Skip to main content

Allied Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Optimization with Interactive Fuzzy Programming Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Logistics and Transportation

Part of the book series: Springer Optimization and Its Applications ((SOIA,volume 129))

Abstract

The concept of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) has started to attract growing attention due to the consumer pressures, environmental awareness, and legislations. Managers in many companies have realized that a well-designed supply chain (SC) can improve the companies’ performance in the market. Thus, a lot of companies start to focus on CLSC issues including remanufacturing, refurbishing, recycling, and disposal of end-of-life products. The body of literature on CLSC management has been overwhelmingly dominated by noncooperative studies. In order to fill up this gap in the literature, we deal with an allied SC network in cooperative environment. With the implementation of allied SCs, companies not only maximize their profit but also minimize their various costs and become more flexible and efficient in the market. Following this motivation, we develop a decentralized multilevel CLSC model for allied SCs. At the first decision level, the plants in allied SCs are considered as the upper-level DMs of the Stackelberg game. At the second level, raw material suppliers, common suppliers, assembly centers, and common collection centers are considered as the lower-level DMs of the Stackelberg game. In order to tackle each decision-maker (DM)’s unique objectives, we propose a new fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based interactive fuzzy programming (IFP) approach. In the IFP approach, upper-level DMs determine the minimum satisfactory level for their own objectives, and by using this value, the lower DMs evaluate their own satisfactory level. A compromise solution can be derived until termination conditions are satisfied. The primary aim of this study is to design a decentralized CLSC network in cooperative environment and to propose a novel IFP approach. Finally, a numerical example is implemented and analyzed in order to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rice, J.B., Hoppe. R.M.: Supply chain vs. supply chain. Supply chain management review September/October (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Monczka, R.M., Petersen, K.J., Handfield, R.B., Ragatz, G.L.: Success factors in strategic supplier alliances: the buying company perspective. Decis Sci. 29(3), 553–577 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farahani, R.Z., Rezapour, S., Drezner, T., Fallah, S.: Competitive supply chain network design: an overview of classifications, models, solution techniques and applications. Omega. 45, 92–118 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rezapour, S., Farahani, R.Z., Fahimnia, B., Govindan, K., Mansouri, Y.: Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design with price-dependent demands. J Clean Prod. 93, 251–272 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rezapour, S., Zanjirani Farahani, R., Drezner, T.: Strategic design of competing supply chain networks for inelastic demand. J Oper Res Soc. 62(10), 1784–1795 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ondemir, O., Gupta, S.M.: A multi-criteria decision making model for advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order system. Eur J Oper Res. 233(2), 408–419 (2014)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Fuji Xerox, A.: Fuji xerox Australia sustainability report 2014. http://www.fxasustainability.com.au/2014/. Accessed 10 May 2016 (2014)

  8. IBM: Product recycling programs. Vol 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salema, M.I.G., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., Novais, A.Q.: An optimization model for the design of a capacitated multi-product reverse logistics network with uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res. 179(3), 1063–1077 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Vidovic, M., Dimitrijevic, B., Ratkovic, B., Simic, V.: A novel covering approach to positioning ELV collection points. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 57, 1–9 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zarandi, M.H.F., Sisakht, A.H., Davari, S.: Design of a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) model using an interactive fuzzy goal programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 56(5), 809–821 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gupta, A., Evans, G.W.: A goal programming model for the operation of closed-loop supply chains. Eng Optim. 41(8), 713–735 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Alrefaei, M., Govindan, K., Yong, G.: A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model. Resour Conserv Recycl. 67, 75–79 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kannan, G., Sasikumar, P., Devika, K.: A genetic algorithm approach for solving a closed loop supply chain model: a case of battery recycling. Appl Math Model. 34(3), 655–670 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Özceylan, E., Paksoy, T.: A mixed integer programming model for a closed-loop supply-chain network. Int J Prod Res. 51(3), 718–734 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pishvaee, M.S., Torabi, S.A.: A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161(20), 2668–2683 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaya, O.: Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations. Eur J Oper Res. 201(2), 442–453 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitra, S., Webster, S.: Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. Int J Prod Econ. 111(2), 287–298 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Subramanian, R., Ferguson, M.E., Beril Toktay, L.: Remanufacturing and the Component Commonality Decision. Prod Oper Manag. 22(1), 36–53 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, F., Nagi, R.: Multi-echelon supply chain network design in agile manufacturing. Omega. 41(6), 969–983 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Omri, A.E.: Cooperation in supply chains: alliance formation and profit allocation among independent firms. Ecole Centrale Paris, Paris (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sakawa, M., Nishizaki, I., Uemura, Y.: Interactive fuzzy programming for multilevel linear programming problems. Comp & Math Appls. 36(2), 71–86 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Sakawa, M., Nishizaki, I., Uemura, Y.: Interactive fuzzy programming for multi-level linear programming problems with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 109(1), 3–19 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Sakawa, M., Nishizaki, I.: Cooperative and noncooperative multi-level programming. Springer, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Govindan, K., Soleimani, H., Kannan, D.: Reverse logistics and closed-loop supply chain: a comprehensive review to explore the future. Eur J Oper Res. 240(3), 603–626 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., Davarzani, H.: Green supply chain management: a review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 162, 101–114 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pishvaee, M.S., Rabbani, M., Torabi, S.A.: A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model. 35(2), 637–649 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Pishvaee, M.S., Razmi, J.: Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming. Appl Math Model. 36(8), 3433–3446 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Jiménez, M., Arenas, M., Bilbao, A., Rodrı’guez, M.V.: Linear programming with fuzzy parameters: An interactive method resolution. Eur J Oper Res. 177(3), 1599–1609 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Fallah, H., Eskandari, H., Pishvaee, M.S.: Competitive closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Manufacturing Systems 37. Part. 3, 649–661 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Toksari, M.D., Bilim, Y.: Interactive Fuzzy Goal Programming Based on Jacobian Matrix to Solve Decentralized Bi-level Multi-objective Fractional Programming Problems. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 17(4), 499–508 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Subulan, K., Taşan, A.S., Baykasoğlu, A.: Designing an environmentally conscious tire closed-loop supply chain network with multiple recovery options using interactive fuzzy goal programming. Appl Math Model. 39(9), 2661–2702 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(1), 45–55 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Li, X.-q., Zhang, B., Li, H.: Computing efficient solutions to fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(10), 1328–1332 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Guua, S.-M., Y-K, W.: Two-phase approach for solving the fuzzy linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 107(2), 191–195 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahlatcioglu, M., Tiryaki, F.: Interactive fuzzy programming for decentralized two-level linear fractional programming (DTLLFP) problems. Omega. 35(4), 432–450 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Selim, H., Ozkarahan, I.: A supply chain distribution network design model: An interactive fuzzy goal programming-based solution approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 36(3), 401–418 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Torabi, S.A., Hassini, E.: An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(2), 193–214 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Özceylan, E., Paksoy, T.: Interactive fuzzy programming approaches to the strategic and tactical planning of a closed-loop supply chain under uncertainty. Int J Prod Res. 52(8), 2363–2387 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shimizu, K., Ishizuka, Y., Bard, J.F.: Nondifferentiable and Two-Level Mathematical Programming. Springer, Boston (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Chang, D.-Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res. 95(3), 649–655 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

In carrying out this study, the corresponding author (T. Paksoy) is granted by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) (International Postdoctoral Research Fellowship Program). This study is based on the Ph.D. thesis of the first author Ahmet Çalık at Selçuk University. These funds are hereby gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Turan Paksoy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Çalık, A., Pehlivan, N.Y., Paksoy, T., Karaoğlan, İ. (2017). Allied Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network Optimization with Interactive Fuzzy Programming Approach. In: Cinar, D., Gakis, K., Pardalos, P. (eds) Sustainable Logistics and Transportation. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 129. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69215-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics