Abstract
It should be evident that present authors have attempted to indicate the various applicability of the general QVA approach. A general consensus is that system’s monitored parameters may be aggregated such that the control variables, U and V of the cuspidal stability model for vulnerability analysis be obtained. In addition, one ought to submit that U and V are membership functions of a fuzzy theory set of impact indicators. In this chapter, the emphasis is placed on the installation of a nuclear reactor .
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Gheorghe, A. V., & Vamanu, D. V. (2005). Reading vulnerability in phase portraits: An exercise in probabilistic resilience assessment. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 1(4), 312–329. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCIS.2005.006678.
Warren, J. H. (2015). Safety culture monitoring: A management approach for assessing nuclear safety culture health performance utilizing multiple-criteria decision analysis (Ph.D.). Old Dominion University, USA, Virginia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gheorghe, A.V., Vamanu, D.V., Katina, P.F., Pulfer, R. (2018). Nuclear Reactors Vulnerability Assessment—A Generic Model. In: Critical Infrastructures, Key Resources, Key Assets. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 34. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69224-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69224-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69223-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69224-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)