Abstract
Process mining is not only about discovery and conformance checking of business processes. It is also focused on enhancing processes to improve the business performance. While from a business perspective this third main stream is definitely as important as the others if not even more, little research work has been conducted. The existing body of work on process enhancement mainly focuses on ensuring that the process model is adapted to incorporate behavior that is observed in reality. It is less focused on improving the performance of the process. This paper reports on a methodology that creates an enhanced model with an improved performance level. The enhancements of the model limit incorporated behavior to only those parts that do not violate any business rules. Finally, the enhanced model is kept as close to the original model as possible. The practical relevance and feasibility of the methodology is assessed through two case studies. The result shows that the process models improved through our methodology, in comparison with state-of the art techniques, have improved KPI levels while still adhering to the desired prescriptive model.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In the algorithm, symbol \(\oplus \) identifies the concatenation of two sequences. Given an alignment \(\gamma \), \(\gamma (i)\) denotes the i-th element of the alignment.
- 2.
Here we talk in term of classification tree, which can be a decision or regression tree. Decision trees are used when the KPI values are discrete; otherwise, we use regression tree.
- 3.
Notation \(\{ d_1 \rightarrowtail c_1,\ldots ,d_n \rightarrowtail c_n\}\) indicates a function f with domain \(\{d_1,\ldots ,d_n\}\) in which \(f(d_1)=c_1, \ldots , f(d_n)=c_n\).
- 4.
Step 2.1 is a conceptual step. In practice, one does not need to recompute the alignments for the cluster logs as one can simply reuse the alignments obtained as result of Step 1.1.
- 5.
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)
Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Model repair - aligning process models to reality. Inform. Syst. 47, 220–243 (2015)
Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisc. Rev Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)
de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs. Inform. Syst. 56, 235–257 (2016)
Kalsing, A.C., do Nascimento, G.S., Iochpe, C., Thom, L.H.: An incremental process mining approach to extract knowledge from legacy systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 79–88. IEEE (2010)
Sun, W., Li, T., Peng, W., Sun, T.: Incremental workflow mining with optional patterns and its application to production printing process. Int. J. Intell. Contr. Syst. 12(1), 44–55 (2007)
Buijs, J.C.A.M., La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA 2012). LNBIP, vol. 162, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Schunselaar, D.M.: Configurable process trees: elicitation, analysis, and enactment. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2016)
Polyvyanyy, A., Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A., Wynn, M.: Impact-driven process model repair. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 25(4), 28 (2016)
Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: Discovering reference models by mining process variants using a heuristic approach. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 344–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_23
Gambini, M., La Rosa, M., Migliorini, S., Hofstede, A.H.M.: Automated error correction of business process models. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 148–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_14
Lohmann, N.: Correcting deadlocking service choreographies using a simulation-based graph edit distance. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_12
Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Simplifying discovered process models in a controlled manner. Inform. Syst. 38(4), 585–605 (2013)
International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13053:2011 quantitative methods in process improvement - Six Sigma - part 1: DMAIC methodology, September 2011
Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M.: Handling concept drift in process mining. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_30
Bolt, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Scientific workflows for process mining: building blocks, scenarios, and implementation. STTT 18(6), 607–628 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dees, M., de Leoni, M., Mannhardt, F. (2017). Enhancing Process Models to Improve Business Performance: A Methodology and Case Studies. In: Panetto, H., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69461-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69462-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)