Advertisement

Governance, Public Administration, and the Challenges of Globalization

  • Haroon A. Khan
Chapter

Abstract

The chapter explains globalization and the implications from the point of public administration. The term globalization refers to the revolutionary changes in the Internet and communication technology that has transformed politics and economics of the world. There is a globalization of demands as a result of the internationalization of the media. Globalization has facilitated greater openness and transparency of the affairs of the government. The actions of the government are under scrutiny by the public because of the international media. The rise of the global society has brought about the revolutionary changes in the world. The civil society has been instrumental in bringing the issues of global concern to the forefront of the media coverage. Khan investigates the challenges of outsourcing, multinational companies, the exploitation of labor, terrorism, dependency, cultural imperialism, dominance of financial institutions, network management to understand the complexities faced by modern public administration.

References

  1. Allan, J. R. (1999). Public–Private Partnerships: A Review of the Literature and Practice (Public Policy Paper No. 4). Regina Saskatchewan Institute of Public Policy, University of Regina.Google Scholar
  2. Andres, A. R. (2011). Sustainable Development, State Sovereignty and International Justice. In W. Lafferty & O. Langhelle (Eds.), Sustainable Development on the Aims of Development and Conditions of Sustainability. Houndmills: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Belloubet-Frier, N., & Timsit, G. (1993). Administration Transfigured: A New Administrative Paradigm? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 59(4), 531–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman, E. M. (2006). Dealing with Cynical Citizens. Public Administration Review, 57(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2000). Can Non-state Global Governance Be Legitimate? An Analytical Framework. Regulation and Governance, 1(1), 347–371.Google Scholar
  6. Bovaird, T. (2004). Public-Private Contested Concepts to Prevalent Practice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 70(2), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bovaird, T., & Löffler, E. (2002). Understanding Public Management and Governance. In T. Bovaird & E. Löffler (Eds.), Public Management and Governance (pp. 3–14). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Buntz, С. G. (1981). Problems and Service Productivity Improvement. Public Productivity Review, 5(4), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience. Social Studies of Science, 32(2), 235–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, T. L. (1998). Responsible Administrator: An Approach to Ethics for the Administrative Role. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Denhardt, R. B. (2004). Trust as Capacity: The Role of Integrity and Responsiveness. In A. I. Farazmand (Ed.), Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations (pp. 99–111). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  12. Farazmand, A. (2004). Sound Governance: Policy and Administrative Innovations. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  13. Forrer, J., Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., & Boyer, E. (2010). Public–Private Partnerships and the Public Accountability Question. Public Administration Review, 70(3), 475–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederickson, H. G. (2002). Confucius and the Moral Basis of Bureaucracy. Administration and Society, 33(4), 610–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Friedrich, C. J. (1940). Public Policy and the Nature of Administrative Responsibility. In C. J. Friedrich & E. S. Mason (Eds.), Public Policy: A Yearbook of the Graduate School of Public Administration (pp. 3–24). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Ganguli, P. (2007). Advantagesglobalization. Retrieved September 4, 2014, from https://www.jwu.edu/AdvantagesandDisadvantagesofGlobalization.doc
  17. Ghere, R. K. (2001). Probing the Strategic Intricacies of Public–Private Partnership: The Patent as a Comparative Reference. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 441–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gordon, G. J. (1986). Public Administration in America. New York: St. Marion’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. Halachmi, A. (2002). Performance Measurement, Accountability, and Improved Performance. Public Performance & Management Review, 25(4), 370–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halachmi, A. (2003). The Principal-Agent Perspective. In J. Rabin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy (Vol. 2). New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  21. Halachmi, A. (2005). Governance and Risk Management: Challenges and Public Productivity. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18(4), 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halachmi, A. (2010). Public-Private a Reality Check and the Limits Theory. Paper Presented at the Conference on Public Management Century: Opportunities and China.Google Scholar
  23. Halachmi, A., & Bouckaert, G. (1995). Re-engineering in the Public Sector. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 61(3), 323–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handy, C. (1998). Beyond Certainty: The Changing Worlds of Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hanf, K., & Scharf, F. W. (1978). Inter-Organizational Policy Making: Limits to Coordination and Central Control. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  26. Holzer, M., & Lee, K. (1993). Public Productivity Handbook. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Hood, C. (1995). The “New Public Management” in the 1980s: Variations on a Theme. Accounting Organizations and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnston, J., & Gudergan, S. P. (2007). Public-Private Partnerships: Lessons Australian Case? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(4), 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jreisat, J. (2005). Comparative Public Administration Is Back in Prudently. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karamagioli, E., Staiou, E.-R., & Gouscos, D. (2014). Can Open-Government Models Contribute to More Collaborative Ways of Governance? An Assessment of the Greek OpenGov Initiative. Public Administration and Information Technology, 4(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
  31. Kee, J. E., Newcomer, K. E., Trent, D. L., Oster, V., & Rosen, S. (2007). Keeping the Public Interest in Public-Private Partnerships (Working Paper No. 5). Center for Innovation in Public Service, George Washington University.Google Scholar
  32. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2000). Introduction. In J. S. Nye & J. D. Donahue (Eds.), Governance in a Globalization World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kettl, D. F. (2002). Managing Indirect Government. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance (pp. 490–510). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kettl, D. F. (2003). The Global Public Management Revolution: A Report on Transformation of Governance. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.Google Scholar
  35. Khan, A. (2007). Introduction: Reinventing Public Enterprises. In UN, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Ed.), Public Enterprises: Unresolved Challenges and New Opportunities. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  36. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Kinnock, N. (1998). Using Public-Private Parternships to Develop Transport Infrastructure. Retrieved July 10, 2011, from http://europa.eu.int/en/comm/dgQ7/speech/sp9837.htm
  38. Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2012). Governance Network Theory: Past, Present and Future. Policy and Politics, 40(4), 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as Governance. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Koppenjan, J. F. M., & Klijn, E. (2004). Managing Uncertainties in Networks. A Network Approach to Problem Solving and Decision-Making. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Kouzmin, A., & Dixon, J. (2006). Neoliberal Economics, Public Domains, and Organizations: Is There Any Organizational Design After “Privatization?”. In T. D. Lynch & P. L. Cruise (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Theory and Management: The Philosophical Approach (pp. 667–728). Boca Raton: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  42. Linder, S. H. (1999). Coming to Terms with the Public-Private Partnership: A Grammar of Multiple Meanings. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(1), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lyne, M. M., Nielson, D. L., & Tierney, M. J. (2006). Who Delegates? Alternative Models of Principals in Development Aid. In D. G. Hawkins, D. A. Lake, D. L. Nielson, & M. J. Tierney (Eds.), Delegation and Agency in International Organizations (pp. 39–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morgan, G. (2006). Images of Organization (Updated ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  46. O’Looney, J. (1992). Public-Private Partnerships in Economic Development: Negotiating the Trade-Off Between Flexibility and Accountability. Economic Development Review, 10(4), 14–31.Google Scholar
  47. OECD. (1997). In Search of Results: Performance Management Practices. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  48. Olsen, J. P. (2006). Maybe It Is Time to Rediscover Bureaucracy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ostrom, E. (1986). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. Public Choice, 48(1), 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Peters, B. G. (2009). The Politics of Bureaucracy (6th ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  52. Raadschelders, J. B. (1992). Definition of Smallness: A Comparative Study. In R. Baker (Ed.), Public Administration in Small and Island States (pp. 26–33). West Hart: Kumarian Press.Google Scholar
  53. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ritzer, G. (2010). Globalization: A Basic Text. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  55. Robinson, W. I. (2008). Latin America and Global Capitalism: A Critical Globalization Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
  56. Rondinelli, D. A. (2007). Can Public Enterprises Contribute to Development? A Critical Assessment and Alternatives for Management Improvement. In Public Enterprises: Unresolved Challenges and New Opportunities. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  57. Rosenau, P. V. (2000). Public-Private Policy Partnerships. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). In the Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Saul, J. R. (2005). The Collapse of Globalism and the Reinvention of the World. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  60. Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Seven Bridges Press.Google Scholar
  61. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Towards a Political Conception of Corporate Responsibility—Business and Society Seen from a Habermasian Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global Rules and Private Actors: Toward a New Role of the Transnational Corporation in Global Governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  64. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Administration and Society, 29(2), 115–138.Google Scholar
  65. UN. (2007). Innovations in Governance, in the Middle East, North Africa, and Western Balkans. Department of Economic and Social Affairs.Google Scholar
  66. United Nations. (2005). United Nations Conference on Human Settlements.Google Scholar
  67. Verheijen, A. J. G. (2003). Public Administration in Post-communist States. In G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 489–499). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vogetlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. (2012). Responsible Leadership in Global Business: A New Approach to Leadership and Its Multi-Level Outcomes. Journal off Business Ethics, 105(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Webster, D. W., & Stanton, T. H. (2014). Improving Government Decision Making Through Enterprise Management. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  70. Wettenhall, R. (2003). The Rhetoric and Reality of Public-Private Partnerships. Public Organization Review, 3(1), 77–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Haroon A. Khan
    • 1
  1. 1.Henderson State UniversityArkadelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations