Advertisement

Conclusion

Overcoming Social Inequality Through Shadow Education?
Chapter
  • 631 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the main findings of the book by addressing the central question underlying all prior analyses: Is there a possibility that shadow education is used as an instrument to neutralize a student’s disadvantaged family background and thus serves as an explanation for high educational outcomes but low socioeconomic impact on these outcomes among Japanese students? Or does a high dependence on shadow education as found in Japan inevitably contribute to the reproduction or increase of educational and social inequalities? By bringing together the specific findings of the different chapters of the book, the following overall finding is presented: Shadow education in Japan enables students to neutralize their disadvantaged family background – if certain conditions are met. Based on this assessment, the conceptual implications stemming from the Shadow-Education-Inequality-Impact (SEII) Frame as introduced in Chap.  1 of this book and its specific outliers for the field of international shadow education are presented. Hence, researchers are encouraged to make use of the introduced SEII Frame for future research on shadow education in different settings, while treating the Japanese model of shadow education as exemplary role model for such research. Finally, some recommendations for politicians and researchers alike are made.

Keywords

Shadow education Juku Private tutoring Supplementary education Social inequality Education reform, Yutori education Educational competition Credentialist society Schooled society SEII Frame HHSS 1997 HHSS 2011 JSTS 2013 Japan 

References

  1. Amano, I., & Poole, G. S. (2005). The Japanese university in crisis. Higher Education, 50(4), 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnove, R. F., & Torres, C. A. (Eds.). (2007). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Toronto/Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling, and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good. Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center (CERC).Google Scholar
  6. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dierkes, J. (2009). Privatschulen und privatwirtschaftliche Zusatzschulen in Japan: Bildungspolitische Lückenbüßer und Marktlücke. [Private schools and private-sector supplementary schools: Education political stopgap and gap in the market]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55(5), 732–746.Google Scholar
  8. Entrich, S. R. (2014). Effects of investments in out-of-school education in Germany and Japan. Contemporary Japan, 26(1), 71–102.Google Scholar
  9. Entrich, S. R., & Lauterbach, W. (2017). Shadow education as an instrument of social closure? Contradicting findings from the German LifE study. Comparative Education Review, submitted.Google Scholar
  10. Kariya, T., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (1999). Bright flight – Unintended consequences of detracking policy in Japan. American Journal of Education, 107, 210–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuroishi, N., & Takahashi, M. (2009). Gakkō kyōiku to juku sangyō no renkei ni tsuite no ichikenkyū: Genjō no bunseki to kongo no tenbō [A study on collaborations between the cram-school industry and public education: From present circumstances to future proposals]. Kyōiku Sōgō Kenkyū, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. LeTendre, G. K. (1994). Distribution tables and private tests: The failure of middle school reform in Japan. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 126–136.Google Scholar
  13. Mori, I. (2013). Supplementary education in the United States: Policy, context, characteristics, and challenges. In J. Aurini, S. Davies, & J. Dierkes (Eds.), Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (pp. 191–207). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sadler, S. M. (1900). Study of Foreign Systems of Education. Reprint with small deletions by George Z. F. Bereday (1964). Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314.Google Scholar
  15. Schlösser, H.-J., & Schuhen, M. (2011). Führt Nachhilfe zu Wettbewerbsverzerrungen? [Does private tutoring result in distortions of competition?]. Empirische Pädagogik, 25(3), 370–379.Google Scholar
  16. Seiyama, K. (1981). Gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no kōka ni kansuru ichikōsatsu. [A Study of the Effects of Out-of-school Educational Investment]. Hokudai Bungakubu Kiyō, 30(1), 171–221.Google Scholar
  17. Watanabe, M. (2013). Juku: The stealth force of education and the deterioration of schools in Japan. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  18. Yamato, Y., & Zhang, W. (2017). Changing schooling, changing shadow: Shapes and functions of juku in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(3), 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Education, Social Science Educational ResearchUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations