Skip to main content

Enhancing Process Models to Improve Business Performance: A Methodology and Case Studies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences (OTM 2017)

Abstract

Process mining is not only about discovery and conformance checking of business processes. It is also focused on enhancing processes to improve the business performance. While from a business perspective this third main stream is definitely as important as the others if not even more, little research work has been conducted. The existing body of work on process enhancement mainly focuses on ensuring that the process model is adapted to incorporate behavior that is observed in reality. It is less focused on improving the performance of the process. This paper reports on a methodology that creates an enhanced model with an improved performance level. The enhancements of the model limit incorporated behavior to only those parts that do not violate any business rules. Finally, the enhanced model is kept as close to the original model as possible. The practical relevance and feasibility of the methodology is assessed through two case studies. The result shows that the process models improved through our methodology, in comparison with state-of the art techniques, have improved KPI levels while still adhering to the desired prescriptive model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the algorithm, symbol \(\oplus \) identifies the concatenation of two sequences. Given an alignment \(\gamma \), \(\gamma (i)\) denotes the i-th element of the alignment.

  2. 2.

    Here we talk in term of classification tree, which can be a decision or regression tree. Decision trees are used when the KPI values are discrete; otherwise, we use regression tree.

  3. 3.

    Notation \(\{ d_1 \rightarrowtail c_1,\ldots ,d_n \rightarrowtail c_n\}\) indicates a function f with domain \(\{d_1,\ldots ,d_n\}\) in which \(f(d_1)=c_1, \ldots , f(d_n)=c_n\).

  4. 4.

    Step 2.1 is a conceptual step. In practice, one does not need to recompute the alignments for the cluster logs as one can simply reuse the alignments obtained as result of Step 1.1.

  5. 5.

    http://www.promtools.org/doku.php?id=prom66.

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Data Science in Action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Model repair - aligning process models to reality. Inform. Syst. 47, 220–243 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adriansyah, A., van Dongen, B.F.: Replaying history on process models for conformance checking and performance analysis. Wiley Interdisc. Rev Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2), 182–192 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dees, M.: A general process mining framework for correlating, predicting and clustering dynamic behavior based on event logs. Inform. Syst. 56, 235–257 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalsing, A.C., do Nascimento, G.S., Iochpe, C., Thom, L.H.: An incremental process mining approach to extract knowledge from legacy systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, pp. 79–88. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sun, W., Li, T., Peng, W., Sun, T.: Incremental workflow mining with optional patterns and its application to production printing process. Int. J. Intell. Contr. Syst. 12(1), 44–55 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Buijs, J.C.A.M., La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A., van Dongen, B.F., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis. Proceedings of the Second International Symposium Data-Driven Process Discovery and Analysis (SIMPDA 2012). LNBIP, vol. 162, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schunselaar, D.M.: Configurable process trees: elicitation, analysis, and enactment. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Polyvyanyy, A., Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Ter Hofstede, A., Wynn, M.: Impact-driven process model repair. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. (TOSEM) 25(4), 28 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: Discovering reference models by mining process variants using a heuristic approach. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 344–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-03848-8_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gambini, M., La Rosa, M., Migliorini, S., Hofstede, A.H.M.: Automated error correction of business process models. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 148–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lohmann, N.: Correcting deadlocking service choreographies using a simulation-based graph edit distance. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85758-7_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fahland, D., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Simplifying discovered process models in a controlled manner. Inform. Syst. 38(4), 585–605 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 13053:2011 quantitative methods in process improvement - Six Sigma - part 1: DMAIC methodology, September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Žliobaitė, I., Pechenizkiy, M.: Handling concept drift in process mining. In: Mouratidis, H., Rolland, C. (eds.) CAiSE 2011. LNCS, vol. 6741, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21640-4_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Bolt, A., de Leoni, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Scientific workflows for process mining: building blocks, scenarios, and implementation. STTT 18(6), 607–628 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Dees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dees, M., de Leoni, M., Mannhardt, F. (2017). Enhancing Process Models to Improve Business Performance: A Methodology and Case Studies. In: Panetto, H., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences. OTM 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10573. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69462-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69461-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69462-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics