Skip to main content

Theological Stocktaking with Pierre Boulez

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 234 Accesses

Part of the book series: Radical Theologies and Philosophies ((RADT))

Abstract

This chapter introduces postwar music from Pierre Boulez, a contemporary of Cage, who represents “modern” pathology antithetical to the order of God for many theological commentators. In the 1950s, his brief experimentation with a compositional technique known as total serialism (also explored by modern composers such as Milton Babbitt and Karlheinz Stockhausen) sought to control in new works every musical value, including rhythm, pitch, dynamics, and attack, with restrictive and formulaic pre-compositional decision-making. Recent discourse about music and theology characterizes Boulez’s method of extreme musical control as a negation of any sense of musical contingency and order provided by God. I retell a short biography of Boulez with emphasis upon his religious education and reevaluate his postwar total-serial works such as Structures Ia in order to suggest that his musical innovation emerges in the face of societal ruin and that his creativity is generative for theological analysis of music more broadly conceived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Begbie primarily develops his critical evaluation from an exchange of letters between Cage and Boulez spanning the years from 1949 to 1954.

  2. 2.

    Begbie 2000, pp. 186–88.

  3. 3.

    In Theology, Music and Time, though Begbie admits that the designation from Kris is “undoubtedly exaggerated” (192), “Control at the Price of Destruction” nevertheless serves as the subject heading to his introduction of Boulez in Resounding Truth (246).

  4. 4.

    Begbie 2007, pp. 246–47. Begbie includes a subheading above his discussion of Boulez in Resounding Truth that reads, “Control at the Price of Destruction.”In that section, he asks, “What was Nazism if not ‘control at the price of destruction,’ ‘order equivalent to disorder’?”

  5. 5.

    Catherine Pickstock, “Messian and Deleuze: The Musico-theological Critique of Modernism and Postmodernism,” Theory, Culture & Society December 25.7–8 (2005), 173–199.

  6. 6.

    Brown 2000, pg. 246.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 251.

  8. 8.

    Jameux 1991, pg. 5.

  9. 9.

    Wolff 2001, pg. 27. Wolff speculates that perhaps Bach was ill or needed to tend to family matters. John Eliot Gardiner suggests that bullying also may have factored into Bach’s truancies. See Gardiner 2013, pg. 168.

  10. 10.

    For more on the unintelligibility of musical life specific to France in the time of Boulez’s rise as a composer, see Barenboim 2008, pp. 177–80.

    For more on Augustine’s divinely metered and proportioned universe, see Taliaferro 1939, pp. 144–147.

  11. 11.

    Jameux 1991, pg. 17.

  12. 12.

    “Boulez, Pierre,” in The Oxford Dictionary of Music, 6th ed. Tim Rutherford-Johnson, Michael Kennedy, and Joyce Bourne Kennedy, eds. (Oxford, U.K.: Oxford UP, 2012). http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199578108.001.0001/acref-9780199578108-e-1247.

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    See Ibid. This quotation from Boulez originally comes from a speech at the Paris Opéra, December 10, 1978, on the occasion of Messiaen’s 17th birthday. See also Boulez, “The Power of Example,” Boulez and Nattiez, 1986, 1990, pp. 418–20.

  15. 15.

    For a more detailed explanation of Schoenberg’s views of harmony, see Schoenberg and Adams 1948.

  16. 16.

    Boulez et al. 1991, pp. 7–9.

  17. 17.

    Ivan Hewett, on M. “Bach—the Voice of God in Human Form,” The Daily Telegraph 27 (2005).

  18. 18.

    Alison Rose, “A Viennese Interpretation of Moses: Arnold Schoenberg’s Jewish Identity,” Judaism 39.3 (1990).

  19. 19.

    Anne C. Shreffler, “Mein Weg geht jetzt vorüber: The Vocal Origins of Webern’s Twelve-Tone Composition,” Journal of the American Musicological Society, 47.2 (1994): 320.

  20. 20.

    Ibid. From footnote 66 in Shreffler, “Was ich meine, wiirde Ihnen am besten meine Dichtung ‘Jakobsleiter’ (ein Oratorium) sagen: ich meine—wenn auch ohne alle organisatorischen Fesseln—die Religion. Mir war sie in diesen Jahren meine einzige Stiitze—es sei das hier zum erstenmal gesagt” (Arnold Schoenberg Lettern, 71 [Erwin Stein, ed., Arnold Schoenberg Briefe (Mainz: B. Schott’s S6hne, 1958), 70]). This letter evoked a cruelly anti-Semitic response from Kandinsky, which ended their friendship.

  21. 21.

    Griffiths 1978, pg. 21.

  22. 22.

    Ibid., 22–23.

  23. 23.

    Ibid., 23.

  24. 24.

    Ibid., 24.

  25. 25.

    Ibid., 26. Of Structures Ib Griffiths writes, “But, transfigured by the experience of compositional rigour, the turbulent variety of the earlier works now has the more abstract aspect of creative virtuosity.”

  26. 26.

    Peyser and Wuorinen 2008, pg. 136. Peyser helpfully notes , “Bach’s use of his own name in The Art of the Fugue provided the inspiration for this choice [from Boulez].”

  27. 27.

    Butler 1980, pg. 30.

  28. 28.

    Hill and Simeone 2007, pg. 24. Hill and Simeone 2005, pg. 156.

  29. 29.

    Begbie 2000, pp. 187–88.

  30. 30.

    Adorno 2006, pg. 102.

  31. 31.

    Boulez eventually admits, “Serialism is long dead.” For him, “It was killed by the same people who wrote it.”

    Michael Kimmelman, “Boulez’s Gentler Roar,” The New York Times January 6, 2010, 3. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/arts/music/10boulez.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1 [last accessed, July 7, 2017].

  32. 32.

    Bourdieu 1990, pp. 81–3.

  33. 33.

    The Bible, New Revised Standard Version.

  34. 34.

    Ibid., 155–60.

  35. 35.

    Of course, the Grammy is generally ambivalently valued in the world of classical music. Boulez himself never accepted the awards in person. Yet whether these or other decorations of prestige like his Léonie Sonning Music Prize (1985, first given to Stravinsky in 1959), Kyoto Lifetime Achievement Prize in Arts and Philosophy (2009), or Edison Award (2010) mark distinction, Boulez without a doubt consistently and indelibly shaped modern music.

    Incidentally, his total of 26 awards ranks third just after Quincy Jones (27) for the all-time number of Grammy Awards won. Boulez far exceeds more popular acts including U2 (22), Michael Jackson (13), and the Rolling Stones (2). Classical music conductor Georg Solti (1912–1927) currently leads with 31.

  36. 36.

    Jameux 1991, 126.

  37. 37.

    Henrich and Pacini 2003, pg. 80.

  38. 38.

    Butler 1980, 163; fn. 9.

  39. 39.

    Rings 2011.

  40. 40.

    Ibid., 5. Rings writes, “The models I develop here thus offer new ways of thinking about some very familiar aural experiences. The hope is that those aural experiences may be de-familiarized in the process, making us acutely alive to them again, and allowing us to sense tonal effects with renewed intensity, and in new ways. For surely one of the great values of music theory is its potential to refract, alter, and intensify musical experience, in ways both subtle and not-so-subtle, as new discursive concepts are brought to bear on the sonic stuff of music. Tonal music is no different from any other music in this regard: it admits of, and rewards, many modes of analytical engagement.”

  41. 41.

    Nattiez 2004, pg. 82.

  42. 42.

    Taylor 1987, pp. 168–69.

  43. 43.

    Smith 2007, pp. 255–56.

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W., and Robert Hullot-Kentor. 2006. Philosophy of New Music. Trans. Robert Hullot-Kentor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barenboim, Daniel. 2008. In Everything Is Connected: The Power of Music, ed. Elena Cheah. London: Weidenfeld/Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begbie, Jeremy. 2000. Theology, Music, and Time, Cambridge Studies in Christian Doctrine. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Resounding Truth: Christian Wisdom in the World of Music. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulez, Pierre, and Jean-Jacques Nattiez. 1986/1990. Orientations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulez, Pierre, Paule Thévenin, and Stephen Walsh. 1991. Stocktakings from an Apprenticeship. New York: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Frank Burch. 2000. Good Taste, Bad Taste, & Christian Taste: Aesthetics in Religious Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Christopher. 1980. After the Wake : An Essay on the Contemporary Avant-Garde. New York: Oxford University Press/Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, John Eliot. 2013. Bach: Music in the Castle of Heaven. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Paul. 1978. Boulez, Oxford Studies of Composers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, Dieter, and David S. Pacini. 2003. Between Kant and Hegel: Lectures on German Idealism. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, Ivan on M. 2005. Bach the Voice of God in Human Form. The Daily Telegraph 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Peter, and Nigel Simeone. 2005. Messiaen. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Olivier Messiaen: Oiseaux Exotiques. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameux, Dominique. 1991. Pierre Boulez. London: Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmelman, Michael. 2017. Boulez’s Gentle Roar. New York Times, January 6, 2010. Last accessed July 7, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/10/arts/music/10boulez.html?pagewanted=3&_r=1.

  • Nattiez, Jean-Jacques. 2004. The Battle of Chronos and Orpheus: Essays in Applied Musical Semiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyser, Joan, and Charles Wuorinen. 2008. To Boulez and Beyond. Rev. ed. Lanham: Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstock, Catherine. 2007. God and Meaning in Music: Messiaen, Deleuze, and the Musico-Theological Critique of Modernism and Postmodernism. Sacred Music 134 (4): 40–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rings, Steven. 2011. Tonality and Transformation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Alison. 1990. A Viennese Interpretation of Moses: Arnold Schoenberg’s Jewish Identity. Judaism 39 (3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford-Johnson, Tim, Michael Kennedy, and Joyce Bourne Kennedy eds. 2012. The Oxford Dictionary of Music, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199578108.001.0001/acref-9780199578108-e-1247. Last accessed July 24, 2017.

  • Schoenberg, Arnold, and Robert Dana Walden Adams. 1948. Theory of Harmony Harmonielehre. Philosophical Library: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shreffler, Anne C. 1994. Mein Weg geht jetzt vorüber: The Vocal Origins of Webern’s Twelve-Tone Composition. Journal of the American Musicological Society 47 (2): 320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Ted A. 2007. The New Measures: A Theological History of Democratic Practice. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taliaferro, Catesby. 1939. St. Augustine on Music. Book I-VI. Annapolis: St. John’s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Mark C. 1987. Erring: A Postmodern a/Theology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Bible, New Revised Standard Version.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Christoph. 2001. Johann Sebastian Bach: The Learned Musician. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, G.C. (2017). Theological Stocktaking with Pierre Boulez. In: Music and the Generosity of God. Radical Theologies and Philosophies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69493-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics