Advertisement

Change of Shadow Education

Diversity in Supply: How Shadow Education Remains Strong
Chapter
  • 653 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the Change dimension outlined in the Shadow-Education-Inequality-Impact (SEII) Frame, specifically addressing the question how Japanese shadow education managed to maintain strong despite unfavorable changes which were believed to make this industry superfluous until 2009 and how this affects educational opportunities for disadvantaged educational strata. Since the implications of a high dependence on shadow education for a national system of education regarding educational opportunities and social inequality issues are hardly overestimated, following a neo-institutionalist approach, the ongoing success of the juku-industry is explored. Applying a mixed-method approach basing my calculations on data of the 2013 Juku Student and Teacher Survey (JSTS), the following main findings are presented:
  1. (1)

    Due to decreasing student populations, the reformation of the mainstream schooling system, and changed educational demands of families, the originally highly specialized juku have expanded their range of supply. Juku increasingly take on functions outside their original purview such as care, counseling, and guidance and thus achieve many of the yutori education goals that regular schools struggle to accomplish.

     
  2. (2)

    Due to continuous changes, new types of juku have evolved particularly focusing on individual tutoring.

     
  3. (3)

    This industry shows continuous efforts to increase opportunities for socioeconomically disadvantaged students to participate in various types of lessons in the shadow and thus gain benefits from juku-lessons also.

     
  4. (4)

    Families increasingly rely on juku as their primary contact in educational matters, wherefore these schools gain further importance as educational gap-closer and authority in educational and social matters.

     

Keywords

Shadow education Juku Private tutoring Supplementary education Social inequality Educational opportunities Yutori education Education policy Demographic change Educational demands Educational change Educational reform New institutionalism SEII Frame Benesse Gakkōgaikyōikukatsudō ni kansuru Chōsa 2013 JSTS 2013 Japan 

References

  1. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amano, I. (1998). Postwar Japanese education: A history of reform and counterreform. In E. R. Beauchamp (Ed.), Education and schooling in Japan since 1945 (pp. 152–167). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Arnove, R. F., & Torres, C. A. [Hrsg.] (2007). Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local. Lanham/Boulder/New York/Toronto/Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  4. Aspinall, R. (2010). Education reform in Japan in an era of internationalization and risk. Hikone: Center for Risk Research, Shiga University.Google Scholar
  5. Azuma, H. (2002). The development of the course of study and the structure of educational reform in Japan. In G. DeCoker (Ed.), National standards and school reform in Japan and the United States (pp. 5–19). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities. World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bjork, C., & Tsuneyoshi, R. (2005). Education reform in Japan: Competing visions for the future. The Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 619–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  10. Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  11. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center (CERC) and Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  12. Breakspear, S. (2012). The policy impact of PISA: An exploration of the normative effects of international benchmarking in school system performance (OECD Education Working Papers, 71).Google Scholar
  13. Cave, P. (2001). Educational reform in Japan in the 1990s: ‘Individuality’ and other uncertainties. Comparative Education, 37(2), 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cave, P. (2004). “Bukatsudō”: The educational role of Japanese school clubs. Journal of Japanese Studies, 30(2), 383–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dierkes, J. (2009). Privatschulen und privatwirtschaftliche Zusatzschulen in Japan: Bildungspolitische Lückenbüßer und Marktlücke [Private schools and private-sector supplementary schools: Education political stopgap and gap in the market]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55(5), 732–746.Google Scholar
  17. Dierkes, J. (2010). Teaching in the shadow: Operators of small shadow education institutions in Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dierkes, J. (2012, March 2). Exam forces students to cram irrelevant facts. Asahi Shimbun. http://info.japantimes.co.jp/print/eo20120203a1.html
  19. Dierkes, J. (2013). The insecurity industry: Supplementary education in Japan. In: J. Aurini, S. Davies and J. Dierkes (Eds.), Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (International perspectives on education and society, Vol. 22, pp. 3–21). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Drinck, B. (2006). Leistung und Lernen im “überhitzten“ Bildungssystem Japans [Performance and learning in the ‘overheated’ Japanese education system]. Bildung und Erziehung, 59(3), 337–352.Google Scholar
  21. Entrich, S. R. (2014). Effects of investments in out-of-school education in Germany and Japan. Contemporary Japan, 26(1), 71–102.Google Scholar
  22. Entrich, S. R. (2016). Der Bedarf nach Mehr: Erklärungen für die Persistenz der Juku-Industrie [The need for more: Explanations of the persistence of the Juku-industry]. Bildung und Erziehung, 69(2), 155–174.Google Scholar
  23. Fujita, H. (2000). Shimin shakai to kyōiku [The civil society and education]. Kyoto: Seori Shobo.Google Scholar
  24. Fujita, H. (2010). Whither Japanese schooling? Educational reforms and their impact on ability formation and educational opportunity. In J. A. Gordon, H. Fujita, T. Kariya, & G. K. LeTendre (Eds.), Challenges to Japanese education. Economics, reform, and human rights (pp. 17–53). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fukaya, M. (1977). Shingakujuku to sono kinō: shūdan mensetsu chōsa o tegakari to shite [The Shingakujuku and its functions: Clues from a group interview study]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 32, 51–64.Google Scholar
  26. Goodman, R. (2003). The why, what and how of educational reform in Japan. In R. Goodman & D. Phillips (Eds.), Can the Japanese change their education system? Oxford studies in comparative education (pp. 7–30). Oxford: Symposium Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gürtler, L., & Huber, G. L. (2012). Triangulation. Vergleiche und Schlussfolgerungen auf der Ebene der Datenanalyse [Triangulation. Comparisons and conclusions at the data analysis level]. In M. Gläser-Zikuda, T. Seidel, C. Rohlfs, A. Gröschner, & S. Ziegelbauer (Eds.), Mixed Methods in der empirischen Bildungsforschung [Mixed methods in empirical educational research] (pp. 37–50). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  28. Iwase, R. (2005). Shingaku juku ni okeru gakushū keiken no kōzō [The organization of learning experiences in a Shingaku Juku]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 44, 1111–1118.Google Scholar
  29. Iwase, R. (2006). Shingaku juku ni okeru kodomo no kōi yōtai: Kodomo ni yoru chōsei ronri no keisei to sono sayō [The acting of children in Shingaku Juku: The formation of an arbitration logic by children and its effect]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōiku Kenkyū-ka Nenpō, 8, 69–78.Google Scholar
  30. Iwase, R. (2007). Gendai nihon ni okeru juku no tenkai: Juku o meguru shakai-teki imi no hensen katei [The development of Juku in modern Japan: The transformation of the social importance of Juku]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 46, 121–130.Google Scholar
  31. Iwase, R. (2008). Sōgō juku ni okeru jugyō katei no tokushitsu-teki yōtai to shakai-teki imi: Senku-teki jirei ni miru sōgō-ka to chūgaku juken to no kankei no kōsatsu [The social importance of Sōgō Juku and their specific teaching process aspects: Considering the relationship between middle school entrance exam and the pioneering case of synthetization]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 48, 81–91.Google Scholar
  32. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods – Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, R. S. (2011). Education reform in Japan (OECD Economics Department Working Papers 888).Google Scholar
  34. Kariya, T. (2010). Views from the Japanese side. Challenges to Japanese education. In J. A. Gordon, H. Fujita, T. Kariya, & G. K. LeTendre (Eds.), Challenges to Japanese education. Economics, reform, and human rights (pp. 11–13). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  35. Kariya, T. (2013). Understanding structural changes in inequality in education. Paper presented at the DIJ-Workshop “Social Inequality in Japan: A Reassessment” DIJ Tokyo.Google Scholar
  36. Kataoka, E. (2015). Gakkōgaikyōiku-hi shishutsu to kodomo no gakuryoku [Expenses for out-of-school education and academic achievement of students]. Komazawadaigaku Bungakubu Kenkyū Kiyō, 73, 259–273.Google Scholar
  37. Kinmoth, E. H. (2005). From selection to seduction: The impact of demographic change on private higher education in Japan. In J. S. Eades, R. Goodman, & Y. Hada (Eds.), The ‘Big Bang’ in Japanese higher education. The 2004 reforms and the dynamics of change (pp. 106–135). Melbourne: Trans Pacific Press.Google Scholar
  38. Komiyama, H. (1993). Gakurekishakai to juku – datsu juken kyōsō no susume [Credentialist society and Juku –stop the entrance examination competition!]. Tokyo: Shinhyōron.Google Scholar
  39. Komiyama, H. (2000). Juku: Gakkō surimuka jidai wo maeni [Juku: before the era of downsizing schools]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  40. Kondō, M., Nogaki, Y., Harada, A., & Takahata, M. (1963). Shingaku junbi kyōiku no kenkyū. Gakushūjuku – kateikyōshinado ni kansuru chōsa hōkoku [A study of out-of-school education preparing for entrance examinations. Report of the Gakushū Juku and private tutoring survey]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 18, 239–355.Google Scholar
  41. LeTendre, G. K. (1996). Constructed aspirations: Decision-making processes in Japanese educational selection. Sociology of Education, 69(3), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maurer, A., & Schmid, M. (2002). Die ökonomische Herausforderung der Soziologie? [The economic challenge of sociology?]. In: A. Maurer, & M. Schmid (Eds.), Neuer Institutionalismus: Zur soziologischen Erklärung von Organisation, Moral und Vertrauen [New institutionalism: Concerning a sociological explanation of organization, morale and confidence] (pp. 9–38). Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  43. Mawer, K. (2015). Casting new light on shadow education – Snapshots of Juku variety. Contemporary Japan, 27(2), 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. METI, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. (2010). “Gakushūjuku kōshi ginō kentei shiken” no setsuritsu ni muketa – Gakushūjuku kōshi nōryoku hyōka shisutemu kōdo-ka jigyō [Towards the establishment of an “Exam concerning the Ability of Juku Teachers” – The industry for the further development of the Juku teachers’ ability evaluation system]. Retrieved from www.meti.go.jp/policy/servicepolicy/contents/management_support/H21%20gakusyujyuku%20report.pdf
  45. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2005). FY2005 white paper on education, culture, sports, science and technology – Educational reform and enhancement of the educational functions of communities and families. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/hakusho/html/06101913.htm
  46. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2014). English education reform plan corresponding to globalization. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/english/topics/1343591.htm
  47. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2017). Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.mext.go.jp/english/statistics/
  48. Mimizuka, H. (2007). Shōgakkō gakuryoku kakusa ni idomu: Dare ga gakuryoku o kakutoku suru no ka [Determinants of children’s academic achievements in primary education]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 80, 23–39.Google Scholar
  49. Mizushima, Y. (2007). Shingaku juku fuyō-ron [A theory concerning the unnecessity of Shingaku Juku]. Tokyo: Discover.Google Scholar
  50. Mori, I., & Baker, D. P. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education – What the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nishimura, N. (2009). Naze uchi no ko dake gōkaku suru no ka? Chūgaku juken ‘kashikoi juku no tsukaikata’ [Why do only our children pass the test? The smart way to use Juku for middle school entrance]. Tokyo: Eijipress.Google Scholar
  52. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for Japan. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264118539-en
  53. Okada, A. (2012). Education policy and equal opportunity in Japan. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  54. Ono, S., & Ueno, K. (2001). Gakuryoku ga abunai [Educational achievement is in danger]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  55. Ota, T. (2014). Shingaku juku to iu sentaku [A choice called Shingaku Juku]. Tokyo: Nihon Keizai Shimbun Shuppan.Google Scholar
  56. Park, H. (2013). Re-evaluating education in Japan and Korea. Demystifying stereotypes. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  57. Roesgaard, M. H. (2006). Japanese education and the cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the Juku. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rohlen, T. P. (1980). The Juku phenomenon: An exploratory essay. Journal of Japanese Studies, 6(2), 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Russell, N. U. (1997). Lessons from Japanese cram schools. In W. K. Cummings & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of eastern Asian education: Implications for America (pp. 153–170). New York: State University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sadler, S. M. (1900). Study of foreign systems of education. Reprint with small deletions by George Z. F. Bereday (1964). Comparative Education Review, 7(3), 307–314.Google Scholar
  61. Sato, M. (1999). Kyōiku kaikaku o dezain suru [Designing educational reform]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  62. Schubert, V. (1992). Die Inszenierung der Harmonie. Erziehung und Gesellschaft in Japan [The staging of harmony. Education and society in Japan]. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.Google Scholar
  63. Schubert, V. (1999). Lernkultur – Das Beispiel Japan [Learning culture – the example of Japan]. Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  64. Schubert, V. (2005). Pädagogik als vergleichende Kulturwissenschaft – Erziehung und Bildung in Japan [Pedagogy as comparative cultural study – education in Japan]. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  65. Schubert, V. (2006). Individualisierung und Konformität — Kontrastierende Modelle in Japan und Deutschland? [Individualisation and conformity — Contrasting models in Japan and Germany?]. In T. Schwinn (Ed.), Die Vielfalt und Einheit der Moderne [The diversity and unity of modernity] (pp. 185–197). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  66. Schümer, G. (1999). Mathematikunterricht in Japan: Ein Überblick über den Unterricht in öffentlichen Grund- und Mittelschulen und privaten Ergänzungsschulen [Mathematics education in Japan: An overview of instruction in public elementary and secondary schools and private supplementary schools]. In V. Schubert (Ed.), Lernkultur – Das Beispiel Japan [Learning culture – The example of Japan] (pp. 45–76). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  67. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teacher’s for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  69. Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. American Educator, 15(1), 12–20.Google Scholar
  70. Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tanabe, Y. (2004). What the 2003 MEXT action plan proposes to teachers of English. The Language Teacher, 28(3), 3–8.Google Scholar
  72. Tsukada, M. (1988). Institutionalised supplementary education in Japan: The Yobiko and Ronin student adaptations. Comparative Education, 24(3), 285–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tsukada, M. (1991). Yobiko life: A study of the legitimation process of social stratification in Japan. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  74. Watanabe, M. (2013). Juku: The stealth force of education and the deterioration of schools in Japan. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  75. Yuki, M., Sato, A., & Hashisako, K. (1987). Gakushū juku – Kodomo, oya, kyōshi wa dō miteiru ka [Academic Juku – How do children, parents, and teachers view them?]. Tokyo: Gyōsei.Google Scholar
  76. Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate, competitive examinations and their consequences. London/New York: Cassell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Education, Social Science Educational ResearchUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations