Advertisement

Access to Shadow Education

A Rational Choice? Who Decides to Invest in Shadow Education?
Chapter
  • 658 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the Access dimension outlined in the Shadow-Education-Inequality-Impact (SEII) Frame, specifically addressing the question who is involved in the decision for shadow education and how that might affect the perceived formation of social inequality. In Japan, families need to decide whether or not an investment in shadow education is necessary to increase the chances of successfully entering a chosen high school or university. Based on sociological Rational Choice Theory, thus far, socioeconomic background and parents’ educational aspirations, in conjunction with students’ academic achievement, have been deemed influential to such decisions in Japan. The agency of the student is rarely even considered. Basing my calculations on data of the 2011 Hyōgo High School Students (HHSS) survey, the following main findings are presented:
  1. (1)

    students’ influence on decision-making concerning shadow education increases with higher age;

     
  2. (2)

    in high school, students’ own ideas concerning their future life course determine the decision for shadow education even against their parents’ wishes;

     
  3. (3)

    considerable differences in the effects of social origin and educational aspirations on the decision for a certain type of shadow education are found; and

     
  4. (4)

    low social strata prefer correspondence courses, whereas high social strata prefer juku-lessons. The theoretical approach presented in this chapter stresses the importance of acknowledging the existence of a multitude of actors involved in each phase of the decision-making process, including the students themselves, especially when explaining inequalities in modern societies.

     

Keywords

Shadow education Juku Private tutoring Supplementary education Social inequality Educational opportunities Educational decision-making Educational aspirations Rational Choice Theory Shadow Education Investment Theory SEII Frame HHSS 2011 Japan 

References

  1. Amano, I., & Poole, G. S. (2005). The Japanese University in Crisis. Higher Education, 50(4), 685–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bjork, C., & Tsuneyoshi, R. (2005). Education reform in Japan: Competing visions for the future. The Phi Delta Kappan, 86(8), 619–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital [Economic capital, cultural capital, social capital]. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten [Social inequalities] (pp. 185–199). Otto Schwartz Verlag: Göttingen.Google Scholar
  5. Breen, R., van de Werfhorst, H., & Jæger, M. M. (2014). Deciding under doubt: A theory of risk aversion, time discounting preferences, and educational decision-making. European Sociological Review, 30(2), 258–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cave, P. (2016). Schooling selves. Autonomy, interdependence, and reform in Japanese junior high education. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cook, M. (2013). Expatriate parents and supplementary education in Japan: Survival strategy or acculturation strategy. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Entrich, S. R. (2014). German and Japanese education in the shadow – Do out-of-school lessons really contribute to class reproduction? IAFOR Journal of Education, 2(2), 17–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Entrich, S. R. (2015). The decision for shadow education in Japan: Students’ choice or parents’ pressure? Social Science Japan Journal, 18(2), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1996). Explaining class inequality in education – The Swedish test case. In R. Erikson & J. O. Jonsson (Eds.), Can education be equalized? The Swedish case in comparative perspective (pp. 1–63). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  11. Fujihara, S. (2011). Breen ando Goldthorpe no aitaiteki risuku kaihi kasetsu no kenshō: Chichioya no kodomo ni taisuru shokugyō kyōiku kitai o mochiita keiryō bunseki [Empirical test of Breen and Goldthorpe’s relative risk aversion hypothesis in the Japanese society: Data analysis of a father’s occupational and educational expectations for his child]. Shakaigaku Hyōron, 62(1), 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gambetta, D. (1987). Were they pushed or did they jump? Individual decision mechanisms in education. London/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hamajima, K., & Takeuchi, K. (2002). Kodomo no shingaku asupirēshon no kitei yōin ni kansuru kenkyū: Toshi shōchūgakusei no 15 nenkan no henyō [A study concerning the determinants of children’s aspirations regarding the transition to a higher school level: The transformation of urban primary and middle school students over 15 years]. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Japan Society of Educational Sociology, Hiroshima.Google Scholar
  14. Hurrelmann, K. (2010). Lebensphase Jugend – Eine Einführung in die sozialwissenschaftliche Jugendforschung [Stage of life: Youth – An introduction to sociological research on youth]. Juventa: Weinheim.Google Scholar
  15. Jones, R. S. (2011). Education reform in Japan (OECD Economics Department Working Papers 888).Google Scholar
  16. Jonsson, J. O., & Erikson, R. (2000). Understanding educational inequality: The Swedish experience. L’Année Sociologique, 50, 345–382.Google Scholar
  17. Kariya, T. (2013). Education reform and social capital in Japan: The changing incentive divide. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Kariya, T. (2017). Understanding structural changes in inequality in Japanese education. In D. Chiavacci & C. Hommerich (Eds.), Social inequality in post-growth Japan. Transformation during economic and demographic stagnation (pp. 149–165). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Kataoka, E. (2001). Kyōiku tassei katei ni okeru kazoku no kyōiku senryaku: Bunka shihon kōka to gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi kōka no jendāsa o chūshin ni [Family strategy in educational attainment process in Japan: Effects of cultural capital and investment in extra-school education]. Kyōikugaku Kenkyū, 68(3), 259–273.Google Scholar
  20. Kikkawa, T. (2006). Gakureki to Kakusa-Fubyōdō: Seijukusuru Nihongata Gakureki Shakai [Education and social inequality: Contemporary educational credentialism in Japan]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
  21. Konakayama, A., & Matsui, T. (2008). Gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no gakuryoku ni oyobosu eikyō ni kansuru ikkōsatsu [An empirical study on how extra school education affects academic achievement of Japanese high school students]. Tōkaidaigaku Seiji Keizaigakubu Kiyō, 40, 131–158.Google Scholar
  22. Lange, A., & Xyländer, M. (2010). Bildungswelt Familie: Disziplinäre Perspektiven, theoretische Rahmungen und Desiderate der empirischen Forschung [Education in the family: Disciplinary perspectives, theoretical framing and sesiderata of empirical research]. In A. Lange & M. Xyländer (Eds.), Bildungswelt Familie – Theoretische Rahmung, empirische Befunde und disziplinäre Perspektiven [Education in the family – theoretical framing, empirical findings and disciplinary perspectives] (pp. 23–94). Juventa: Weinheim.Google Scholar
  23. Lauterbach, W. (2013). Is it always the family of origin? The influence of parental and teenage aspirations on status attainment in young adulthood. Paper presented at the 2nd international conference on transitions in youth and young adulthood, University of Basel.Google Scholar
  24. LeTendre, G. K. (1994). Distribution tables and private tests: The failure of middle school reform in Japan. International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 126–136.Google Scholar
  25. LeTendre, G. K. (1996). Constructed aspirations: Decision-making processes in Japanese educational selection. Sociology of Education, 69(3), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matsuoka, R. (2015). School socioeconomic compositional effect on shadow education participation: Evidence from Japan. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2008). Kodomo no gakkōgai de no gakushū seikatsu ni kansuru jittai chōsa hōkoku [National report concerning the out-of-school learning activities of children]. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/20/08/08080710.htm
  28. Mimizuka, H. (2009). Shinro sentaku no kōzō to hen’yō [Structure and transformation of course selection]. In T. Onai (Ed.), Kyōiku no fubyōdō [Educational inequality] (pp. 224–239). Nihontosho: Tokyo..Google Scholar
  29. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
  30. Ono, H. (2005). Does examination hell pay off? A cost-benefit analysis of “Ronin” and college education in Japan (SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 346).Google Scholar
  31. Roesgaard, M. H. (2006). Japanese education and the Cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the Juku. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  32. Rohlen, T. P. (1980). The Juku Phenomenon: An exploratory essay. Journal of Japanese Studies, 6(2), 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schultz Lee, K. (2010). Parental educational investments and aspirations in Japan. Journal of Family Issues, 31(12), 1579–1603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seiyama, K., & Noguchi, Y. (1984). Kōkō shingaku ni okeru gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no kōka [The effects of outside of school educational investments at the transition to high school]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 39, 113–126.Google Scholar
  35. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Takeuchi, Y. (1997). The self-activating entrance examination system – its hidden agenda and its correspondence with the Japanese “Salary Man”. Higher Education, 34(2), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tobishima, S. (2012). Kōkōsei no gakushū jikan ni taisuru sōki gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no eikyō [Impact of early outside of school education on learning time of high school students]. Nenpō Shakaigaku Ronshū, 25, 144–155.Google Scholar
  39. Tomura, A., Nishimaru, R., & Oda, T. (2011). Kyōiku tōshi no kitei yōin to kōka: Gakkōgai kyōiku to shiritsu chūgaku shingaku o chūshin ni [Determinants and effects of investments in education: Focusing on out-of-school education and the transition to private middle schools]. In Y. Satō & F. Ojima (Eds.), Gendai no kaisō shakai: Kakusa to tayōsei [Modern class society: Disparity and diversity] (pp. 267–280). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tsuneyoshi, R. (2013). Junior high school entrance examinations in metropolitan Tokyo: The advantages and costs of privilege. In G. DeCoker & C. Bjork (Eds.), Japanese education in an era of globalization: Culture, politics, and equity (pp. 164–182). New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  41. Watanabe, M. (2013). Juku: The stealth force of education and the deterioration of schools in Japan. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Education, Social Science Educational ResearchUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations