Byzantine Posthumanism: Autopoiesis, Sympoiesis, and Making Kin in the Gardens of Romance

Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)


Through an analysis of the Byzantine Achilleid, this chapter demonstrates that, although the Byzantine romances are often defined by the violence and patriarchal control exemplified by the hero-hunter Achilles, the enclosed gardens wherein the heroines of romance reside nevertheless depict a posthuman world in which humans, animals, and anthropogenic landscapes thrive in peaceful co-existence. Ecocritical readings of the medieval Greek romance, therefore, can also critique current environmental practice, modeling how Byzantine studies can become a discipline more aware of how its discourses are used in contemporary political and cultural discourses both within and beyond the academy, and how the practice of ethical cultural and literary studies—of which ecocriticism is a part—can be relevant to both scholarly and political debates.


  1. Adams, Carol. 2010. The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist Vegetarian Critical Theory. Twentieth Anniversary Edition. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  2. Alaimo, Stacy. 2016. Exposed: Environmental Politics and Pleasures in Posthuman Times. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beaton, Roderick. 1996. Medieval Greek Romance. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Brett, Gerard. 1954. The Automata in the Byzantine ‘Throne of Solomon’. Speculum 29 (3): 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapui, Alfred, and Edmond Droz. 1958. Automata: A Historical and Technological Study. Trans. Alex Reid. New York: Central Book Company.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, Jeffrey Jerome. 2003. Medieval Identity Machines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  7. ———. 2006. Hybridity, Identity and Monstrosity in Medieval Britain: On Difficult Middles. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Constantinou, Stavroula. forthcoming. Between (Wo)men: Homosocial Desire in the War of Troy. In The Late Byzantine Romance: A Handbook, ed. Adam Goldwyn and Ingela Nilsson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dauterman Maguire, Eunice, and Henry Maguire. 2007. Other Icons: Art and Power in Byzantine Secular Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dempster, M. Beth. 1998. A Self-Organizing Systems Perspective on Planning for Sustainability. MA Thesis Submitted to University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, Ruth. 2010. Our Cyborg Past: Medieval Artificial Memory as Mindware Upgrade. Postmedieval 1 (1/2): 64–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frye, Northrop. 2006. The Secular Scripture and Other Writings on Critical Theory, 1976–1991, ed. Joseph Adamson and Jean Wilson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  13. Galbi, Douglas. n.d.-a. Achilles in Women’s Clothing: Tzetzes’s Allegorical Interpretations. Accessed April 21, 2017.
  14. ———. n.d.-b. Homer Effaced Palamedes to Heroize Word-Twisting Odysseus. Accessed April 21, 2017.
  15. Glimp, David. 2010. Moral Philosophy for Cyborgs. Postmedieval 1 (1/2): 72–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haraway, Donna. 1991. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature, 149–182. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. ———. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  18. ———. 2007. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  19. ———. 2015. Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin. Environmental Humanities 6: 159–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ———. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harris, Jonathan Gil. 2010. Mechanical Turks, Mammet Tricks and Messianic Time. Postmedieval 1 (1/2): 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hesseling, D.C. 1919. L’Achilléide Byzantine. Amsterdam: Johannes Müller.Google Scholar
  24. Iafrate, Allegra. 2016. The Wandering Throne of Solomon: Objects and Tales of Kingship in the Medieval Mediterranean. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Illimitable Men. n.d. The Red Pill Constitution. Accessed April 21, 2017.
  26. Jeffreys, Elizabeth. 1998. Digenis Akritis: The Grottaferrata and Escorial Versions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Le Guin, Ursula. 1996. The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. In The Ecocriticism Reader, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm. Athens: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lightsey, Scott. 2010. The Paradox of Transcendent Machines in the Demystification of the Boxley Christ. Postmedieval 1 (1/2): 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Littlewood, Anthony. 1979. Romantic Paradises: The Rôle of the Garden in the ByzantineRomance. Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 5: 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lomuto, Sierra. n.d. White Nationalism and the Ethics of Medieval Studies. Accessed April 21, 2017.
  31. Niewöhner, Philipp. 2016. Zoomorphic Rainwater Spouts. In Fountains and Water Culture in Byzantium, ed. Brooke Shilling and Paul Stephenson, 163–181. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nilsson, Terése. 2016. Ancient Water in Fictional Fountains: Waterworks in Byzantine Novels and Romances. In Fountains and Water Culture in Byzantium, ed. Brooke Shilling and Paul Stephenson, 281–298. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singer, Peter. 2002. Animal Liberation. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, Ole. 1999. The Byzantine Achilleid: The Naples Version, ed. Panagiotis Agapitos and Karin Hult. Vienna: Wiener Byzantinische Studien.Google Scholar
  35. Truitt, E.R. 2015. Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Veikou, Myrto. 2016. Space in Texts, Space as Text: A New Approach to Byzantine Literature. Scandinavian Journal of Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 2: 143–175.Google Scholar
  37. Wolfe, Cary. 2003. Animal Rites: American Culture, the Discourse of Species, and Posthumanist Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. ———. 2009. What Is Posthumanism? Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Zielinski, Siegfried, and Peter Weibel, eds. 2016. Allah’s Automata: Artifacts of the Arab-Islamic Renaissance (800–1200). Karlsruhe: Hatje Cantz.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Dakota State UniversityFargoUSA

Personalised recommendations