Skip to main content

The Challenges of E-Governance in Public Administration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalization and the Challenges of Public Administration

Abstract

In an age characterized by increasing use of the Internet and communication technology, public administrators are facing the challenge of how to make public services accessible electronically. People live in a highly interconnected world in which information can be transmitted within seconds from one end of the world to the other. Previous decades have witnessed the proliferation in the use of technology, which also brought about serious challenges for public administrators. Friedman, in his The World is Flat, argues that technology has made the world smaller and flatter by eliminating the political, geographic boundaries as a result of information flow, trade, and collaboration across nations. The proliferation of social media, for example, the Internet, cellular phones, text messages, Facebook and Twitter, has changed the relations between the government and the public. Khan analyzes the benefits and the challenges of e-governance. The chapter analyzes the challenges of privacy, security, and the maintenance of the human element. Finally, the chapter makes a statistical analysis on the linkage between e-governance and globalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, A. B., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-Governance and Government Online in Canada: Partnerships, People and Prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammons, D. N. (2008). Leading Performance Management in Local Government. Washington, DC: ICMA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. (1999). On Organizational Learning (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1996). Organizational Learning II. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2012). Defining E-Governance. e-Service Journal, 8(2), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, V. (2003). E-Government and the Emergence of Virtual Organizations in the Public Sector. Information Polity, 8(3/4), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to Create a Culture of Transparency? E-Government and Social Media as Openness and Anti-corruption Tools for Societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calista, D., & Melitski, J. (2007). E-Government and E-Governance: Converging Constructs of Public Sector Information and Communications Technologies. Public Administration Quarterly, 31(1), 87–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Candler, G., & Dumont, G. (2010). The Price of Citizenship: Civic Responsibility as the Missing Dimension of Public Administration Theory. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(2), 169–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1996). Business & Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management (3rd ed.). Cincinnati: South-Western College Pub./Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charag, O., & Mufeed, A. (2013). Electronic Governance: Expansion of Service Delivery Magnitude and Lessening Role of Human Resource in Delivery of Public Services. International Journal of Retailing and Rural Business Perspectives, 2(2), 445–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J. T., & Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, E-Commerce and E-Research: Examining the Electronic Ties Between Citizens and Government. Administration and Society, 37(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, M., Schwester, R., Carrizales, T., & Melitski, J. (2011). A Study of E-Goverment and E-Governance: An Examination of Municipal Websites. Public Administration Quarterly, 35(1), 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadashzadeh, M. (2010). Social Media in Government: From E-Government to E-Governance. Journal of Business and Economics Research, 8(11), 81–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, S. (2009, December). The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E-Governance. Public Administration Review (Special Issue), S86–S101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2007). The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. Armonck: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emersen, R., & Harvey, C. (1996). Visions of Excellence in Australian and Canadian Human Services Organizations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(5/6), 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga, E. (2002). Trends in E-Government: How to Plan, Design, and Measure E-Government. Paper Presented at the Government Management Information Sciences (GMIS) Conference, Santa Fe, NM, June 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. London: Pitman Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L. (2006). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskins, L. E. (2013). The Effect of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) Diffusion on Corruption and Transparency (A Global Study). PhD dissertation, Texas A&M International University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiselhart, K. (2004). Digital Government and Citizen Participation Internationally. In A. Pavlichev & G. D. Garson (Eds.), Digital Government: Principles and Best Practises. Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund, Ã…. (2001). Democracy in an IT-Framed Society. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 23–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, S., & Pathrannarakul, P. (2013). E-Governance Towards Good Governance: A Global Appraisal. Journal of E-Governance, 36(1), 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2001). Understanding E-Governance for Development (i-Government Working Paper Series, Paper No. 11). Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, G., Pan, W., Lu, M., & Wang, J. (2009). The Widely Shared Definition of E-Government: An Exploratory Study. The Electronic Library, 27(6), 968–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, L. (2013). The Impact that E-Government Can Have on Reducing Corruption on Reducing Corruption and Enhancing Transparency. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 8(2), 210–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ionescu, L. (2016). Government and Social Media as Effective Tools in Controlling Corruption in Public Administration. Economics, Management and Financial Markets, 11(1), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The Endless Wire: E-Government as a Global Phenomenon. Global Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (2014). Networks, Network Governance, Networked Networks. International Review of Public Administration, 11(1), 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, E. H. (2008). Governance and Governance Networks in Europe. Public Management Review, 10(4), 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KOF. (2016). Retrieved February 16, 2017, from http://globalization.kof.ethz.ch/.

  • Korac-Kakabadse, N., Kouzmin, A., & Kakabadse, A. (2002). Revisiting Crises from a Resource Distribution Perspective: Learning for Local Government. Local Governance, 28(1), 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouzmin, A., Loffler, E., Klages, H., & Korac-Kakabadse, N. (1999). Benchmarking and Performance Measurement in Public Sectors: Towards Learning for Agency Effectiveness. The International Journal of Public Sector Management Learning, 12(1), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Panchanatham, N. (2014). Strategies for Effective E-Governance Management. International Journal of Global Business Management and Research, 3(1), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar Suri, P. (2014). Flexibility of Processes and E-Governance Performance. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8(2), 230–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazaroiu, G. (2014). The Social Construction of Participatory Media Technologies. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 6(1), 104–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikums, T. (2012). A Study of Electronic Document Management System Integration Needs in the Public Sector. International Journal of Advances of Engineering and Technology, 5(1), 194–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, C. (2003). E-Government in Europe: The State of Affairs, European Institute of Public Administration. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, M. T. (2004). Good Governance and Government Reinvention: A Normative Framework for E-Governance. International Symposium of Digital Divide and Digital Opportunity, Taipei, Taiwan

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljungholm, P. (2015). E-Governance and Public Sector Reform. Geopolitics, History and International Relations, 7(2), 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magro, M. (2012). A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government. Administrative Sciences, 2(2), 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, M. L., & Murphy, S. A. (2012). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies on Moral Agents and Governance in Society. CorporateGovernance, 12(5), 616–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melitski, J., & Calista, D. (2016). E-Government and E-Governance Best Practices in Cities and Countries Compared Between 2003 and 2012: Fad or Diffused Innovation. Public Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 913–948.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, P. A., Kumar, M., Mohania, M. K., & Nair, M. (2004). A Framework for E-Governance Solutions. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 48(5–6), 717–733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Retrieved March 14, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/recommendation-on-digital- government-strategies.htm.

  • Okot-Uma, R. W. (2001). Electronic Governance: (Leading to Good Government), Electronic Governance and Electronic Democracy: Living and Working in the Connected World. Ottawa: The Commonwealth Centre for Electronic Governance. Retrieved August 7, 2016, from www.electronegov.net.

  • Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peristeras, V., Tsekos, T., & Tarabanis, K. (2002). E-Government or E-Governance: Building a Domain Model for the Governance System. Thessaloniki: United Nations Thessaloniki Centre, University of Macedonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. (2007). Democracy and the New Public Service. American Review of Public Administration, 37(3), 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, G. H. (2015a). The Dynamics of Social Innovation Networks. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 3(2), 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, G. H. (2015b). The Competitive Nature and Effectiveness of Online Retailing. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management, 3(1), 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, G. H. (2015c). Sustainable Development and the Implementation of Citizen-Oriented Services. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 3(4), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding Governance. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, T. B. (2003). E-Government vs. E-Governance: Examining the Difference in a Changing Public Sector Climate. Ottawa: The Commonwealth Secretariat and Government Telecommunications and Information Services, Public Works and Government Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2005a). Introduction: The Internet and Governance in a Global Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2005b). A Global Diffusion Model of E-Governance. Journal of International Public Policy, 25(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, J. (2005). Governance and International Relations: A Consideration of Newly Emerging Capacities in a Multi-Level World. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 6(1), 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxena, K. B. C. (2005). Towards Excellence in E-Governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(6–7), 498–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, H. J. (2013). Electronic Government Research: Topical Directions and Preferences. In M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Eds.), Electronic Government, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8074 (pp. 1–13). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, D. C., & Eom, T. H. (2008). Government and Anti-corruption: Empirical Analysis of International Data. International Journal of Public Administration, 31(3), 298–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streib, G. D., & Willoughby, K. G. (2005). Local Governments: Meeting the Implementation Challenge. Public Administration Quarterly, 29(1–2), 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symonds, M. (2000). Government & the Internet: No Gain Without Pain. The Economist, 355, 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teicher, J., Hughes, O., & Dow, N. (2002). E-Government: A New Route to Public Sector Quality. Managing Service Quality, 12(6), 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN. (2002). Benchmarking E-Government: A Global Perspective. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/ groups/public/ documents/ UN/UNPAN021547.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2016.

  • UN-E Government Knowledge DataBase. (2016). Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, L. M. (2002). A Survey of the Literature on the Internet and Democracy. Paper Presented at the Prospects for Electronic Democracy Conference, Carnegie Mellon University, September 20–22, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E. W. (2005). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, J. M. (2003). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory: J-PART, 15(3), 371–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J. F. (1986). Participatory Democracy: Populism Revived. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Khan, H.A. (2018). The Challenges of E-Governance in Public Administration. In: Globalization and the Challenges of Public Administration. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69587-7_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics