Skip to main content

Language, Literacy and Science Learning for English Language Learners: Teacher Meta Talk Vignettes from a South African Science Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education

Abstract

There is considerable research on the role of language in science teaching and learning from contexts in which non-native speakers of English are taught science by teachers who are either native speakers of or proficient in English as the language of learning and teaching (LOLT). In many South African classrooms, students who are non-native speakers of English are taught in English, by teachers who are also non-native speakers. Furthermore, many students and teachers in these classrooms speak more than one local language, such that English is their third or subsequent language. Thus, most South African students are English additional language learners (EALs) as opposed to being English second language learners (ESLs). Many South African classrooms are therefore multilingual by nature. Yet, very little is known about the pedagogic demands of teaching science to EALs. Research on EALs experiences in science lessons in the South African context has potential not only to contribute to the broader literature on EAL teaching but also to inform teacher education on how to prepare teachers for these environments. Meta talk is one of the teaching strategies that may help facilitate EALs involvement in the lesson as well as promote deep engagement with content. The chapter discusses some vignettes from whole class discussions observed in a multilingual science classroom showing how one South African teacher uses meta talk to get his learners to engage with science concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Braund, M., Lubben, F., Scholtz, Z., Sadeck, M., & Hodges, M. (2007). Comparing the effect of scientific and socio-scientific argumentation tasks: Lessons from South Africa. School Science Review, 88(324), 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., Chilisa, B., & Chisholm, L. (2012). The low achievement trap: Comparing schooling in Botswana and South Africa. Pretoria: HSRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Basic Education. (2011). Curriculum and assessment policy statement grades 1–3: English first additional language. Pretoria: Department of Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (1997). Language-in-education policy. Pretoria: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2011). National curriculum statement grades R-12: Curriculum and assessment policy (CAPS) physical sciences. Pretoria: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2007). Research in argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erduran, S., Ozdem, Y., & Park, J. Y. (2015). Research trends on argumentation in science education: A journal content analysis from 1998-2014. International Journal of STEM Education 2015, 2, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faerch, C. (1985). Meta talk in FL classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7(2), 184–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating academic language learning through classroom discourse. In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 701–718). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Howie, S., Scherman, V., & Venter, E. (2008). The gap between advantaged and disadvantaged students in science achievement in South African secondary schools. Educational Research and Evaluation: An International Journal on Theory and Practice, 14(1), 29–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610801896380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janks, H. (2010). Language, power and pedagogies. In N. H. Hornberger & S. L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 40–61). Bristol: Multilingual matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organisation in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mji, A., & Makgato, M. (2006). Factors associated with high school learners’ poor performance: A spotlight on mathematics and physical science. South African Journal of Education, 26(2), 253–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moate, J. (2010). The integrated nature of CLIL: A sociocultural perspective. International CLIL Research Journal, 1(3), 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moate, J. (2011). Reconceptualising the role of talk in CLIL. Journal of Applied Language Studies, 5(2), 17–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Msimanga, A. (2013). Talking science in South Africa: Case studies of grade 10-12 science classrooms in Soweto. Johannesburg. University of the Witwatersrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Msimanga, A., & Lelliott, A. (2012). Making sense of science: Argumentation for meaning-making in a teacher-led whole class discussion. African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 192–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, M. (2006). Language and learning science in South Africa. Paper presented at the Annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (SAARMSTE2006), Pretoria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probyn, M. (2009). Smuggling the vernacular into the classroom’: Conflicts and tensions in classroom codeswitching in township/rural schools in South Africa. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12(2), 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rincke, K. (2011). It’s rather like learning a language: Development of talk and conceptual understanding in mechanics lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 229–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiffrin, D. (1980). Meta-talk: Organizational and evaluative brackets in discourse. Sociological Inquiry, 50(3–4), 199–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, P., Mortimer, E. F., & Ametller, J. (2011). Pedagogical link-making: A fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Studies in Science Education, 47(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between languages and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: Research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 235–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: Imperatives for the developed and developing world. Science, 328(5977), 448–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. Special issue: Natural science, cognitive science and pedagogical influences on science literacy: Empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Mr. McFar and his class. The funding for the research from which the data is drawn was provided by DIFID, the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg. Attendance at the ESERA conference where the first version of this chapter was presented came from an NRF KIC2015 grant to the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Audrey Msimanga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Msimanga, A., Erduran, S. (2018). Language, Literacy and Science Learning for English Language Learners: Teacher Meta Talk Vignettes from a South African Science Classroom. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics