Skip to main content

Local, Mixed and Global Organic Tomato Supply Chains: Some Lessons Learned from a Real-World Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 927 Accesses

Part of the book series: Human-Environment Interactions ((HUEN,volume 7))

Abstract

This chapter presents the evaluation of three organic tomato supply chains in Catalonia (Spain): the Local and Global supply chains , and a Mixed supply chain . The evaluation is based on a set of multidimensional indicators derived from different narratives : Commodity, Environmental and Livelihoods. In so doing, we identified the main challenges when implementing the supply chain approach, and propose some recommendations for its application. The supply chain approach proves to be very useful in identifying the critical points at which to intervene and/or improve the performance of food supply chains , but presents some disadvantages when it is used to compare the sustainability of food supply chains. Finally, we show that organic production is not enough to achieve a sustainable food provision system, and the context and the food supply chain in which organic food is commercialised also determine the sustainability of organic food production .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    These food supply chains are referred to as local or short food supply chains, alternative food networks or localised food systems. We use the term “Local Food Supply Chain” to refer to them.

  2. 2.

    Based on the definitions presented in http://www.ifoam.bio/en/organic-landmarks/definition-organic-agriculture, and http://www.fao.org/organicag/oa-faq/oa-faq1/en/.

  3. 3.

    For more information, visit http://glamur.eu.

  4. 4.

    Data obtained from FAOSTAT web site.

  5. 5.

    Human activity was calculated using the labour costs reported in Moleres (2009). A workload of 45 h/week and a net salary of €1000/month were considered.

  6. 6.

    The farmers are members of a network of agroecological farmers. The network has developed a Participatory Warranty System (SPG) by means of a participatory process with producers and consumers. The SPG involves more than just production issues, and is guided by the aim of developing social transformation projects, promoting fair relations and small farmers’ autonomy.

  7. 7.

    A workload of 40 h/week and 48 weeks/year is assumed.

  8. 8.

    Fertigation refers to the injection of soil amendments, fertilizers and other water-soluble products into the irrigation system.

References

  • Allen, T. F. H., & Giampietro, M. (2006). Narratives and transdisciplines for a post-industrial world. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badal, M., Binimelis, R., Gamboa, G., Heras, M., Tendero, G. (2011). Arran de terra, indicadors participatius de Sobirania Alimentària a Catalunya. Resum de l’informe. Associació Entrepobles & Institut d’Economia Ecològica i Ecologia Política.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, M., & Burdick, B. (2005). Food (miles) for thought—Energy balance for locally-grown versus imported apple fruit. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 12(3), 125–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Capgemini Consulting. (2009). Estudio de la cadena de valor y formación de precios del tomate. Observatorio de precios de los alimentos, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Centre d’Estudis d’Opinió (CEO). (2015). Baròmetre 2015 de Percepció i Consum d’Aliments Ecològics. Generalitat de Catalunya. Available at: http://pae.gencat.cat/web/.content/al_alimentacio/al01_pae/05_publicacions_material_referencia/arxius/15_Barometre.pdf. Accessed on July 11, 2016.

  • Cobb, D., Dolman, P., & O’Riordan, T. (1999). Interpretations of sustainable agriculture in the UK. Progress in Human Geography, 23(2), 209–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, D., Howard, M., & Winter, M. (2009). Local food, food miles and carbon emissions: A comparison of farm shop and mass distribution approaches. Food Policy, 34, 150–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consell Català de Producció Agraria Ecològica (CCPAE). (2015). Recull d’estadístiques del sector ecològic a Catalunya 2000–2015. Available at: http://www.ccpae.org/docs/estadistiques/2015/00_2015_ccpae_recull-estadistiques.pdf. Accessed on January 15, 2016.

  • De Roest, K., & Menghi, A. (2000). Reconsidering “Traditional” food: The case of Parmigiano Reggiano Cheese. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament. (2016). On how the CAP can improve job creation in rural areas. (2015/2226(INI)). Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (1999). Agricultural biodiversity, multifunctional character of agriculture and land conference, background paper 1. Maastricht, Netherlands, September 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forssell, S., & Lankoski, L. (2015). The sustainability promise of alternative food networks: An examination through ‘‘alternative’’ characteristics. Agriculture and Human Values, 32, 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín, G. (1997). Indicators and their use: Information for decision-making. In B. Moldan & S. Billharz (Eds.), Sustainability indicators. Report of the project on Indicators of Sustainable Development. Scope 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamboa, G., Kovacic, Z., Di Masso, M., Mingorría, S., Gomiero, T., Rivera-Ferré, M., et al. (2016). The complexity of food systems: Defining relevant attributes and indicators for the evaluation of food supply chains in Spain. Sustainability, 8, 515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Generalitat de Catalunya (GENCAT). (2014). Superfícies i produccions dels conreus agrícoles any 2014. Available at: http://agricultura.gencat.cat/web/.content/de_departament/de02_estadistiques_observatoris/02_estructura_i_produccio/02_estadistiques_agricoles/01_llencols_definitius/fitxers_estatics/produccions_catalunya/Llencols_Catalunya_2014.pdf. Accessed on July 11, 2016.

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M. (2003). Multi-scale integrated analysis of agroecosystems. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giampietro, M., Mayumi, K., & Ramos-Martin, J. (2009). Multi-scale integrated analysis of societal and ecosystem metabolism (MuSIASEM): Theoretical concepts and basic rationale. Energy, 34, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The SAGE Encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. US: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero, T., Pimentel, D., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011). Environmental impact of different agricultural management practices: Conventional vs organic agriculture. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(1), 95–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzmán, G., García, A., Alonso, A., & Perea, J. (2008). Producción Ecológica: Influencia en el Desarrollo Rural. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino Secretaría General Técnica. Centro de Publicaciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, C. C. (2000). Embeddedness and local food systems: Notes on two types of direct agricultural market. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Food supply chains and sustainability: Evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders. Land Use Policy, 22, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarosz, L. (2008). The city in the country: Growing alternative food networks in Metropolitan areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 231–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. (2002). An environmental assessment of food supply chains: A case study on dessert apples. Environmental Management, 30(4), 560–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knickel, K., & Renting, H. (2000). Methodological and conceptual issues in the study of multifunctionality and rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 512–528. doi:10.1111/1467-9523.00164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magrini, T. (1995). Ballad and gender: reconsidering narrative singing in Northern Italy. Ethnomusicology Online. Available online: http://www.umbc.edu/eol/magrini/magrini.html. Accessed on January 15, 2016.

  • Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: Exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis, 40(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matopoulos, A., Barros, A. C., & van der Vorst, J. G. A. J. (2015). Resource-efficient supply chains: A research framework, literature review and research agenda. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 20(2), pp. 218–236. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SCM-03-2014-0090.

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA). (2012). Agricultura Ecológica. Estadísticas 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA). (2013). Agricultura Ecológica. Estadísticas 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA). (2014). Agricultura Ecológica. Estadísticas 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente (MAGRAMA). (2015). Agricultura Ecológica. Estadísticas 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moleres, J. (2009). Estudio y análisis de costes de producción de explotaciones de tomate ecológico bajo invernaderos en Almería. Final degree project, Technical School of Agricultural Engineers, Public University of Navarra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montero, J., Antón, M., Torrellas, M., Ruijs, M., & Vermeulen, P. (2011). Environmental and economic profile of present Greenhouse production systems in Europe. Deliverable 5, EUPHOROS project.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, K., & Murdoch, J. (2000). Organic vs. conventional agriculture: Knowledge, power and innovation in the food chain. Geoforum, 3(2), 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renting, H., Marsden, T. K., & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: Exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A, 35, 393–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyé, E., Oliver-Solà, J., Gasol, C. M., Farreny, R., Rieradevall, J., & Gabarrell, X. (2012). Life cycle assessment of energy flow and packaging use in food purchasing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 25, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyé-Mengual, E., Cerón-Palma, I., Oliver-Solà, J., Montero, J. I., & Rieradevall, J. (2013). Environmental analysis of the logistics of agricultural products from roof top greenhouses in Mediterranean urban areas. Journal of Science of Food and Agriculture, 93, 100–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2006). Beyond the divide: Rethinking relations between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal of Economic Geography, 6, 181–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiskerke, J. S. C. (2003). On promising niches and constraining socio-technical regimes: The case of Dutch wheat and bread. Environment and Planning, 35(3), 429–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gonzalo Gamboa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 10.4, 10.5 and 10.6.

Table 10.4 Characteristics of the Local organic tomato supply chain
Table 10.5 Characteristics of the mixed organic tomato supply chain
Table 10.6 Characteristics of the global organic tomato supply chain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gamboa, G., Mingorria, S., Di Masso, M., Giampietro, M. (2017). Local, Mixed and Global Organic Tomato Supply Chains: Some Lessons Learned from a Real-World Case Study. In: Fraňková, E., Haas, W., Singh, S. (eds) Socio-Metabolic Perspectives on the Sustainability of Local Food Systems. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69236-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics