Abstract
The amount of risk transferred to the private operator must be enough to create the incentives that enhance the efficiency of delivery. But transferring risk has a cost in terms of increased finance costs. These affect the scale of the unitary charge, and hence only those risks that can be identified, managed and mitigated by the private operator should be allocated to them. Risk is also, in some jurisdictions, a crucial variable in terms of contract qualification and accounting treatment, and it must therefore be assessed objectively in both financial and economic appraisals. In this chapter, the key dimensions of risk assessment in these contexts are analysed in detail.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to Eurostat, the term PPPs “will be exclusively used to describe those long-term contracts in which government pays to a non-government partner all or a majority of the fees under a specific contractual arrangement, thus covering most of the total cost of the service provided (including the amortisation of the assets). In national accounts, this feature distinguishes PPPs from concessions. In a concession contract, government makes no regular payments to the partner, or such payments, if they exist, do not constitute a majority of fees received by the partner. In a PPP contract the final users do not pay directly (i.e. in a way proportional to the use of the asset and clearly identified only for this use), or only for a minor part (and generally for some specific uses of the asset), for the use of the assets for which a service will be provided”.
References
Boardman, A., & Hellowell, M. (2016). A Comparative Analysis and Evaluation of Specialist PPP Units’ Methodologies for Conducting Value for Money Appraisals. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 19(3), 191–206.
Carillo, P., Robinson, H., Foale, P., Anumba, C., & Bouchlaghem, D. (2008). Participation, Barriers, and Opportunities in PFI: The United Kingdom Experience. Journal of Management in Engineering, 24, 138–145.
Eurostat. (2016). Manual on Government Deficit and Debt. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Farquharson, E., de Mästle, C. T., & Yescombe, E. R. (2011). How to Engage with the Private Sector in Public-private Partnerships in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.
Hellowell, M., & Pollock, A. M. (2009). Non-profit Distribution: The Scottish Approach to Private Finance in Public Services. Social Policy and Society, 8(03), 405–418.
Hellowell, M., & Vecchi, V. (2012). An Evaluation of the Projected Returns to Investors on 10 PFI Projects Commissioned by the National Health Service. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 77–100.
Hellowell, M., & Vecchi, V. (2015). The Non-Incremental Road to Disaster? A Comparative Policy Analysis of Agency Problems in the Commissioning of Infrastructure Projects in the UK and Italy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 17, 519–532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13876988.2015.1016773.
Hellowell, M., Vecchi, V., & Caselli, S. (2015). Return of the State? An Appraisal of Policies to Enhance Access to Credit for Infrastructure-based PPPs. Public Money & Management, 35(1), 71–78.
Lonsdale, C. (2005). Risk Transfer and the UK Private Finance Initiative: A Theoretical Analysis. Policy and Politics, 33(2), 231–249.
National Audit Office. (2013). Review of the VFM Assessment Process for PFI.
Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. (2014). Annual Report.
Pollitt, M. (2005). Learning from UK Private Finance Initiative Experience. In G. A. Hodge & C. Greve (Eds.), The Challenge of Public-private Partnerships: Learning from International Experience (p. 207). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Pollock, A. M., Dunnigan, M. G., Gaffney, D., Price, D., & Shaoul, J. (1999). The Private Finance Initiative: Planning the “New” NHS: Downsizing for the 21st Century. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 319(7203), 179.
Shaoul, J., Stafford, A., & Stapleton, P. (2008). The Cost of Using Private Finance to Build, Finance and Operate Hospitals. Public Money & Management, 28(3), 101–108.
Siemiatycki, M., & Farooqi, N. (2012). Value for Money and Risk in Public–private Partnerships: Evaluating the Evidence. Journal of the American Planning Association, 78(3), 286–299.
Vecchi, V., Hellowell, M., & Gatti, S. (2013). Does the Private Sector Receive an Excessive Return from Investments in Health Care Infrastructure Projects? Evidence from the UK. Health Policy, 110(2), 243–270.
Vecchi, V., Hellowell, M., della Croce, R., & Gatti, S. (2017). Government Policies to Enhance Access to Credit for Infrastructure-based PPPs: An Approach to Classification and Appraisal. Public Money & Management, 37(2), 133–140.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vecchi, V. (2018). The Key Element of PPP: Risk. In: Vecchi, V., Hellowell, M. (eds) Public-Private Partnerships in Health. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69563-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69563-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69562-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69563-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)