Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education pp 113–130Cite as

The Content-Language Tension for English Language Learners in Two Secondary Science Classrooms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Investigating the use of native languages (L1) in secondary science remains an unaddressed need in global scientific literacy. While past research in this area has largely focused on primary school students, more clarity is needed on the role of secondary school students’ L1 use in the classroom as the language of science becomes more specialized at a higher level. This chapter details two studies investigating L1 use in secondary science classrooms in New York and Singapore. The study employs qualitative and quantitative methods, including surveys, interviews, observation, and audio recording of student discourse. We find that the L1 can be used for learning scientific content, but is seen by some students as a hindrance to the acquisition of the majority language. This is seen when comparing in-class native language use and data from surveys and interviews. We propose that this reflects a content-language tension that exists in many linguistically diverse science classrooms. This tension highlights competing goals of content learning and acquisition of the majority language. We conclude with a discussion of implications for addressing scientific literacy on a global scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Another language” refers to students’ native languages or mother tongues. This was verbally clarified during survey administration.

References

  • Anstrom, K., DiCerbo, P., Butler, F., Katz, A., Millet, J., & Rivera, C. (2010). A review of the literature on academic English: Implications for K-12 English language learners. Arlington: The George Washington University Center for Equity and Excellence in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armour, M., Rivaux, S. L., & Bell, H. (2009). Using context to build rigor application to two hermeneutic phenomenological studies. Qualitative Social Work, 8(1), 101–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington: National Research Council, Institute of Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boeije, H. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. A., & Ryoo, K. (2008). Teaching science as a language: A “content-first” approach to science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(5), 529–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruna, K. R., Vann, R., & Escudero, M. P. (2007). What’s language got to do with it?: A case study of academic language instruction in a high school ‘English Learner Science’ class. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 36–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, F. A., Stevens, R., & Castellon, M. (2007). ELLs and standardized assessments: The interaction between language proficiency and performance on standardized tests. In A. L. Bailey (Eds.), The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test (pp. 27–49). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christian, D. (2001). Language policy issues in the education of immigrant students. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Proceedings of the Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 136–154). Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, V. P. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 617–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 103–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1979). Cognitive/academic language proficiency, linguistic interdependence, the optimum age question and some other matters. Working Papers on Bilingualism, 19, 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1980). The construct of language proficiency in bilingual education. Current issues in bilingual education, 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1981). Age on arrival and immigrant second language learning in Canada: A reassessment. Applied Linguistics, 2, 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echevarria, J., Short, D., & Powers, K. (2006). School reform and standards-based education: A model for English-language learners. The Journal of Educational, 95, 195–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging and Education. In Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism and Education (pp. 63–77). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F. (Eds.). (1999). Program alternatives for linguistically and culturally diverse students (Educational Practice Report No. 1). Santa Cruz: Center for Research on Education, Diversity & Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakuta, K., Butler, Y. G., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kearsey, J., & Turner, S. (1999). The value of bilingualism in pupils’ understanding of scientific language. International Journal of Science Education, 21(10), 1037–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J., Lesaux, N. K., Rivera, M., & Francis, D. J. (2009). Accommodations for English language learners taking large-scale assessments: A meta-analysis on effectiveness and validity. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1168–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75(4), 491–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2013). Integrating science and English proficiency for English language learners. Theory into Practice, 52(1), 3642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Penfield, R., & Buxton, C. (2011). Relationship between “form” and ‘content’ in science writing among English language learners. Teachers College Record, 113, 1401–1434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., Quinn, H., & Valdes, G. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for common core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, A. M. Y., & Wu, Y. (2014). “May I speak Cantonese?” – Co-constructing a scientific proof in an EFL junior secondary science classroom. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 18(3), 289–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maerten-Rivera, J., Myers, N., Lee, O., & Penfield, R. (2010). Student and school predictors of high-stakes assessment in science. Science Education, 94(6), 937–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Met, M. (1991). Learning language through content: Learning content through language. Foreign Language Annals, 24(4), 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moje, E. B., Collazo, T., Carrillo, R., & Marx, R. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(4), 469–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, F.M. (2007). Language in science education as a gatekeeper to learning, teaching, and professional development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 319–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, T., Suarez, C., Rosebery, A., O’Connor, M. C., Warren, B., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2012). “I never thought of it as freezing”: How students answer questions on large-scale science tests and what they know about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 778–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinhard, B. (1996). How does the medium of instruction affect the learning of chemistry?. School Science Review, 78(283), 73–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollnick, M. (2000). Current issues and perspectives on second language learning of science. Studies in Science Education, 35, 93–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 61–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-de-Velasco, J., & Fix, M. (2000). Overlooked and underserved: Immigrant students in US secondary schools. Washington: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarcella, R. (2003). Academic English: A conceptual framework (Technical Report No. 2003-1, No. 1). Santa Barbara: The University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. (2008). What is the vocabulary of science? In A. S. Rosebery, & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 71–83). Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996). Significance of limited English proficiency and cultural capital to the performance in science of Chinese-Australians. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(3), 265–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, H., & Zeidler, D (2002). The effects of English language proficiency and scientific reasoning skills on the acquisition of science content knowledge by Hispanic English language learners and native English language speaking students. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojnar, D. M., & Swanson, K. M. (2007). Phenomenology: An Exploration. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 25(3), 172–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong Fillmore, L., & Snow, C. (2000). What teachers need to know about language. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics, Science & Technology, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, USA

    Jason S. Wu & Felicia Moore Mensah

  2. School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    Kok-Sing Tang

Authors
  1. Jason S. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Felicia Moore Mensah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kok-Sing Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason S. Wu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Perth, Western Autralia, Australia

    Kok-Sing Tang

  2. Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden

    Kristina Danielsson

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wu, J., Mensah, F., Tang, KS. (2018). The Content-Language Tension for English Language Learners in Two Secondary Science Classrooms. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation