Sustainable Energy Mix in Fragile Environments: A Transdisciplinary Framework for Action

Part of the Social and Ecological Interactions in the Galapagos Islands book series (SESGI)


The concept of “energy mix” is a function of context, scale, and energy source availability. To date, renewable energy sources (such as wind, solar, micro hydro, and biofuels) have been viewed as technical solutions primarily for local and regional needs although renewable energy production has the potential to be expanded at much larger scales and in much larger markets. Regardless of the type of energy source, there are always a variety of contextual factors affecting source selection, production, distribution, demand and price. A long-term sustainable approach to designing energy mix in fragile environments needs a strategic approach to identifying factors affecting energy choice limitations and opportunities. Therefore, understanding energy mix alternatives in the context of dynamic interactions among social, economic, and environmental systems is key to implementing sustainable energy mixes in fragile environments. A transdisciplinary approach for integrating knowledge from multiple disciplines for the creation of new knowledge through social learning and partnerships are identified using the Galapagos islands as example.


  1. Balint PJ, Stewart RE, Desai A, Walters LC (2011) Wicked environmental problems. Island Press, Washington DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carvajal P (2012) Galapagos Islands Zero Fossil Fuel Initiative. Ministry of Electricity and Renewable Energy-Ecuador. Retrieved from
  3. Costanza R (2000) Visions of alternative (unpredictable) futures and their use in policy analysis. Conserv Ecol 4(1):5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Doris E, McLaren J, Healey V, Hockett S (2009) State of the States 2009: Renewable Energy Development and the Role of Policy. Technical Report NREL/TP-6A2-46667. October 2009. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable EnergyGoogle Scholar
  5. Dorner D (1996) The logic of failure:recognizing and avoiding error in complex situations. Metropolitan Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Finley R (2013) Energy trends insider. Retrieved on line
  7. Global Sustainable Electricity Partnership (2016) Galapagos San Cristobal Island Wind Project 2003–2016. Retrieved from
  8. Hoffman VH, Trautmann T, Schneider M (2008) A taxonomy of regulatory uncertainty—application to the European emission trading scheme. Environ Sci Pol 11(8):712–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keohane RO, Victor DG (2013) The transnational power of energy. Daedalus J Am Acad Arts Sci 142(1):Winter 2013Google Scholar
  10. Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Acad Manage Rev 23(2):242–266. Retrieved from
  11. REN21 (2016) Renewables 2016 global status report. REN21 Secretariat, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rutherford J, Coutard O (2014) Urban energy transitions: places, processes, and politics of social-technical change. Urban Stud 51(7):1353–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economic effects of climate change. Executive summary. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Stirling A (2014) Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Res Soc Sci 1(2014):83–95. Elsevier LtdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Velasco H (2015) Galapagos airport evolves to renewable energy only. AFP Business Insider (July 18). Retrieved from
  17. Vella H (2016) Galapagos: fragile archipelago switches petrol for renewables., August 31. Kable Intelligence Limited, UK. Retrieved from
  18. Wong PSP, Owczarek A, Murison M, Kefalianos Z, Spinozzi J (2014) Driving construction contractors to adopt carbon reduction strategies—an Australian approach. J Environ Plan Manag 57(10):1465–1483CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Environmental DesignUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Haskayne School of Business, University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations