Abstract
The multi-actor nature of urban sustainability transitions challenges existing social fabrics and local governance settings, and raises questions about who takes decisions, with which agenda and to what end. It demands close attention to who are actors involved in transition processes and what are the implications for (changing) roles, responsibilities and relations of actors and networks. This chapter provides an overview of different understandings of actors and roles in transition management in and for cities and how actors are empowered through transition management interventions to advance urban sustainability transitions. We first review different approaches and heuristics to understand actors and roles in transition management and in relation to the underlying goal to influence urban sustainability transitions. These enable to analyse actors and (changing) roles, support the actor selection and enhance reflexivity in transition management processes. We then discuss what the notion of ‘empowerment’ captures in terms of how actors (re-)define, develop and enact roles and relationships in the pursuit of urban sustainability transitions as a result of transition management interventions in cities. We exemplify our reflections with insights from our empirical experiences with transition management processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apajalahti E-L (2012) The role of large incumbent energy companies in energy system transition – The case of Finland’s “coal coast”. Paper präsentiert auf IST 2012 – International Conference on Sustainability Transitions. Lyngby, Denmark 29–31 August 2012
Avelino F (2009) Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Sci 42:369–390
Avelino F (2011) Power in transition. Empowering discourses on sustainability transitions. PhD Thesis: Erasmus University of Rotterdam
Avelino F, Rotmans J (2009) Power in transition: an interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. Eur J Soc Theory 12:543
Avelino F, Wittmayer JM (2015) Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: a multi-actor perspective. J Environ Policy Plan. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
Bartels KPR, Wittmayer JM (2014) Symposium introduction: usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies. Crit Policy Stud 8(4):397–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.957335
Bauknecht D, Brohmann B, Grießhammer R (2015) Transformationsstrategien und Models of Change für nachhaltigen gesellschaftlichen Wandel: Gesellschaftlicher Wandel als Mehrebenenansatz. Bericht des AP2. Bundesumweltamt, Dessau-Roßlau. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/gesellschaftlicher-wandel-als-mehrebenenansatz. Letzter Zugriff: 01.03.2016
Brown RR, Farrelly MA, Loorbach D (2013) Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: the case of Melbourne’s stormwater management. Glob Environ Chang 23(4):701–718
Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V (2013) Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(3):361–375
Bulkeley H, Castán Broto V, Hodson M, Marvin S (eds) (2011) Cities and low carbon transitions. Routledge, London
Castán Broto V, Bulkeley H (2013) A survey of urban climate change experiments in 100 cities. Glob Environ Chang 23(2013):92–102
Clarke J (2005) New Labour’s citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned? Crit Soc Policy 25(4):447–463
Davies AL, White RM (2012) Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. J Environ Manag 112:160–169
De Haan J, Rotmans J (2011) Patterns in transitions: understanding complex chains of change. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 78(1):90–102
Duineveld M, Beunen R, van Ark RGH, van Ssche KAM, During R (2007) The difference between knowing the path and walking the path: een essay over het terugkerend maakbaarheidsdenken in beleidsonderzoek. Wageningen University, Leerstoelgroep Sociaal-ruimtelijke Analyse, Wageningen
Evers A, Laville JL (2004) The third sector in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northhampton/Massachusets
Farla J, Markard J, Raven R, Coenen L (2012) Sustainability transitions in the making: a closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79(6):991–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001
Fischer L-B, Newig J (2016) Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: a systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability 8(5):476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476
Frantzeskaki N, de Haan H (2009) Transitions: two steps from theory to policy. Futures 41(9):593–606
Frantzeskaki N, Tefrati N (2016) A transformative vision unlocks the innovative potential of Aberdeen City, UK. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer JM, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 49–68
Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D, Meadowcroft J (2012) Governing societal transitions to sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev 15(1):19–36
Frantzeskaki N, Bach M, Hölscher K, Wittmayer J (2014a) Applications of transition management: taking stock of 13 years of transition management and lessons for future research, 5th International Sustainability Transitions (IST) conference, 27–29 August 2014, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Frantzeskaki N, Wittmayer J, Loorbach D (2014b) The role of partnerships in ‘realizing’ urban sustainability in Rotterdam’s City Ports Area, the Netherlands. J Clean Prod 65:406–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.023
Garud R, Kumaraswamy A, Karnøe P (2010) Path dependence or path creation? J Manag Stud 47:760–774
Geels FW (2011) The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to seven criticisms. Environ Innov Soc Trans 1:24–40
Geels F (2014) Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Cult Soc 31(5):21–40
Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Res Policy 36:399–417
Genus A, Coles A-M (2008) Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Res Policy 37(9):1436–1445
Grimm N, Faeth S, Golubiewski N, Redman C, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs J (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760
Grin J (2010) Understanding transitions from a governance perspective. In: Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (eds) Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New York
Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: new directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New York/Oxford
Hendriks C (2009) Policy design without democracy? Making democratic sense of transition management. Policy Sci 42(4):341–368
Hendriks CM, Grin J (2007) Contextualising reflexive governance: the politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. J Environ Policy Plan 9(3/4):333–350
Hermans L (2010) Actor analysis. In: Enserink B, Hermans L, Kwakkel J, Thissen W, Koppenjan J, Bots P (eds) Policy analysis of multi-actor systems. Boom Lemma Uitgevers, The Hague, pp 79–108
Hodson M, Marvin S (2010) Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? Res Policy 39:477–485
Hoffman J (2013) Theorizing power in transition studies: the role of creativity and novel practices in structural change. Policy Sci: 46(3): 1–19
Hölscher K, Wittmayer J (2017) A German experience: the challenges of adapting ‘ideal-type’ Transition Management in Ludwigsburg. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Hölscher K, Roorda C, Nevens F (2016) Ghent: fostering a climate for transition. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer JM, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 91–112
Hölscher K, Wittmayer J, Avelino F, Giezen M (2017) Opening up the transition arena: an analysis of (dis)empowerment of civil society actors in transition management in cities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Corrected Proof. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.004
Janssen MA, Hohman N (2012) Addressing global sustainability challenges from the bottom up: the role of information feedback. CSID Working Paper Series, #CSID-2012-011
Jhagroe S (2017) Urban transition management as democratic practice? The case of Rotterdam’s waterfront regeneration. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Jhagroe S, Loorbach D (2015) See no evil, hear no evil: the democratic potential of transition management. Environ Innov Soc Trans 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.001
Jhagroe S, van Steenbergen F (2014) Van koploper naar koplopen: een pleidooi voor inclusief leiderschap. Drift essay 2014.04. Online at: http://www.drift.eur.nl/?p1⁄4262
Kemp R, Rotmans J (2009) Transitioning policy: co-production of a new strategic framework for energy innovation policy in the Netherlands. Policy Sci 42(4):303–322
Kemp R, Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2007) Transition management as a model for managing processes of co-evolution towards sustainable development. Int J Sust Dev World 14(1):78–91
Khan J (2013) What role for network governance in urban low carbon transitions? J Clean Prod 50:133–139
Krauz A (2016) Transition management in Montreuil: towards perspectives of hybridisation between ‘top-down’ and ‘bottom-up’ transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 133–152
Loorbach D (2007) Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183
Loorbach D (2014) To transition! Governance panarchy in the new transformation, Inaugural lecture. Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Loorbach D, Rotmans J (2010) The practice of transition management: examples and lessons from four distinct cases. Futures 42:237–246
Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Huffenreuter L (2015) Transition management: taking stock from governance experimentation. J Corp Citizenship 58:48–66
McCormick K, Anderberg S, Coenen L, Neij L (2013) Advancing sustainable urban transformation. J Clean Prod 50:1–11
Meadowcroft J (2009) What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sci 42(4):323–340
Nevens F, Roorda C (2013) A climate of change: a transition approach for climate neutrality in the city of Ghent (Belgium). Sustain Cities Soc 10:112–121
Nevens F, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D, Gorissen L (2013) Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. J Clean Prod 50:111–122
Pestoff V (1992) Third sector and co-operative services – an alternative to privatization. J Consum Policy 15:21–45
Raven R, van den Bosch S, Weterings R (2010) Transitions and strategic niche management: towards a competence kit for practitioners. Int J Technol Manag 51(1):57–74
Rip A, Kemp R (1998) Technological change. In: Rayner S, Malone L (eds) Human choice and climate change, vol 2 resources and technology. Batelle Press, Washington, DC, pp 327–399
Roorda C, Wittmayer J (2014) Transition management in five European cities – an evaluation. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Roorda C, Wittmayer J, Henneman P, van Steenbergen F, Frantzeskaki N, Loorbach D (2014) Transition management in the urban context, Guidance manual. Drift, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Rotmans J (2005) Maatschappelijke innovatie tussen droom en werkelijkheid staat complexiteit. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam
Rotmans J, Loorbach D (2010) Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: a systemic and reflexive approach. In: Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (eds) Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. Routledge, New York/London, pp 105–220
Schuitmaker TJ (2012) Identifying and unravelling persistent problems. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 79:1021–1031
Seyfang G, Haxeltine A (2012) Growing grassroots innovations: exploring the role of community-based social movements in sustainable energy transitions. Environ Plann C 30(3):381–400
Seyfang G, Smith A (2007) Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: towards a new research and policy agenda. Environ Polit 16(4):584–603
Seyfang G, Haxeltine A, Hargreaves T, Longhurst N 2010 Energy and communities in transition – towards a new research agenda on agency and civil society in sustainability transitions. CSERGE Working Paper. https://www.econstor.eu/dspace/bitstream/10419/48803/1/636134792.pdf. Used: May 12th 2016
Shove E, Walker G (2007) CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management. Environ Plan A 39(4):763–770
Smith A (2012) Civil society in sustainable energy transitions. In: Verbong G, Loorbach D (eds) Governing the energy transition: reality, illusion, or necessity. Routledge, NewYork
Smith A, Kern F (2009) The transitions storyline in Dutch environmental policy. Environ Polit 18(1):78–98
Smith A, Stirling A (2010) The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable socio-technical transitions. Ecol Soc 15(1):11. DOI: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art11/
Smith A, Stirling A, Berkhout F (2005) The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Res Policy 34:1491–1510
Swyngedouw E (2005) Governance innovation and the citizen: the janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Stud 42(11):1991–2006
Thomas KW, Velthouse BA (1990) Cognitive elements of empowerment: an ‘Interpretative’ model of intrinsic task motivation. Acad Manag Rev 15(4):666–681
Turner RH (1990) Role change. Annu Rev Sociol 16:87–110
Van Buuren A, Loorbach D (2009) Policy innovation in isolation? Conditions for policy renewal by transition arenas and pilot projects. Public Manag Rev 11(3):375–392
Van den Bosch SJM (2010) Transition experiments: exploring societal changes towards sustainability. Erasmus University, Rotterdam. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/20714
Van Steenbergen F, Wittmayer J (2012) Carnisse in transitie? Een verkenning van het verleden, het heden en de toekomst van een Rotterdamse wijk. DRIFT-uitgave, Rotterdam. E 2012.05
Voß J-P, Smith A, Grin J (2009) Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management. Policy Sci 42(4):275–302
WBGU, German Advisory Council on Global Change (2011) World in transition – a social contract for sustainability, Berlin
Wittmayer JM (2016) Insights and lessons for the governance of urban sustainability transitions. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 157–173
Wittmayer JM, Loorbach D (2016) Governing transitions in cities: fostering alternative ideas, practices, and social relations through transition management. In: Loorbach D, Wittmayer J, Shiroyama H, Fujino J, Mizuguchi S (eds) Governance of urban sustainability transitions. European and Asian experiences. Springer, Tokyo/Heidelberg/New York/Dordrecht/London, pp 13–32
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N (2014) Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustain Sci 9(4):483–496
Wittmayer J, van Steenbergen F, Quist J, Loorbach D, Hoogland C (2011) In context. The community arena: a co-creation tool for sustainable behaviour by local communities. Methodological guidelines. http://incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/Methodological%20guidelines_final.pdf. Used: December 17th 2012
Wittmayer J, Frantzeskaki N, van Steenbergen F, Roorda C, Henneman P (2012) Introducing a profile for urban change agents: experiences from five European cities, Drift Working Paper, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Creative Commons
Wittmayer J, Mock M, van Steenbergen F, Baasch S, Omann I, Schäpke N (2013) Taking stock – three years of addressing societal challenges on community level through action research Pilot specific synthesis report. Deliverable 4.5. InContext: EU ENV.2010.4.2.3-1 grant agreement n° 265191. http://www.incontext-fp7.eu/sites/default/files/D4.5%20-%20Taking%20Stock-final_0.pdf. Used: 2 April 2015
Wittmayer J, Roorda C, van Steenbergen F (eds) (2014a) Governing urban sustainability transitions – inspiring examples. DRIFT, Rotterdam. 10.13140/RG.2.1.2367.7606
Wittmayer JM, Schäpke N, van Steenbergen F, Omann I (2014b) Making sense of sustainability transitions locally: how action research contributes to addressing societal challenges. Crit Policy Stud 8(4):465–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.957336
Wittmayer JM, van Steenbergen F, Rok A, Roorda C (2015) Governing sustainability: a dialogue between Local Agenda 21 and transition management. Local environment: the international journal of justice and sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1050658
Wittmayer JM, Avelino F, van Steenbergen F, Loorbach D (2017a) Actor roles in transition: insights from sociological perspectives. Environ Innov Sustain Transitions 24:45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003
Wittmayer JM, van Steenbergen F, Frantzeskaki N, Bach M (2017b) Transition management in urban context. In: Frantzeskaki N, Hölscher K, Bach M, Avelino F (eds) Co-creating sustainable urban futures. A primer on applying transition management in cities. Springer, Tokyo
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hölscher, K., Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M. (2018). Empowering Actors in Transition Management in and for Cities. In: Frantzeskaki, N., Hölscher, K., Bach, M., Avelino, F. (eds) Co-creating Sustainable Urban Futures. Future City, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69271-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69273-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)