Skip to main content

Contingency Management for Event-Driven Business Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences (OTM 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10573))

Abstract

In the past two decades, business process research has focused on process flexibility to facilitate the operation of business processes in an open and dynamic environment. This is important to ensure that processes accurately reflect and handle changes occurring in the real-world. While substantial existing work has investigated changes in business processes, the contingency management of running processes did not receive sufficient attention, mainly because events are considered to be immutable. Yet high-level business events have been shown to be subject to changes. To be able to capture such changes, business events have to be considered as bitemporal, where the occurrence (scheduled) time and detection time of events are differentiated. Modifying an event’s content may result in a contingency that has to be handled appropriately. For instance, the scheduled time of a planned event in a process may change, which has an impact on subsequent events. In this work, we present an approach to capture bitemporal mutable events in business processes, assess the scope of changes and provide an approach for specifying contingency plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Client is a preferred term in homecare organisation while patient is the preferred term in hospitals.

  2. 2.

    ADLs are activities that people do daily without requiring assistance such as eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, walking, and continence. Some clients may require assistance with these activities (see http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/adl.asp).

  3. 3.

    http://dome.ggrossmann.com/.

References

  1. Ayora, C., Torres, V., Reichert, M., Weber, B., Pelechano, V.: Towards run-time flexibility for process families: open issues and research challenges. In: Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 477–488. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36285-9_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Bucchiarone, A., Marconi, A., Pistore, M., Raik, H.: Dynamic adaptation of fragment-based and context-aware business processes. In: Proceedings of ICWS, pp. 33–41, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  3. Buchmann, A., Appel, S., Freudenreich, T., Frischbier, S., Guerrero, P.E.: From calls to events: architecting future BPM systems. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds.) BPM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7481, pp. 17–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. da Costa, L.A.G., Pires, P.F., Mattoso, M.: Automatic composition of web services with contingency plans. In: Proceedings of ICWS, pp. 454–461, July 2004

    Google Scholar 

  5. Damaggio, E., Hull, R., Vaculín, R.: On the equivalence of incremental and fixpoint semantics for business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles. Inf. Syst. 38(4), 561–584 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donaldson, L.: The Contingency Theory of Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Furche, T., Grasso, G., Huemer, M., Schallhart, C., Schrefl, M.: PeaCE-Ful web event extraction and processing as bitemporal mutable events. ACM Trans. Web 10(3), 16:1–416:7 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gou, Y., Ghose, A., Chang, C.-F., Dam, H.K., Miller, A.: Semantic monitoring and compensation in socio-technical processes. In: Indulska, M., Purao, S. (eds.) ER 2014. LNCS, vol. 8823, pp. 117–126. Springer, Cham (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12256-4_12

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guide, V.R., Jayaraman, V., Linton, J.D.: Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery. J. Oper. Manag. 21(3), 259–279 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, S.-K., Chakravarthy, S.: Temporal databases with two-dimensional time: modeling and implementation of multihistory. Inf. Sci. 80(1), 43–89 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Chesani, F., Mello, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring business constraints with the event calculus. ACM TIST 10, 17:1–17:30 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Niehaves, B., Poeppelbuss, J., Plattfaut, R., Becker, J.: BPM capability development - a matter of contingencies. Bus. Process Manag. J. 20(1), 90–106 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pichler, H., Wenger, M., Eder, J.: Composing time-aware web service orchestrations. In: Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 349–363. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02144-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Ploesser, K., Peleg, M., Soffer, P., Rosemann, M., Recker, J.C.: Learning from context to improve business processes. BPTrends 6(1), 1–7 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S., Dadam, P.: Flexibility in process-aware information systems. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II. LNCS, vol. 5460, pp. 115–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-00899-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosemann, M., Recker, J.: Context-aware process design: exploring the extrinsic drivers for process flexibility. In: Proceedings of BPMDS@CAISE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schonenberg, H., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W.: Process flexibility: a survey of contemporary approaches. In: Dietz, J.L.G., Albani, A., Barjis, J. (eds.) CIAO!/EOMAS 2008. LNBIP, vol. 10, pp. 16–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-68644-6_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Snodgrass, R.T.: Temporal databases. In: Frank, A.U., Campari, I., Formentini, U. (eds.) GIS 1992. LNCS, vol. 639, pp. 22–64. Springer, Heidelberg (1992). doi:10.1007/3-540-55966-3_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Sousa, R., Voss, C.A.: Contingency research in operations management practices. J. Oper. Manag. 26(6), 697–713 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sripada, S.M.: A logical framework for temporal deductive databases. In: Proceedings of VLDB, pp. 171–182 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Trkman, P.: The critical success factors of business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 30(2), 125–134 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Rosemann, M., Dumas, M.: Deadline-based escalation in process-aware information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 43(2), 492–511 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change patterns and change support features - enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data Knowl. Eng. 66(3), 438–466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wondoh, J., Grossmann, G., Gasevic, D., Reichert, M., Schrefl, M., Stumptner, M.: Bitemporal support for business process contingency management. In: Jeusfeld, M.A., Karlapalem, K. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9382, pp. 109–118. Springer, Cham (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25747-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Wondoh, J., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M.: Propagation of event content modification in business processes. In: Sheng, Q.Z., Stroulia, E., Tata, S., Bhiri, S. (eds.) ICSOC 2016. LNCS, vol. 9936, pp. 70–84. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46295-0_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Wondoh, J., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M.: Utilising bitemporal information for business process contingency management. In: Proceedings of APCCM, pp. 45:1–45:10. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was partially funded by the Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre (D2D CRC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Wondoh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wondoh, J., Grossmann, G., Stumptner, M. (2017). Contingency Management for Event-Driven Business Processes. In: Panetto, H., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69461-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69462-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics