Skip to main content

Learning Language and Intercultural Understanding in Science Classes in Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This study discusses a collaborative research and development project consisting of science teachers, German as a Second Language (GSL) teachers, and science educators. The project follows the model of Participatory Action Research in science education. It focuses on the development of teaching modules for early lower secondary school science lessons in grades 5–8 (age ranges roughly from 10 to 11 and 13 to 14, respectively) on different topics. The lesson modules implement the integration of content and language with the help of the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) approach. All lessons are structured using cooperative and autonomous learning methods. Over the last 2 years, the group has included intercultural understanding in its teaching materials. The accompanying research attempts to answer the following question: to what extent is it possible for students to learn science content, scientific terminology, and the German language simultaneously in an intercultural context, while working in cooperative learning settings and developing their intercultural understanding? Data were collected from classroom observations, student feedback questionnaires, cognitive tests, and teacher feedback. The initial results show that it is possible to successfully combine science content, language, and intercultural factors in the same lesson module. Students were highly motivated and the lesson modules showed great potential for improving students’ learning about the science subject matter. The lessons simultaneously contributed to improvements in the students’ German language skills and intercultural understanding. The findings reflect both the potential benefits and consequences of the language and intercultural understanding aspects selected for this lesson module. Conclusions from the results and further ideas are also addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Benholz, C., & Iordanidou, C. (2004). Fachtexte im Deutschunterricht der Sekundarstufe I. 5.- 8. Jahrgangsstufe. Deutschunterricht. Sonderheft: Das mehrsprachige Klassenzimmer, 4, 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburger, A. (2007). Fachunterricht ist Sprachförderung … Selbstständiger und kompetenter Umgang mit Lesetexten und Fachsprache. Pädagogik, 6, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bredella, L. (2003). For a flexible model of intercultural understanding. In G. Alred, M. Byram & M. Fleming (Eds.), Intercultural experience and education (pp. 31–49). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, L. A., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86, 821–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, H., & Ralle, B. (2012). Special language competences – diagnosis and individual support. In S. Markic, D. di Fuccia, I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Heterogeneity and cultural diversity in science education and science education research (pp. 11–22). Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, L. (2007). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science & Education, 92, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassels, J. R. T., & Johnstone, A. H. (1983). Meaning of the words and the teaching in chemistry. Education in Chemistry, 20, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childs, P. E., Markic, S., & Ryan, M. C. (2015). The role of language in teaching and learning of chemistry. In J. Garcia-Martinez & E. Serrano-Torregrosa (Eds.), Chemistry education: Best practice, innovative strategies and new technologies (pp. 421–446). Weinheim: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, V. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617–641. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilks, I., & Markic, S. (Eds.). (2014). Traditions and trends in German mathematics, science and technology education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(4), 229–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilks, I., & Ralle, B. (2002). Participatory action research in chemical education. In B. Ralle & I. Eilks (Eds.), Research in chemical education – what does this mean? (pp. 87–98). Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Z. (2006). The language demands of science reading in middle school. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 491–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, A., & Peat, F. (1988). The role of the language in science. Foundation of Physics, 18, 1233–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosser, M., & Glombard, B. (2008). The relationship between culture and the development of critical thinking abilities of prospective teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1364–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, A. H., & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2, 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1039/B0RP90028A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda. Review of Educational Research, 75, 491–530. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075004491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027004012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisen, J. (2004). Der bilinguale Sachfachunterricht aus verschiedenen Perspektiven – Deutsch als Arbeitssprache, als Lernsprache, als Unterrichtssprache und als Sachfachsprache im Deutschsprachigen Fachunterricht (DFU). Fremdsprache Deutsch, 30, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, U. (2005). Sprache und Sprechen in der Migration im Einwanderungsland Deutschland. In Instituts für Migrationsforschung und Interkulturelle Studien (IMIS) der Universität Osnabrück (Ed.), Sprache und Migration (pp. 89–134). Bad Iburg: Grote Druck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamlok-Naaman, R., Abels, S., & Markic, S. (2015). Learning about relevance concerning cultural and gender differences in chemistry education. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Relevant chemistry education – from theory to practice (pp. 219–240). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S. (2010). Umgang mit sprachlichen Defiziten von Schülerinnen und Schülern im Chemieunterricht. In D. Höttecke (Ed.), Entwicklung naturwissenschaftlichen Denkens zwischen Phänomen und Systematik (pp. 496–498). Münster: LIT-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S. (2011). Lesson plans for student language heterogeneity while learning about“matter and its properties”. In C. Bruguiere, A. Tiberghien & P. Clement (Eds.), Science learning and citizenship. Proceeding of the ESERA 2011 Conference. Part 3 (pp. 115–121). Lyon: European Science Education Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S. (2012). Lesson plans for students language heterogeneity while learning science. In S. Markic, D. di Fuccia, I. Eilks & B. Ralle (Eds.), Heterogeneity and cultural diversity in science education and science education research (pp. 41–52). Aachen: Shaker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S., & Abels, S. (2014). Heterogeneity and diversity – a growing challenge or enrichment for science education in German schools? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technological Education, 10(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1082a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S., & Abels, S. (2016). Science education meets inclusion. In S. Markic & S. Abels (Eds.), Science education towards inclusion (pp. 1–6). New York: Nova Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S., Broggy, J., & Childs, P. (2012). How to deal with linguistic issues in chemistry classes. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.), Teaching chemistry – a studybook (pp. 141–166). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2008). A case study on German first year chemistry student teachers’ beliefs about chemistry teaching and their comparison with student teachers from other science teaching domains. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8, 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1039/B801288C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19, 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto, S. (Ed.). (2000). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy: A ship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32(2), 203–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640220147559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the readers’ world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21, 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, H. H., & Roth, H.-J. (Eds.). (2002). Spracherwerb zweisprachig aufwachsender Kinder und Jugendlicher. Hamburg: Behörde für Bildung und Sport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riebling, L., & Bolte, C. (2008). Sprachliche Heterogenität im Chemieunterricht. In D. Höttecke (Ed.), Kompetenzen, Kompetenzmodelle, Kompetenzentwicklung. Gesellschaft für Didaktik der Chemie und Physik – Jahrestagung in Essen 2007 (pp. 176–178). Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrıguez, A., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing prospective mathematics and science teachers to teach for diversity: Promising strategies for transformative action. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W., & Tobin, K. (2009). Solidarity and conflict: Aligned and misaligned prosody as a transactional resource in intra – and intercultural communication involving power differences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 807–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-010-9272-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherz, Z., Spector-Levy, O., & Eylon, B. (2005). “Scientific communication”: An instructional program for high-order learning skills and its impact on students’ performance. In B. K. M. Goedhart, O. de-Jong & H. Eijkelhof (Eds.), Research and quality of science education (pp. 231–243). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sliwka, A. (2010). From homogeneity to diversity in German education. In OECD (Eds.), Effective teacher education for diversity: Strategies and challenges (pp. 205–217). Paris: OECD.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tajmel, T. (2010). DaZ-Förderung im naturwissenschaftlichen Fachunterricht. In B. Ahrenholz (Ed.), Fachunterricht und Deutsch als Zweitsprache (pp. 167–184). Tübingen: Narr Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Oord, L., & Corn, K. (2013). Learning how to “swallow the world”: Engaging with human differences in culturally diverse classrooms. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240913478085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. (2004). To educate the nations: Reflections on an international education. Woodbridge: John Catt.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvija Markic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Markic, S. (2018). Learning Language and Intercultural Understanding in Science Classes in Germany. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics