Skip to main content

Development of Teledentistry: From Pilot Projects to Successful Implementation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover e-Health Care in Dentistry and Oral Medicine

Abstract

As of telemedecine initiatives, teledentistry innovations have great potentials to enhance accessibility to dental care, reduce cost of care and enhance quality of dental care. Despite such potentials, many teledentistry innovations remain in the pilot phase or are not successfully implemented. To explain this paradoxe, we discuss the adoption, and the implementation of teledentistry in regular healthcare practices and the evaluation of the success of teledentitry projetc. We propose to identify the main critical factors for teledentistery initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bradley M, Black P, Noble S, Thompson R, Lamey PJ. Application of teledentistry in oral medicine in a community dental service, N. Ireland. Br Dent J. 2010;209:399–404. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.928.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Golder DT, Brennan KA. Practicing dentistry in the age of telemedicine. J Am Dent Assoc. 2000;1939(131):734–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jampani ND, Nutalapati R, Dontula BSK, Boyapati R. Applications of teledentistry: a literature review and update. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2011;1:37–44. https://doi.org/10.4103/2231-0762.97695.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Scuffham PA, Steed M. An economic evaluation of the Highlands and Islands teledentistry project. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8:165–77. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763302320118915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhambal A, Saxena S, Balsaraf SV. Teledentistry: potentials unexplored! J Int Oral Health. 2010;2:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sanchez Dils E, Lefebvre C, Abeyta K. Teledentistry in the United States: a new horizon of dental care. Int J Dent Hyg. 2004;2:161–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5037.2004.00093.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hu PJ-H, Chau PYK, Sheng ORL. Adoption of telemedicine technology by healthcare organizations: an exploratory study. J Organ Comput Electron Commer. 2002;12:197–221. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE1203_01.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mariño R, Ghanim A. Teledentistry: a systematic review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:179–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X13479704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jackson DE, McClean SI. Trends in telemedicine assessment indicate neglect of key criteria for predicting success. J Health Organ Manag. 2012;26:508–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hu PH, Chau PY, Chan YK, Kwok JCK. Investigating technology implementation in a neurosurgical teleconsultation program: a case study in Hong Kong. In: proceedings of the 34th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences. Washington, DC: IEEE; 2001. p. 9pp.

    Google Scholar 

  11. EHTEL. Sustainable telemedicine: paradigms for future-proof healthcare—eHealth Portal for Europe [WWW Document]. 2008. URL https://www.ehtel.eu/references-files/tf-cdm-telemedicine/ehtel-briefing-paper-sustainable-telemedicine-paradigms-for-future-proof-healthcare. Accessed 28 Apr 16.

  12. Ekeland AG, Grøttland A. Assessment of MAST in European patient-centered telemedicine pilots. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015;31:304–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462315000574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kidholm K, Ekeland AG, Jensen LK, Rasmussen J, Pedersen CD, Bowes A, Flottorp SA, Bech M. A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: MAST. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28:44–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462311000638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform. 2010;79(11):736–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmed- inf.2010.08.006 20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Masella C, Zanaboni P. Assessment models for telemedicine services in National Health Systems. Int J Healthc Technol Manag. 2008;9:446–72. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHTM.2008.020198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollingworth W, Devine EB, Hansen RN, Lawless NM, Comstock BA, Wilson-Norton JL, Tharp KL, Sullivan SL. The impact of e-prescribing on prescriber and staff time in ambulatory care clinics: a time–motion study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14(6):722–30. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M2377.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson RR. IT project management: infamous failures, classic mistakes, and best practices. MIS Q Exec. 2007;6(2):67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paul DL, Pearlson KE, McDaniel RR. Assessing technological barriers to telemedicine: technology-management implications. IEEE Trans Eng Manag. 1999;46:279–88. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.775280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tanriverdi H, Iacono CS. Diffusion of telemedicine: a knowledge barrier perspective. Telemed J. 1999;5:223–44. https://doi.org/10.1089/107830299311989.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Broens THF, in’t Veld RMHAH, Vollenbroek-Hutten MMR, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJM. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare. 2007;13:303–9. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763307781644951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitch CJ, Briggs JS, Beresford RA. System issues for successful tele-medicine implementation. Health Informatics J. 2000;6:166–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/146045820000600310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boonstra A, Versluis A, Vos JF. Implementing electronic health records in hospitals: a systematic literature review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14(1):370. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-370.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci. 1989;35:982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27:425–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Chau PYK, Hu PJ-H. Investigating healthcare professionals’ decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories. Inf Manag. 2002;39:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(01)00098-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Petcu R, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Bourdon I, Kimble C, Giraudeau N. Acceptance and organizational aspects of oral tele-consultation: a French STUDY. In: 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE; 2016. p. 3124–3132. https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.393.

  27. Whitten PS, Richardson JD. A scientific approach to the assessment of telemedicine acceptance. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8:246–8. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763302320272257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel RN, Antonarakis GS. Factors influencing the adoption and implementation of teledentistry in the UK, with a focus on orthodontics. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2013;41:424–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12029.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zwaanswijk M, Verheij RA, Wiesman FJ, Friele RD. Benefits and problems of electronic information exchange as perceived by health care professionals: an interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11(1):256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ganguly P, Ray P. Software interoperability of telemedicine systems: a CSCW perspective. In: seventh international conference on parallel and distributed systems, 2000. Proceedings. Los Alamitos: IEEE; 2000. p. 349–356. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS.2000.857717.

  31. Romanow D, Cho S, Straub D. Riding the wave: past trends and future directions for health IT research. MIS Q. 2012;36:iii–A18.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Or CK, Karsh BT. A systematic review of patient acceptance of consumer health information technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(4):550–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Barki H, Rivard S, Talbot J. Toward an assessment of software development risk. J Manag Inf Syst. 1993;10(2):203–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Nicolini D. The work to make telemedicine work: a social and articulative view. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62:2754–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res. 2014;24:682–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314528809.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Giraudeau N, Valcarcel J, Tassery H, Levallois B, Cuisinier F, Tramini P, Vialla F. Projet e-DENT : téléconsultation bucco-dentaire en EHPAD. Eur Res Telemed. 2015;3:51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurtel.2014.04.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen S, Cheng A, Mehta K. A review of telemedicine business models. Telemed e-Health. 2013;19(4):287–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Ologeanu-Taddei R, Bourdon I, Kimble C, Giraudeau N. The acceptability of teleconsultations in teledentistry: a case study. In: Cruz-Cunha M, Miranda I, editors. Encyclopedia of e-health and telemedicine. Hershey: IGI Global; 2016. p. 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-9978-6.ch072.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bhattacherjee A, Hikmet N. Physicians’ resistance toward healthcare information technology: a theoretical model and empirical test. Eur J Inf Syst. 2007;16:725–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lapointe L, Rivard S. Getting physicians to accept new information technology: insights from case studies. Can Med Assoc J. 2006;174:1573–8. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.050281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q. 2005;29:461–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Mintzberg H. The structuring of organization: a synthesis of the research. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Berg M. Implementing information systems in health care organizations: myths and challenges. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2001;64(2):143–56.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bala H, Venkatesh V. Changes in employees’ job characteristics during an enterprise system implementation: a latent growth modeling perspective. MIS Q. 2013;37:1113–A7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Davidson EJ, Chismar WG. The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry. MIS Q. 2007;31:739–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wade V, Eliott J. The role of the champion in telehealth service development: a qualitative analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2012;18:490–2. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2012.GTH115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Wade VA, Hamlyn JS. The relationship between telehealth and information technology ranges from that of uneasy bedfellows to creative partnerships. J Telemed Telecare. 2013;19:401–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X13506533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Vuononvirta T, Timonen M, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, Timonen O, Ylitalo K, Kanste O, Taanila A. The attitudes of multiprofessional teams to telehealth adoption in northern Finland health centres. J Telemed Telecare. 2009;15(6):290–6. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Cresswell K, Sheikh A. Organizational issues in the implementation and adoption of health information technology innovations: an interpretative review. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2013;82(5):e73–e86.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Anderson CL, Agarwal R. The digitization of healthcare: boundary risks, emotion, and consumer willingness to disclose personal health information. Inf Syst Res. 2011;22:469–90. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Angst CM, Agarwal R. Adoption of electronic health records in the presence of privacy concerns: the elaboration likelihood model and individual persuasion. MIS Q. 2009;33:339–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roxana Ologeanu-Taddei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bourdon, I., Ologeanu-Taddei, R., Kimble, C. (2018). Development of Teledentistry: From Pilot Projects to Successful Implementation. In: Giraudeau, N. (eds) e-Health Care in Dentistry and Oral Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69450-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69450-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69449-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69450-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics