Abstract
There is considerable research on the role of language in science teaching and learning from contexts in which non-native speakers of English are taught science by teachers who are either native speakers of or proficient in English as the language of learning and teaching (LOLT). In many South African classrooms, students who are non-native speakers of English are taught in English, by teachers who are also non-native speakers. Furthermore, many students and teachers in these classrooms speak more than one local language, such that English is their third or subsequent language. Thus, most South African students are English additional language learners (EALs) as opposed to being English second language learners (ESLs). Many South African classrooms are therefore multilingual by nature. Yet, very little is known about the pedagogic demands of teaching science to EALs. Research on EALs experiences in science lessons in the South African context has potential not only to contribute to the broader literature on EAL teaching but also to inform teacher education on how to prepare teachers for these environments. Meta talk is one of the teaching strategies that may help facilitate EALs involvement in the lesson as well as promote deep engagement with content. The chapter discusses some vignettes from whole class discussions observed in a multilingual science classroom showing how one South African teacher uses meta talk to get his learners to engage with science concepts.
References
Braund, M., Lubben, F., Scholtz, Z., Sadeck, M., & Hodges, M. (2007). Comparing the effect of scientific and socio-scientific argumentation tasks: Lessons from South Africa. School Science Review, 88(324), 67–76.
Carnoy, M., Chilisa, B., & Chisholm, L. (2012). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC.
Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 1–3: English first additional language. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.
Department of Education. (1997). Language-in-education policy. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Department of Education. (2011). National curriculum statement grades R-12: Curriculum and assessment policy (CAPS) physical sciences. Pretoria: Department of Education.
Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Research in argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education 2015, 2, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1
Faerch, C. (1985). Meta talk in FL classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 184–199.
Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating academic language learning through classroom discourse. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 701–718). New York: Springer.
Howie, S., Scherman, V., & Venter, E. (2008). The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students in science achievement in South African secondary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 14(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610801896380
Janks, H. (2010). Language, power and pedagogies. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 40–61). Bristol: Multilingual matters.
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.
Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–117.
Mji, A., & Makgato, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners’ poor performance: A spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 253–266.
Moate, J. (2010). The integrated nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38–45.
Moate, J. (2011). Reconceptualising the role of talk in CLIL. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 5(2), 17–35.
Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Msimanga, A. (2013). Talking science in South Africa: Case studies of grade 10-12 science classrooms in Soweto. Johannesburg. University of the Witwatersrand.
Msimanga, A., & Lelliott, A. (2012). Making sense of science: Argumentation for meaning-making in a teacher-led whole class discussion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 192–206.
Probyn, M. (2006). Language and learning science in South Africa. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE2006), Pretoria.
Probyn, M. (2009). Smuggling the vernacular into the classroom’: Conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching in township/rural schools in South Africa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 123–136.
Rincke, K. (2011). It’s rather like learning a language: Development of talk and conceptual understanding in mechanics lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 229–258.
Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 199–236.
Scott, P., Mortimer, E. F., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36.
Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243–269.
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Webb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: Imperatives for the developed and developing world. Science, 328(5977), 448–450.
Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. Special issue: Natural science, cognitive science and pedagogical influences on science literacy: Empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Mr. McFar and his class. The funding for the research from which the data is drawn was provided by DIFID, the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Attendance at the ESERA conference where the first version of this chapter was presented came from an NRF KIC2015 grant to the first author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Msimanga, A., Erduran, S. (2018). Language, Literacy and Science Learning for English Language Learners: Teacher Meta Talk Vignettes from a South African Science Classroom. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)