Advertisement

Managing Patella Defects

  • Fred D. Cushner
  • Stephen Petis
  • Michael TauntonEmail author
  • Arlen Hanssen
  • Michael D. RiesEmail author
  • Kelly G. VinceEmail author
  • Michel Malo
Chapter

Abstract

It is well known that patella resurfacing has its limits. Severe patella bone loss can occur in the primary knee where significant patella bone loss can make it difficult to perform a patella resurfacing. While the ultimate limit as to the smallest amount of residual bone will allow a patella resurfacing to be performed, it is commonly believed that at least 12 mm is needed to avoid complications of resurfacing.

Keywords

Patella Patellar bone grafting Patellar augments Gullwing patellar osteotomy Osteolytic deformity 

References

  1. 1.
    Dennis D. Patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg. 1992;5:156–66.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Healy W, Wasilewski S, Takei R, Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty: correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. J Arthroplast. 1995;10(2):197–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdel M, Parratte S, Budhiparama N. The patella in total knee arthroplasty: to resurface or not is the question. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):117–24.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dalury D, Pomeroy D, Gorab R, Adams M. Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplast. 2013;28(8 Suppl):120–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rhoads D, Noble P, Reuben J, Mahoney O, Tullos H. The effect of femoral component position on patellar tracking after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(260):43–51.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rorabeck C, Mehin R, Barrack R. Patellar options in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;416:84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tanikawa H, Tada M, Harato K, Okuma K, Nagura T. Influence of total knee arthroplasty on patellar kinematics and patellofemoral pressure. J Arthroplast. 2017;32(1):280–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hanssen AD. Bone grafting for severe patellar bone loss during revision knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(2):171–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nelson C, Lonner J, Lahiji A, Kim J, Lotke P. Use of trabecular metal patella for marked patella bone loss during revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2003;18(7 Suppl 1):37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bracey D, Brown M, Beard H, Mannava S, Nazir O, Seyler T, et al. Effects of patellofemoral overstuffing on knee flexion and patellar kinematics following total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int Orthop. 2015;39(9):1715–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Abolghasemian M, Samiezadeh S, Sternheim A, Bougherara H, Barnes C, Backstein D. Effect of patellar thickness on knee flexion in total knee arthroplasty: a biomechanical and experimental study. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(1):80–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fornalski S, McGarry M, Bui C, Kim W, Lee T. Biomechanical effects of joint line elevation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Biomech. 2012;27(8):824–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dennis D, Kim R, Johnson D, Springer B, Fehring T, Sharma A. The John Insall award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):10–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsu H, Luo Z, Rand J, An K. Influence of patellar thickness on patellar tracking and patellofemoral contact characteristics after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1996;11(1):69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cave E, Rowe C. The patella: its importance in derangement of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950;32-A(3):542–53. passimCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Boettner F, Bou Monsef J. Achilles tendon allograft for augmentation of the Hanssen patellar bone grafting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1035–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baldwin JL, House CK. Anatomic dimensions of the patella measured during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2005;20(2):250–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mahmoud AN, Sundberg M, Flivik G. Comparable results with porous metal augments in combination with either cemented or uncemented cups in revision hip arthroplasty: an analysis of one hundred forty-seven revisions at a mean of five years. J Arthroplast. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.007. pii: S0883-5403(16)30892-0 [Epub ahead of print]
  19. 19.
    Mabry TM, Hanssen AD. The role of stems and augments for bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(4 Suppl 1):56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hacking SA, Bobyn JD, Toh K, Tanzer M, Krygier JJ. Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum. J Biomed Mater Res. 2000;52(4):631–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nasser S, Poggie RA. Revision and salvage patellar arthroplasty using a porous tantalum implant. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(5):562–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tigani D, Trentani P, Trentani F, Andreoli I, Sabbioni G, Del Piccolo N. Trabecular metal patella in total knee arthroplasty with patella bone deficiency. Knee. 2009;16(1):46–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kamath AF, Gee AO, Nelson CL, Garino JP, Lotke PA, Lee GC. Porous tantalum patellar components in revision total knee arthroplasty minimum 5-year follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(1):82–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ries MD, Cabalo A, Bozic KJ, Anderson M. Porous tantalum patellar augmentation: the importance of residual bone stock. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;452:166–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kwong Y, Desai VK. The use of a tantalum-based augmentation patella in patients with a previous patellectomy. Knee. 2008;15(2):91–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nanjayan SK, Wilton T. Trabecular metal patella — is it really doomed to fail in the totally patellar-deficient knee? A case report of patellar reconstruction with a novel technique. Knee. 2014;21(3):779–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hozack WJ, Parvizi J. New definition for periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplast. 2011;26(8):1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vince K, Bedard M. Implanting the revision total knee arthroplasty. In: Lotke PA, Lonner J, editors. Master techniques in orthopedic surgery. Baltimore: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2008. p. 203–28.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garcia RM, Kraay MJ, Conroy-Smith PA, Goldberg VM. Management of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(11):2790–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Erak S, Bourne RB, Macdonald SJ, RW MC, Rorabeck CH. The cemented inset biconvex patella in revision knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2009;16(3):211–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kitsugi T, Gustilo RB, Bechtold JE. Results of nonmetal-backed, high-density polyethylene, biconvex patellar prostheses. A 5-7-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplast. 1994;9(2):151–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ritschl P, Machacek F, Strehn L, Kloiber J. Surgical techniques for patella replacement in cases of deficient bone stock in revision TKA. Z Orthop Unfall. 2015;153(3):321–3. article in GermanCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kloiber J, Goldenitsch E, Ritschl P. Patellar bone deficiency in revision total knee arthroplasty. Orthopade. 2016;45(5):433–8. article in GermanCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Vince KG. Avoiding patellar maltracking in total knee arthroplasty. IN: Matsuda S, Lustig S, van der Merwe W, editors. Soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty: Springer; 2017. In press.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vince K. Modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty. In: Lieberman JR, Berry DJ, Azar FM, editors. Advanced reconstruction of the knee. Rosemont IL: American Academy of orthopedic surgeons; 2011. p. 341–54.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Vince KG. The problem total knee replacement: systematic, comprehensive and efficient evaluation. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(11 Suppl A):105–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    The Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). Revision hip and knee arthroplasty supplementary report. 2016.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Merchant AC, Mercer RL, Jacobsen RH, Cool CR. Roentgenographic analysis of patellofemoral congruence. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(7):1391–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wikipedia. Mercedes-Benz 300 SL 2016 [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_300_SL. Accessed 9 Apr 2017.
  40. 40.
    Hungerford DS, Barry M. Biomechanics of the patellofemoral joint. Clin Orthop. 1979;144:9–15.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Berger RA, Crossett LS, Jacobs JJ, Rubash HE. Malrotation causing patellofemoral complications after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:144–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Smith TO, Hunt NJ, Donell ST. The reliability and validity of the Q-angle: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(12):1068–79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vince K, Roidis N, Blackburn D. Gull-wing sagittal patellar osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty. Techniques in Knee Surgery. 2002;1(2):106–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Pagnano MW, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Patellar component resection in revision and reimplantation total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:134–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Barrack RL, Matzkin E, Ingraham R, Engh G, Rorabeck C. Revision knee arthroplasty with patella replacement versus bony shell. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;356:139–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Klein GR, Levine HB, Ambrose JF, Lamothe HC, Hartzband MA. Gull-wing osteotomy for the treatment of the deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(2):249–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gililland J, Erickson J, Pelt C, Hamad N, Anderson M, Peters C. Patelloplasty with gull-wing osteotomy for patellar deficiency in the setting of revision total knee arthroplasty (abstract). Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons. Las Vegas, NV, USA, 26 Mar 2015.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Seo JG, Moon YW, Lee BH, Kim SM. Reconstruction of a deficient patella in revision total knee arthroplasty: results of a new surgical technique using transcortical wiring. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(2):254–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Seo JG, Moon YW, Lim SJ, Lim JS, Kim SM. Augmentation with transcortical wiring of an onlay-type prosthesis for a deficient patella during revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(2):163–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northwell Health Orthopedic InstituteNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA
  3. 3.Reno Orthopaedic ClinicRenoUSA
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Whangarei Medical CentreNorthland District Health BoardWhangareiNew Zealand
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryUniversity of MontrealMontréalCanada
  6. 6.Department of OrthopedicsCIUSSS du Nord-de-l’île-de-MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations