Skip to main content

Cervical Masses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 666 Accesses

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been widely included in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) protocols for gynaecological cancer evaluation. In the setting of cervical carcinoma, it has been mainly used for detection, staging and assessment of treatment response. Moreover, the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) quantification for predicting both response to neoadjuvant therapy and disease-free survival has been studied over the last years and appears to be a promising application. Imaging findings of rare cervical malignant tumours are similar to those of the typical squamous cell carcinoma, so histological differentiation is not possible regarding only MRI features. Besides emphasizing the role of DWI in regard to cervical malignancies, this chapter also aims to review how normal cervix and common cervical benign conditions behave on DWI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent diffusion coefficient

BEM:

Bi-exponential models

CRT:

Chemoradiotherapy

D :

Pure molecular diffusion (D)

D*:

Pseudo-diffusion coefficient

DCE:

Dynamic contrast enhanced

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

DWIBS:

Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression

f :

Perfusion fraction

FIGO:

International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics

LN:

Lymph nodes

MEM:

Mono-exponential model

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PMI:

Parametrial invasion

SEM:

Stretched exponential model

T1WI:

T1-weighted imaging

T2WI:

T2-weighted imaging

References

  1. Chen J, Zhang Y, Liang B, Yang Z. The utility of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2010;74(3):e101–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Well D, Yang H, Houseni M, Iruvuri S, Alzeair S, Sansovini M, et al. Age-related structural and metabolic changes in the pelvic reproductive end organs. Semin Nucl Med. 2007;37(3):173–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Messiou C, Morgan VA, De Silva SS, Ind TE, deSouza NM. Diffusion weighted imaging of the uterus: regional ADC variation with oral contraceptive usage and comparison with cervical cancer. Acta Radiol. 2009;50(6):696–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Okamoto Y, Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Itai Y. MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2003;23(2):425–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Deshmukh SP, Gonsalves CF, Guglielmo FF, Mitchell DG. Role of MR imaging of uterine leiomyomas before and after embolization. Radiographics. 2012;32(6):E251–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castagnola DE, Hoffman MK, Carlson J, Flynn C. Necrotizing cervical and uterine infection in the postpartum period caused by group A streptococcus. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(2 Pt 2):533–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou C-Y, Liang P-C, Chen C-A, Lee C-N. Cervical abscess with vaginal fistula after extraperitoneal cesarean section. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(12):1048–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heo SH, Shin SS, Kim JW, Lim HS, Seon HJ, Jung S-I, et al. Imaging of actinomycosis in various organs: a comprehensive review. Radiographics. 2014;34(1):19–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sala E, Rockall A, Rangarajan D, Kubik-Huch RA. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the female pelvis. Eur J Radiol [Internet]. 2014;76(3):367–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Manoharan D, Das CJ, Aggarwal A, Gupta AK. Diffusion weighted imaging in gynecological malignancies—present and future. World J Radiol. 2016;8(3):288–97.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. McVeigh PZ, Syed AM, Milosevic M, Fyles A, Haider MA. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2008;18(5):1058–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Punwani S. Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol. 2014;78(1):21–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(1):71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hou B, Xiang S-F, Yao G-D, Yang S-J, Wang Y-F, Zhang Y-X, et al. Diagnostic significance of diffusion-weighted MRI in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(12):11761–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoogendam JP, Klerkx WM, de Kort GAP, Bipat S, Zweemer RP, Sie-Go DMDS, et al. The influence of the b-value combination on apparent diffusion coefficient based differentiation between malignant and benign tissue in cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;32(2):376–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pecorelli S. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;105(2):103–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Freeman SJ, Aly AM, Kataoka MY, Addley HC, Reinhold C, Sala E. The revised FIGO staging system for uterine malignancies: implications for MR imaging. Radiographics. 2012;32:1805–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK, Kim B. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in predicting parametrial invasion in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(5):1081–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Park JJ, Kim CK, Park SY, Park BK. Parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: fused T2-weighted imaging and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging with background body signal suppression at 3T. Radiology. 2015;274(3):734–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rockall AG, Ghosh S, Alexander-Sefre F, Babar S, Younis MTS, Naz S, et al. Can MRI rule out bladder and rectal invasion in cervical cancer to help select patients for limited EUA? Gynecol Oncol. 2006;101(2):244–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu Y, Bai R, Sun H, Liu H, Wang D. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of uterine cervical cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33(6):858–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park SO, Kim JK, Kim KA, Park B-W, Kim N, Cho G, et al. Relative apparent diffusion coefficient: determination of reference site and validation of benefit for detecting metastatic lymph nodes in uterine cervical cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(2):383–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim JK, Kim KA, Park B-W, Kim N, Cho K-S. Feasibility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: early experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(3):714–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen G, Zhou H, Jia Z, Deng H. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of pelvic metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Radiol. 2015;88(1052):20150063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Schob S, Meyer HJ, Pazaitis N, Schramm D, Bremicker K, Exner M, et al. ADC histogram analysis of cervical cancer aids detecting lymphatic metastases-a preliminary study. Mol Imaging Biol. 2017;19(6):953–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kitajima K, Tanaka U, Ueno Y, Maeda T, Suenaga Y, Takahashi S, et al. Role of diffusion weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of intrapelvic recurrence of gynecological malignant tumor. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0117411.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lucas R, Lopes Dias J, Cunha TM. Added value of diffusion-weighted MRI in detection of cervical cancer recurrence: comparison with morphologic and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequences. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21(5):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Whittaker CS, Coady A, Culver L, Rustin G, Padwick M, Padhani AR. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of female pelvic tumors: a pictorial review. Radiographics. 2009;29(3):758–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harry VN, Semple SI, Gilbert FJ, Parkin DE. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the early detection of response to chemoradiation in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111(2):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schreuder SM, Lensing R, Stoker J, Bipat S. Monitoring treatment response in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer by additional diffusion-weighted imaging: a systematic review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(3):572–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rizzo S, Buscarino V, Origgi D, Summers P, Raimondi S, Lazzari R, et al. Evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and MR spectroscopy (MRS) as early response biomarkers in cervical cancer patients. Radiol Med. 2016;121(11):838–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meng J, Zhu L, Zhu L, Ge Y, He J, Zhou Z, et al. Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient for monitoring early response in patients with advanced cervical cancers undergoing concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(11):1400–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Erbay G, Onal C, Karadeli E, Guler OC, Arica S, Koc Z. Predicting tumor recurrence in patients with cervical carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: value of quantitative histogram analysis on diffusion-weighted MR images. Acta Radiol. 2017;58(4):481–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ho JC, Allen PK, Bhosale PR, Rauch GM, Fuller CD, Mohamed ASR, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a predictor of outcome in cervical cancer after chemoradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;97(3):546–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Onal C, Erbay G, Guler OC. Treatment response evaluation using the mean apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;44(4):1010–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y-T, Li Y-C, Yin L-L, Pu H. Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict survival in patients with cervical cancer? A meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85(12):2174–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bae JM, Kim CK, Park JJ, Park BK. Can diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging predict tumor recurrence of uterine cervical cancer after concurrent chemoradiotherapy? Abdom Radiol (New York). 2016;41(8):1604–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Jalaguier-Coudray A, Villard-Mahjoub R, Delouche A, Delarbre B, Lambaudie E, Houvenaeghel G, et al. Value of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the detection of pathologic complete response in cervical cancer after Neoadjuvant therapy: a retrospective observational study. Radiology. 2017;284(2):432–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lee EYP, Perucho JAU, Vardhanabhuti V, He J, Siu SWK, Ngu SF, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion MRI assessment of chemoradiation-induced pelvic bone marrow changes in cervical cancer and correlation with hematological toxicity. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(5):1491–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Li XS, Fang H, Song Y, Li D, Wang Y, Zhu H, et al. The stratification of severity of acute radiation proctopathy after radiotherapy for cervical carcinoma using diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2017;87:105–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lin G, Huang Y-T, Chao A, Lin Y-C, Yang L-Y, Wu R-C, et al. Endometrial cancer with cervical stromal invasion: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 3T. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):1867–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Lopes Dias J, Cunha TM, Gomes FV, Calle C, Felix A. Neuroendocrine tumours of the female genital tract: a case-based imaging review with pathological correlation. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(1):43–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee EYP, Hui ESK, Chan KKL, Tse KY, Kwong WK, Chang TY, et al. Relationship between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tissue perfusion of cervical cancers. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42(2):454–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lin M, Yu X, Chen Y, Ouyang H, Wu B, Zheng D, et al. Contribution of mono-exponential, bi-exponential and stretched exponential model-based diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the diagnosis and differentiation of uterine cervical carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(6):2400–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Winfield JM, Orton MR, Collins DJ, Ind TEJ, Attygalle A, Hazell S, et al. Separation of type and grade in cervical tumours using non-mono-exponential models of diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(2):627–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to João Lopes Dias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dias, J.L., Cunha, T.M. (2018). Cervical Masses. In: Akata, D., Papanikolaou, N. (eds) Diffusion Weighted Imaging of the Genitourinary System. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69575-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69575-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69574-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69575-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics