Skip to main content

Optimum Wells Placement in Oil Fields Using Cellular Genetic Algorithms and Space Efficient Chromosomes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2016)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 751))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The present work introduces a new approach to the optimum wells placement problem in oil fields using evolutionary computation. In particular, our contribution is twofold: we propose an efficient algorithm for initialisation of highly constrained optimisation problems based on Monte-Carlo sampling and we propose a new optimisation technique that uses this population sampling scheme, a space-efficient chromosome and the application of cellular genetic algorithms to promote a large population diversity. Usually, authors define a domain representation having oil wells placed at any arbitrary position of the chromosome. On the other hand, the proposed representation enforces a unique relative wells position for each combination of wells. Therefore, the suggested scheme diminishes the problem size, thus making the optimisation more efficient. Moreover, by also employing a cellular genetic algorithm, we guarantee an improved population diversity along the algorithm execution. The experiments with the UNISIM-I reservoir indicate an enhancement of 6 to 10 times of the final NPV when comparing the proposed representation and the traditional one. Besides, the cellular genetic algorithm with the suggested chromosome performs better than the classical genetic algorithm by a factor of 1.5. The proposed models are valuable not only for the oil and gas industry but also to every integer optimisation problem that employs evolutionary algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yeten, B., Durlofsky, L.J., Aziz, K., et al.: Optimization of nonconventional well type, location and trajectory. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lima, R., Abreu, A.C., Pacheco, M.A., et al.: Optimization of reservoir development plan using the system octopus. In: OTC Brasil. Offshore Technology Conference (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emerick, A.A., Silva, E., Messer, B., Almeida, L.F., Szwarcman, D., Pacheco, M.A.C., Vellasco, M.M.B.R., et al.: Well placement optimization using a genetic algorithm with nonlinear constraints. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Morales, A.N., Gibbs, T.H., Nasrabadi, H., Zhu, D., et al.: Using genetic algorithm to optimize well placement in gas condensate reservoirs. In: SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bittencourt, A.C., Horne, R.N., et al.: Reservoir development and design optimization. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nasrabadi, H., Morales, A., Zhu, D., Well placement optimization: a survey with special focus on application for gas/gas-condensate reservoirs. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 5, 6–16 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jesmani, M., Bellout, M.C., Hanea, R., Foss, B.: Well placement optimization subject to realistic field development constraints. Comput. Geosci. 20(6), 1185–1209 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Siavashi, M., Tehrani, M.R., Nakhaee, A.: Efficient particle swarm optimization of well placement to enhance oil recovery using a novel streamline-based objective function. J. Energy Resour. Technol. 138(5), 052903 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Al Dossary, M.A., Nasrabadi, H.: Well placement optimization using imperialist competitive algorithm. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 147, 237–248 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bernabe Dorronsoro, E.A.: Cellular Genetic Algorithms. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Three-Phase, black-oil reservoir simulator, CMG (Computer Modeling Group Ltd.) (2015). https://www.cmgl.ca/uploads/files/pdf/SOFTWARE/2015ProductSheets/IMEX_Technical_Specs_15-IM-04.pdf

  12. Gaspar, A.T., Avansi, G.D., dos Santos, A.A., von Hohendorff Filho, J.C., Schiozer, D.J.: Unisim-id: Benchmark studies for oil field development and production strategy selection. Int. J. Model. Simul. Pet. Ind. 9(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Trangenstein, J.A., Bell, J.B.: Mathematical structure of the black-oil model for petroleum reservoir simulation. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 49(3), 749–783 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rankin, R., Riviere, B.: A high order method for solving the black-oil problem in porous media. Adv. Water Res. 78, 126–144 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kozlova, A., Li, Z., Natvig, J.R., Watanabe, S., Zhou, Y., Bratvedt, K., Lee, S.H., et al.: A real-field multiscale black-oil reservoir simulator. SPE J. (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thiele, M.R., Batycky, R.P., Blunt, M.J., et al.: A streamline-based 3d field-scale compositional reservoir simulator. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coats, K.H., et al.: An equation of state compositional model. Soc. Pet. Eng. J. 20(05), 363–376 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Qiao, C., Khorsandi, S., Johns, R.T., et al.: A general purpose reservoir simulation framework for multiphase multicomponent reactive fluids. In: SPE Reservoir Simulation Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Michalewicz, Z., Nazhiyath, G.: Genocop iii: a co-evolutionary algorithm for numerical optimization problems with nonlinear constraints. In: 1995, IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 2, pp. 647–651. IEEE (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Griffin, J.E., Walker, S.G.: On adaptive metropolis–hastings methods. Stat. Comput. 23(1), 123–134 (2013). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11222-011-9296-2

  21. Yildirim, I.: Bayesian inference: metropolis-hastings sampling. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Univ. of Rochester, Rochester, NY (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Eberly, D.: Robust computation of distance between line segments. Geometric Tools, LLC, Technical report (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gong, Y.-J., Chen, W.-N., Zhan, Z.-H., Zhang, J., Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, J.-J.: Distributed evolutionary algorithms and their models: a survey of the state-of-the-art. Appl. Soft Comput. 34, 286–300 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhao, Y., Chen, L., Xie, G., Zhao, J., Ding, J.: Gpu implementation of a cellular genetic algorithm for scheduling dependent tasks of physical system simulation programs. J. Comb. Optim. 1–25 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Avansi, G.D., Schiozer, D.J.: Unisim-i: Synthetic model for reservoir development and management applications. Int. J. Model. Simul. Pet. Ind. 9(1) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Ashade L. Cunha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cunha, A.A.L., Duncan, G., Bontempo, A., Pacheco, M.A.C. (2018). Optimum Wells Placement in Oil Fields Using Cellular Genetic Algorithms and Space Efficient Chromosomes. In: Bi, Y., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2016. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 751. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69266-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69266-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69265-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69266-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics