Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of the Four Well-Known Classification Algorithms in Data Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Information Technology, Services and Systems (AIT2S 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 25))

Abstract

Data mining is about extracting useful knowledge from data. It has various techniques and algorithms. Yet, the most widely used are classification algorithms which deal with the problem of affecting new data element to one of predefined classes. There are a wide range of classification algorithms such as decision trees, neural networks, K-NN, Bayes, support vector machines (SVM); and so on. This study focuses on four algorithms; Naive Bayes, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), SVM and C4.5; all of them are based on mathematical calculations but in different ways. In this paper, we aim to make a comparison between the four algorithms in terms of well-chosen criteria like classification accuracy and execution time. Moreover, we implement these algorithms with the same dataset; relative to diabetes on women; in order to present the different results by using Waikato environment for knowledge analysis (Weka).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. How Diabetes Affects Women: Symptoms, Risks, and More. http://www.healthline.com/health/diabetes/symptoms-in-women

  2. Dogan, N., Tanrikulu, Z.: A comparative analysis of classification algorithms in data mining for accuracy, speed and robustness. Inf. Technol. Manag. 14, 105–124 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lim, T.-S., Loh, W.-Y., Shih, Y.-S.: A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. Mach. Learn. 40, 203–228 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Rashid, T.A., Abdulla, S.M., Abdulla, R.M.: Decision support system for diabetes mellitus through machine learning techniques. Database 7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gupta, A., Mohammad, A., Syed, A., Halgamuge, M.N.: A comparative study of classification algorithms using data mining: crime and accidents in Denver City the USA. Education 7 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. UCI Machine Learning Repository: Pima Indians Diabetes Data Set. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Pima+Indians+Diabetes

  7. Weka 3 - Data Mining with Open Source Machine Learning Software in Java. http://www.cs.waikato.ac.nz/ml/weka/

  8. KNIME | Open for Innovation. https://www.knime.org/

  9. Orange – Data Mining Fruitful & Fun. https://orange.biolab.si/

  10. Data Science Platform | Machine Learning. https://rapidminer.com/

  11. Wahbeh, A.H., Al-Radaideh, Q.A., Al-Kabi, M.N., Al-Shawakfa, E.M.: A comparison study between data mining tools over some classification methods. IJACSA. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 8, 18–26 (2011). Spec. Issue Artif. Intell.

    Google Scholar 

  12. John, G., Langley, P.: Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salzberg, S.L.: C4. 5: Programs for machine learning by j. ross quinlan. morgan kaufmann publishers, inc., 1993. Mach. Learn. 16, 235–240 (1994)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Boser, B.E., Guyon, I.M., Vapnik, V.N.: A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 144–152. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rumelhart, G., Hinton, G., Williams, R.: Learning internal representations by error propagation. Presented at the (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xindong, W., Vipin, K.: The Top Ten Algorithms in Data Mining. Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series. CRC Press, New York (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Stefanowski, J.: Data Mining - Evaluation of Classifiers (2008). http://www.cs.put.poznan.pl/jstefanowski/sed/DM-4-evaluatingclassifiersnew.pdf

  18. Kirkby, R., Frank, E., Reutemann, P.: Weka Explorer User Guide for Version 3-5-8. Univ. Waikato, Hamilton (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Safae Sossi Alaoui .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sossi Alaoui, S., Farhaoui, Y., Aksasse, B. (2018). A Comparative Study of the Four Well-Known Classification Algorithms in Data Mining. In: Ezziyyani, M., Bahaj, M., Khoukhi, F. (eds) Advanced Information Technology, Services and Systems. AIT2S 2017. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69137-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69137-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69136-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69137-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics