Abstract
This paper describes an agent-based, incentive-driven, and privacy-preserving information sharing framework. Main contribution of the paper is to give the data provider agent an active role in the information sharing process and to change the currently asymmetric position between the provider and the requester of data and information (DI) to the favor of the DI provider. Instead of a binary yes/no answer to the requester’s data request and the incentive offer, the provider may negotiate about excluding from the requested DI bundle certain pieces of DI with high privacy value, and/or ask for a different type of incentive. We show the presented approach on a use case. However, the proposed architecture is domain independent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
From now on we use DI to refer to “data and information” but also interchangeably use only “data” or only “information” as well.
- 2.
Note the distinction between DI and DI types where the former refers to the data itself while the latter is about the type of data, where ‘age’ is a DI type and ‘68’ is a corresponding piece of DI.
References
Acquisti, A., Grossklags, J.: Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Secur. Priv. 3(1), 26–33 (2005)
Baarslag, T., Alan, A.T., Gomer, R., Alam, M., Perera, C., Gerding, E.H., et al.: An automated negotiation agent for permission management. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on AAMAS, pp. 380–390 (2017)
Baarslag, T., Gerding, E.H., Aydoğan, R., Schraefel, M.: Optimal negotiation decision functions in time-sensitive domains. In: Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), vol. 2, pp. 190–197. IEEE (2015)
Barnes, S.: A privacy paradox: social networking in the united states. First Monday 11(1) (2006)
Barth, S., de Jong, M.D.: The privacy paradox investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online behavior a systematic literature review. Telematics and Informatics (2017, in press)
Becker, M.C., Knudsen, T.: The role of routines in reducing pervasive uncertainty. J. Bus. Res. 58(6), 746–757 (2005)
Culnan, M.J., Armstrong, P.K.: Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organ. Sci. 10(1), 104–115 (1999)
Dinev, T., Hart, P.: An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf. Syst. Res. 17(1), 61–80 (2006)
El-Khatib, K.: A privacy negotiation protocol for web services. In: Workshop on Collaboration Agents: Autonomous Agents for Collaborative Environments, pp. 85–92. Halifax (2003)
Faratin, P., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Using similarity criteria to make issue trade-offs in automated negotiations. Artif. Intell. 142(2), 205–237 (2002)
Fatima, S., Kraus, S., Wooldridge, M.: Principles of Automated Negotiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2014)
Jonker, C.M., Aydoğan, R., Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Ito, T., Hindriks, K.: Automated negotiating agents competition. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-17), pp. 5070–5072. AAAI Press (2017)
Jonker, C.M., Robu, V., Treur, J.: An agent architecture for multi-attribute negotiation using incomplete preference information. Auton. Agent. Multi-Agent Syst. 15(2), 221–252 (2007)
Kafalı, Ö., Günay, A., Yolum, P.: Protoss: A run time tool for detecting privacy violations in online social networks. In: ASONAM, pp. 429–433 (2012)
Kawaguchi, S., Fujita, K., Ito, T.: AgentK: compromising strategy based on estimated maximum utility for automated negotiating agents. In: Ito, T., Zhang, M., Robu, V., Fatima, S., Matsuo, T. (eds.) New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations. SCI, vol. 383, pp. 137–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24696-8_8
Kokciyan, N., Yolum, P.: PRIGUARD : a semantic approach to detect privacy violations in online social networks. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 28(10), 2724–2737 (2016)
Krasnova, H., Veltri, N.F., Günther, O.: Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: the role of culture. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 4(3), 127–135 (2012)
Li, H., Sarathy, R., Xu, H.: The role of affect and cognition on online consumers’ decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decis. Support Syst. 51(3), 434–445 (2011)
Lin, R., Kraus, S., Baarslag, T., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K., Jonker, C.M.: Genius: an integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators. Comput. Intell. 30(1), 48–70 (2014)
Culnan, M.J., Bies, R.J.: Consumer privacy: balancing economic and justice considerations. J. Soc. Issues 59(2), 323–342 (2003)
Preibusch, S.: Implementing privacy negotiation techniques in e-commerce. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on E-Commerce Technology, CEC 2005, pp. 387–390. IEEE (2005)
Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)
Taddei, S., Contena, B.: Privacy, trust and control: which relationships with online self-disclosure? Comput. Hum. Behav. 29(3), 821–826 (2012)
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Murat Sensoy and Pinar Yolum for our fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the ITEA M2MGrids Project, ITEA141011.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aydoğan, R., Øzturk, P., Razeghi, Y. (2017). Negotiation for Incentive Driven Privacy-Preserving Information Sharing. In: An, B., Bazzan, A., Leite, J., Villata, S., van der Torre, L. (eds) PRIMA 2017: Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems. PRIMA 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69131-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69131-2_31
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69130-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69131-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)