Testing PMSC Norms
This chapter draws a comparative analysis of progress on policy reform after five years from the signature of Montreux. Regime theory stresses how reaching an agreement is a stage in the negotiation, not the end of the process and the assessment suggests that PMSC norms are still in the first stage of emergence—and not at the level of the norm cascade. The lack of regularized dialogue among signatories led to the establishment of the Montreux Document Forum.
- Avant, D. (2014). Online Commentary. Retrieved September 2014, from http://iissonline.net/interview-with-prof-deborah-avant-carried-out-in-denver-on-january-24-2014/
- Buckland, B. S., & Burdzy, A. M. (2013). Progress and Opportunities: Five Years On. DCAF Report, Geneva Center for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF).Google Scholar
- DeWinter-Schmitt, R. (Ed.). (2013). Montreux Five Years On: An analysis of State Efforts to Implement Montreux Document Legal Obligations and Good Practices. Barcelona: Adjuntament de Barcelona. Retrieved from http://ihrib.org/wpcontent/uploads/2013/12/MontreuxFv3.pdf
- Krasner, S. D. (Ed.). (1983). International Regimes. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Ralby, I. (2016). The Montreaux Document: The Legal Significance of a Non-legal Instrument. In G. Schaub Jr. & R. Kelty (Eds.), Private Military and Security Contractors: Controlling the Corporate Warrior (pp. 235–264). Lanham, MD: Rownan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
- Spector, B. I., & Zartman, I. W. (2003). Getting It Done: Post Agreement Negotiation and International Regimes. US Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar