Abstract
This chapter presents results from a study aiming at investigating multimodal classroom interaction and its contribution to multilingual students’ meaning-making. The focus is on how science content is elaborated and negotiated through various semiotic resources. Data consist of video and audio recordings and digital photographs from a multilingual elementary school physics classroom during the unit “measuring time.” Theoretically, the project takes its stance in social semiotics and pragmatist theory. Data are analyzed through systemic functional linguistics, multimodal analyses, and Dewey’s principle of continuity. The results reveal that the teacher and the students were engaged in meaning-making activities involving a variety of semiotic resources with a potential to develop multilingual students’ scientific literacy. However, some observations indicate classroom practices that might constitute a hindrance for meaning-making. The study has implications for ways of promoting scientific literacy, including learning science, competent action, and communicating through different modes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Brown, B. A., & Spang, E. (2008). Double talk: Synthesizing everyday and science language in the classroom. Science Education, 92(4), 708–732.
Danielsson, K. (2016). Modes and meaning in the classroom. Linguistics and Education 35, 88–99.
Danielsson, K., & Selander, S. (2016). Reading multimodal texts for learning. A model for cultivating multimodal literacy. Designs for Learning, 8(1), 25–36.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience & education. New York: Touchstone.
Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas. A language-based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Gibbons, P. (2006). Bridging discourses in the ESL classroom. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Gibson, J. (1977). The theory of affordances. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1998/2004). Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In J. Webster (Ed.), The language of science (Collected works of M.A.K. Halliday) (Vol. 5, pp. 49–101). London: Continuum.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.
Jakobson, B., & Axelsson, M. (2012). ‘Beating about the bush’ on the how and why in elementary school science. Education Inquiry, 3, 495–511.
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2017). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.
Johansson, A-M., & Wickman, P. O. (2011). A pragmatist understanding of learning progression. In B. Hudson & A. M. Meinert (Eds.), Beyond fragmentation: Didactics, learning and teaching in Europe (pp. 47–59). Leverkusen Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality. A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. London: Routledge.
Kress, G., Jewitt, C., Ogborn, J., & Tsatsarelis, C. (2001). Multimodal teaching and learning: The rhetorics of the science classroom. London: Continuum.
Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin, & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice. Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. (1998). Multimedia literacy demands of the scientific curriculum. Linguistics and Education, 10(3), 247–271.
Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Literacy and learning across the curriculum: Towards a model of register for secondary school teachers. In R. Hasan, & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 232–278). Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman.
NTA. (2005). Mäta tid [Measuring time]. Stockholm: Kungl. Vetenskapsakademien, Kungl. Ingenjörsvetenskapsakademien.
Swedish Research Council. (2016). Humanistisk och samhällsvetenskaplig forskning. Retrieved from http://www.codex.vr.se/forskninghumsam.shtml
Wickman, P. O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Zhang, Y. (2016). Multimodal teacher input and science learning in a middle school sheltered classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 7–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jakobson, B., Danielsson, K., Axelsson, M., Uddling, J. (2018). Measuring Time. Multilingual Elementary School Students’ Meaning-Making in Physics. In: Tang, KS., Danielsson, K. (eds) Global Developments in Literacy Research for Science Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69197-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69196-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69197-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)