Abstract
This chapter will examine the structure and function of historical and cultural narratives that may facilitate the transmission of culture and historical memory across generations. The need for intercultural understanding in a world plagued by intercultural conflict is compelling and profound. Intercultural understanding is a necessary foundation for world peace. The purpose of this inquiry is to examine how intercultural understanding may be enhanced through an understanding of peoples’ history and historical narratives. Historical narratives influence how people see the world and their place in it and the behaviors needed to guide them safely and successfully through it. Numerous scholars have proposed that virtually all human knowledge is based on stories constructed around past experiences. New experiences are interpreted in terms of old stories. The content of story memories depends on whether and how they are told to others, and these reconstituted memories form the basis of the individuals (and communities) remembered self. Stories about experiences and the experiences of others are the fundamental constituents of human memory, knowledge and communication. The experience of significant and traumatic events is transmitted across generations via narratives. These are stories embedded with meaning and explanation. Meaning is an essential human need because we seek and require meaning to maintain a sense of psychological equanimity in the face of the demands of life in an existentially threatening human condition. Narratives are vehicles of meaning. Humans act on the basis of the meaning they attribute to behaviors, situations and events. Therefore, a careful and empathetic (non-judgmental) listening to the narratives of those with who we are in conflict is an essential component of intercultural understanding and world peace. The purpose of this inquiry is to examine how intercultural understanding may be enhanced through an understanding of peoples’ history and historical narratives. Historical narratives influence how people see the world and their place in it and the behaviors needed to guide them safely and successfully through it. The experience of significant and traumatic events is transmitted across generations via narratives. These are stories embedded with meaning and explanation. Meaning is an essential human need because we seek and require meaning to maintain a sense of psychological equanimity in the face of the demands of life in an existentially threatening human condition. Narratives are vehicles of meaning. Humans act on the basis of the meaning they attribute to behaviors, situations and events. Therefore, a careful and empathetic (non-judgmental) listening to the narratives of those with who we are in conflict is an essential component of intercultural understanding and world peace.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ba-Isa, M.Y. (2008, June 6). Cultural empathy doesn't need your sympathy. Arab News.
Bar-Tal, D., & Salomon, G. (2006). Israeli-jewish narratives of the israeli-palestinian conflict. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), Israeli and palestinian narratives of conflict: History’s double helix. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Becker, E. (1975). Escape from evil. New York: Free Press.
Bruner, J. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical Inquiry, 18(1), 1–21.
Burns, J.F. (2009, June 20). Ayatollah, calling Britain enemy no. 1, taps into deep distrust rooted in history. The New York Times, p. A7.
Conrow, J. (2009, August 12–18). Another side of statehood. Honolulu Weekly.
Crossely, M. L. (2000). Introducing narrative psychology: Self, trauma and the construction of meaning. Buckingham, U.K.: Open University Press.
Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., & Pyszczynski, T. (1997). Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural world views: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 61–139). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Hartling, L. M., & Luchetta, T. (1999). Humiliation: Assessing the impact of derision, degradation and debasement. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 19(4), 259–278.
Hirschfield, R. (2007, May 1). Norma Musih, Zochrot and the Nakba. Washington Report on Middle East Affairs. Washington, DC.
Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Howard, G. (1991). Culture tales. American Psychologist, 47(3), 187–197.
Ivey, A., Ivey, M., & Simek-Morgan, L. (1993). Counseling and psychotherapy: A multicultural perspective (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61, 651–670.
Memmi, A. (2006). Decolonization and the decolonized. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Liu, J. H., Paez, D., Slawuta, P., Cabecinhas, R., Techio, E., Kokdemir, D., Sen, R., Vincze, O., Muluk, H., Wang, F., & Zlobina, A. (2009). Representing world history in the 21st century: The impact of 9/11, the Iraq war, and the nation-state on dynamics of collective remembering. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(40), 667–692.
Pipes, R. (2009, August 24). Pride and power. The Wall Street Journal, p. A1.
Price, L. (2007). Narrative mediation: A transformative approach to conflict resolution. African Initiative for Mediation.
Pyszczynski, T., Abdollahi, A., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., & Weise, D. (2006). Mortality salience, martyrdom, and military might: The Great Satan versus the axis of evil. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 525–537.
Pyszczynski, T., Motyl, M., & Abdollahi, A. (2009). Righteous violence: Killing for god, country, freedom, and justice. Interdisciplinary Research on Terrorism and Political Violence, 1, 13–40.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Ross, M. H. (2001). The political psychology of competing narratives: September 11 and beyond. Brooklyn, NY: The Social Science Research Council.
Rotberg, R. I. (Ed.). (2006). Israeli and Palestinian Narratives of conflict: History’s double helix. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Salzman, M. (2005). Contextualizing the symptom in multicultural consultation: Anger in the family a cultural-historical context. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 16(3), 223–237.
Salzman, M. B. (2008). Globalization, religious fundamentalism and the need for meaning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 32(4), 318–327.
Shank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1995). Knowledge and memory: The real story. In R. S. Wyer Jr. (Ed.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. VIII, pp. 1–86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Van Der Zee, K. I., & Van Oudenhoven, J. P. (2000). The multicultural personality questionnaire: A multidimensional instrument of multicultural effectiveness. European Journal of Personality, 14, 291–309.
Wong, G. (2009, March 13). Tibet: 2 sides see history differently. Honolulu Star Bulletin, p. 2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salzman, M.B. (2018). Historical Narratives: Stories We Live By. In: A Psychology of Culture. International and Cultural Psychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69420-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69420-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69418-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69420-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)