I (2009) Intelligent policy making for a complex world: pragmatism, evidence and learning. Polit Stud 57(4):699–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69(1):99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1972) Administrative behavior. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1978) Rationality as process and as product of thought. Am Econ Rev 68(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Staber U, Sydow B (2002) Organizational adaptive capacity: a structuration perspective. J Manag Inq 11(4):408–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stenvall J, Virtanen P (2015) Intelligent public organizations? Public Organ Rev, published on-line 2.12.2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0331-1

  • Tenbensel T (2016) Complexity and health policy. In: Geyer R, Cairney P (eds) Complexity and public policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 369–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2015) Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic. J Acad Mark Sci 44(1):5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen P, Vakkuri J (2015) Searching for organizational intelligence in the evolution of public sector performance management. NISPAcee J Public Adm Policy 8(2):89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen P, Laitinen I, Stenvall J (2016b) Street-level bureaucrats as strategy shapers in social and health service delivery: empirical evidence from six countries. Int Soc Work 16(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816660602

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen P, Stenvall J, Kinder T, Hatem O (2017a) Do accountabilities change when public organisations transform to service systems? Financ Account Manag (In press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Virtanen P, Smedberg J, Nykänen P, Stenvall J (2017b) Palvelu- ja asiakastietojärjestelmien integraation vaikutukset sosiaali- ja terveyspalveluissa [Effects of service and customer information systems integration in social welfare and healthcare]. Valtioneuvoston tutkimus- ja selvitystoiminnan julkaisusarja 2/2017, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin J, Virtanen P, Kaivo-oja J, Jalonen H, Stenvall J (2017) Future prospects for knowledge management in the digitalized health. Unpublished article manuscript

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildavsky A (1979) Speaking truth to the power. The art and craft of policy analysis. Transaction, New Brunswick

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh YJ, Lai SQ, Ho CT (2006) Knowledge management enablers. Ind Manag Data Syst 106(6):793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Virtanen, P., Stenvall, J. (2018). Knowledge Management and the New Configurations of Health Markets. In: Intelligent Health Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69596-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69596-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69595-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69596-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics