The Rise and Fall of Neoclassical Finance

Chapter

Abstract

The principles of neoclassical finance can be rationalized in terms of classical game theory, which reduces human behaviour to pure mathematics. The neoclassical finance era started in the early 1950s with the work of Harry Markowitz on portfolio optimization theory, followed by the work of Modigliani and Miller on capital structure and the work of Sharpe and Lintner on asset pricing models, including the CAPM, and the development of the efficient market hypothesis by Eugene Fama. While the principles of neoclassical finance, as the mainstream school of thought, were at one time unquestionable, some market events pose a challenge to the soundness of these principles, particularly the propositions that market prices reflect the intrinsic values of the underlying assets.

Keywords

Neoclassical finance CAPM Efficient market hypothesis Capital structure 

References

  1. Anderson, S., & Born, J. (2002). Closed-End Fund Pricing: Theories and Evidence. Norwell, MA: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Black, F. (1993). Beta and Return. Journal of Portfolio Management, 20, 8–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, J. (1998). Revisiting the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Dow Jones Asset Manager, May/June, 20–28.Google Scholar
  5. Caginalp, G., & DeSantis, M. (2011). A Paradigm for Quantitative Behavioral Finance. American Behavioral Scientist, 55, 1014–1034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplinger, D. (2012, December 12). Negative-Beta Stocks: Worth Buying? https://www.fool.com/how-to-invest/2012/12/12/negative-beta-stocks-worth-buying.aspx.
  7. Cassidy, J. (2010, January 11). After the Blowup: Laissez-Faire Economists Do Some Soul-Searching—And Finger-Pointing. The New Yorker.Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, N. (2012, January 24). Efficient Markets Hypothesis Inefficient. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  9. Daniel, K., & Titman, S. (1997). Evidence on the Characteristics of Cross Sectional Variation in Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 52, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dehnad, K. (2009). Efficient Market Hypothesis: Another Victim of the Great Recession. Journal of Financial Transformation, 27, 35–36.Google Scholar
  11. Fama, E. (1965). Random Walks in Stock Market Prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 21, 55–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. Journal of Finance, 25, 383–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fama, E., & French, K. (1993). Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds. Journal of Financial Economics, 33, 3–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fama, E., & French, K. (1996). Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies. Journal of Finance, 51, 55–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fama, E., & French, K. (2004). The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fama, E. & MacBeth, J. (1973). Risk, Return, and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607–636.Google Scholar
  17. Fox, J. (2009). The Myth of Rational Market. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  18. Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y. & Zhu, H. (2015). … and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns, Journal of Financial Studies (published online).Google Scholar
  19. Haugen, R. (1999). The Inefficient Stock Market. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Jagannathan, R., & McGrattan, E. R. (1995). The CAPM Debate. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review, 19, 2–17.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, M. (1978). Some Anomalous Evidence Regarding Market Efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics, 6, 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jerusalem Post. (2009, June 11). Has ‘Guiding Model’ for Global Markets Gone Haywire?Google Scholar
  23. Kothari, S. P., Shanken, J., & Sloan, R. G. (1995). Another Look at the Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance, 50, 185–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lai, T.-Y. (2011). Yes, the CAPM is Dead. Paper presented at the 19th annual conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting and Management, Taipei, 8–9 July.Google Scholar
  25. Leamer, E. (1983). Let’s Take the Con Out of Econometrics. American Economic Review, 73, 31–43.Google Scholar
  26. Lintner, J. (1965). The Valuation of Risky Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas, R. E. (1978). Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy. Econometrica, 46, 1429–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7, 77–91.Google Scholar
  29. Merton, R. C. (1973). An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica, 41, 867–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The Cost of Capital. Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.Google Scholar
  31. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1963). Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. American Economic Review, 53, 433–443.Google Scholar
  32. Moosa, I. A. (2002). Exchange Rates and Fundamentals: A Microeconomic Approach. Economia Internazionale, 55, 551–571.Google Scholar
  33. Moosa, I. A. (2012). The Failure of Financial Econometrics: “Stir-Fry” Regressions as an Illustration. Journal of Financial Transformation, 34, 43–50.Google Scholar
  34. Moosa, I. A. (2017a). Econometrics as a Con Art: Exposing the Shortcomings and Abuses of Econometrics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moosa, I. A. (2017b). The Econometrics of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Applied Economics, 49, 4927–4945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Moosa, I. A. (2017c). Publish or Perish: Perceived Benefits versus Unintended Consequences. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. (in press).Google Scholar
  37. Nocera, J. (2009, June 5). Poking Holes in a Theory on Markets. New York Times.Google Scholar
  38. Pasour, E. C. (1989). The Efficient-Market Hypothesis and Entrepreneurship. Review of Austrian Economics, 3, 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quiggin, J. (2009). Six Refuted Doctrines. Economic Papers, 28, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ross, S. A. (1978). The Current Status of the Capital Asset Pricing Model. Journal of Finance, 33, 885–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. J. (1982). Capital Market Theory—A Case Study in Methodological Conflict. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 9, 443–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442.Google Scholar
  43. Shiller, R. J. (2000). Irrational Exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Shiller, R. J. (2003). From Efficient Markets Theory to Behavioral Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 84–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shostak, F. (1997). In Defense of Fundamental Analysis: A Critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis. Review of Austrian Economics, 10, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Siegel, J. (2010, April 9). The Efficient Market Theory and the Recent Financial Crisis. The Inagural Conference of the Institute of New Economic Thinking, King’s College, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  47. Statman, M. (1999). Behavioral Finance: Past Battles and Future Engagements. Financial Analysts Journal, November/December 18–27.Google Scholar
  48. Subrahmanyam, A. (2010). The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns: What Have We Learnt from the Past Twenty-Five Years of Research? European Financial Management, 16, 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Economist. (2011, February 26). Killing off the Monster.Google Scholar
  50. Volcker, P. (2011, November 24). Financial Reform: Unfinished Business, New York Review of Books. http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/nov/24/financial-reform-unfinished-business/.
  51. von Mises, L. (1998). Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises institute.Google Scholar
  52. Washington Post (2009, June 7). Book Review: ‘The Myth of the Rational Market’ by Justin Fox. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/05/AR2009060502053.html.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMITMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.School of CommerceUNISAAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations