Advertisement

Introduction

Shadow Education and Social Inequality in Japan
Chapter
  • 686 Downloads

Abstract

Research on shadow education frequently stressed that a participation in shadow education is highly restricted by socioeconomic background, consequently fostering educational and social inequalities. Based on a literature review and a discussion of international and Japanese research findings on the subject, this chapter outlines the general problematic underlying the book and its contents and structure. In doing so, a formalized conceptual frame suited to analyze the possible negative and positive implications of shadow education on inequality is developed, called the Shadow–Education–Inequality–Impact (SEII) Frame. This frame draws on the four main dimensions that affect the implications of shadow education for social and educational inequalities: Access, Effects, Continuity, and Change. Since there exists a general lack of empirical verification of assumptions such as that shadow education inevitably contributes to social reproduction, two main proposals are brought forth: First, researchers shall be encouraged to make use of the introduced SEII Frame for future research on shadow education in different settings, particularly to identify possible evolving patterns in the field. Second, the Japanese model of shadow education shall be treated as an exemplary role model for such research.

Keywords

Shadow education Juku Private tutoring Supplementary education Extended education Social inequality Educational opportunities Educational competition Education policy Schooled society SEII Frame PISA 2012 HHSS 1997 HHSS 2011 JSTS 2013 Japan 

References

  1. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aurini, J., Davies, S., & Dierkes, J. (Hrsg.). (2013). Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education. International perspectives on education and society. Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, D. P. (2014). The schooled society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, D. P., & LeTendre, G. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities. World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling, and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, R., & Lauterbach, W. (Hrsg.). (2016). Bildung als Privileg – Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.Google Scholar
  7. BERD, Benesse Education Research and Development Center. (2009). Gakkō-gai kyōiku katsudō ni kansuru chōsa 2009 hon hōkoku-sho [Report on the Survey concerning Out-of-School Educational Activities 2009]. Retrieved from: http://berd.benesse.jp/berd/center/open/report/kyoikuhi/webreport/index.html
  8. Bills, D. B. (2016). Congested credentials: The material and positional economies of schooling. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(1), 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray, M. (1999). The shadow education system: Private tutoring and its implications for planners. Paris: UNESCO/International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  10. Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare, 36(4), 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bray, M. (2009). Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).Google Scholar
  12. Bray, M. (2010). Researching shadow education: Methodological challenges and directions. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bray, M. (2011). The challenge of shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in the European Union. Retrieved from: http://www.nesse.fr/nesse/activities/reports
  14. Bray, M. (2017). Schooling and its supplements: Changing global patterns and implications for comparative education. Comparative Education Review, 61(3), 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014a). The global spread of shadow education: Supporting or undermining qualities of education? In D. B. Napier (Ed.), Qualities of education in a globalised world (pp. 185–200). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014b). Measurement issues in research on shadow education: Challenges and pitfalls encountered in TIMSS and PISA. Comparative Education Review, 58(4), 590–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2013). Behind the façade of fee-free education: Shadow education and its implications for social justice. Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 480–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good. Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center (CERC).Google Scholar
  19. Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education: Private tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Comparative Education Research Center (CERC) and Asian Development Bank: Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  20. Bray, M., Mazawi, A. E., & Sultana, R. G. (Hrsg.). (2013). Private tutoring across the Mediterranean: Power dynamics and implications for learning and equity. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Bray, M., Kwo, O., & Jokic B. (Hrsg.). (2015). Researching private supplementary tutoring: Methodological lessons from diverse cultures. Hong Kong: Springer/Comparative Education Research Center.Google Scholar
  22. Breen, R., Luijkx, R., Müller, W., & Pollak, R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: Evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5), 1475–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Buchmann, C., Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Byun, S.-y., & Hyunjoon, P. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American Youth: The role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 40–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chiavacci, D., & Hommerich, C. (2017a). After the banquet. New inequalities and their perception in Japan since the 1990s. In D. Chiavacci & C. Hommerich (Eds.), Social inequality in post-growth Japan. Transformation during economic and demographic stagnation (pp. 3–26). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Chiavacci, D., & Hommerich, C. (Hrsg.). (2017b). Social inequality in post-growth Japan. Transformation during economic and demographic stagnation. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Craig, J. E. (1981). The expansion of education. Review of Research in Education, 9, 151–213.Google Scholar
  28. Dang, H.-A., & Rogers, F. H. (2008). The growing phenomenon of private tutoring: Does it deepen human capital, widen inequalities, or waste resources? World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 161–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Davies, S. (2004). School choice by default? Understanding the demand for private tutoring in Canada. American Journal of Education, 110(3), 233–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dawson, W. (2010). Private tutoring and mass schooling in East Asia: Reflections of inequality in Japan, South Korea and Cambodia. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dierkes, J. (2008a). Japanese shadow education: The consequences of school choice. In M. Forsey, S. Davies, & G. Walford (Eds.), The globalisation of school choice? (pp. 231–248). Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  32. Dierkes, J. (2008b). Single-sex education in the Japanese supplementary education industry. Paper presented at the Comparative and International Education Society Annual Conference, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Dierkes, J. (2008c). Supplementary education: Global growth, Japan’s experience, Canada’s future. Education Canada, 48(4), 54–58.Google Scholar
  34. Dierkes, J. (2009). Privatschulen und privatwirtschaftliche Zusatzschulen in Japan: Bildungspolitische Lückenbüßer und Marktlücke [Private schools and private-sector supplementary schools: Education political stopgap and gap in the market]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 55(5), 732–746.Google Scholar
  35. Dierkes, J. (2010). Teaching in the shadow: Operators of small shadow education institutions in Japan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dierkes, J. (2013). The insecurity industry: Supplementary education in Japan. In J. Aurini, S. Davies, & J. Dierkes (Eds.), Out of the shadows: The global intensification of supplementary education (International perspectives on education and society, Vol. 22, pp. 3–21). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Entrich, S. R. (2014a). Effects of investments in out-of-school education in Germany and Japan. Contemporary Japan, 26(1), 71–102.Google Scholar
  38. Entrich, S. R. (2014b). German and Japanese education in the shadow – Do out-of-school lessons really contribute to class reproduction? IAFOR Journal of Education, 2(2), 17–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fiala, R., & Lanford, A. G. (1987). Educational ideology and the World Educational Revolution, 1950–1970. Comparative Education Review, 31(3), 315–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fujihara, S., & Ishida, H. (2016). The absolute and relative values of education and the inequality of educational opportunity: Trends in access to education in postwar Japan. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(1), 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Fujita, H. (2010). Whither Japanese schooling? Educational reforms and their impact on ability formation and educational opportunity. In J. A. Gordon, H. Fujita, T. Kariya, & G. K. LeTendre (Eds.), Challenges to Japanese Education. Economics, Reform, and Human Rights (pp. 17–53). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  42. Hayasaka, M. (2013). Juku no jishu kisei to shitsu hoshō: Shadanhōjin zenkoku gakushū juku kyōkai no setsuritsu katei to torikumi o tegakari to shite [The Self-regulation and Quality Assurance of the Juku: Referring to the Establishment Process of “The Japan Juku Association” and its Performance]. Gakkō Kyōikugaku Kenkyū Ronshū, 27, 11–23.Google Scholar
  43. Heyneman, S. P. (2011). Private tutoring and social cohesion. Peabody Journal of Education, 86, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hille, A., Katharina Spieß, C., & Staneva, M. (2016). Immer mehr Schülerinnen und Schüler nehmen Nachhilfe [More and more students receive private tutoring]. DIW-Wochenbericht, 2016(6), 111–121.Google Scholar
  45. Ireson, J., & Rushforth, K. (2011). Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: Its nature, extent and purpose. Research Papers in Education, 26(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Iwase, R. (2005). Shingaku juku ni okeru gakushū keiken no kōzō [The organization of learning experiences in a Shingaku Juku]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 44, 1111–1118.Google Scholar
  47. Iwase, R. (2006). Shingaku juku ni okeru kodomo no kōi yōtai: Kodomo ni yoru chōsei ronri no keisei to sono sayō [The acting of children in Shingaku Juku: The formation of an arbitration logic by children and its effect]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōiku Kenkyū-ka Nenpō, 8, 69–78.Google Scholar
  48. Iwase, R. (2007). Gendai nihon ni okeru juku no tenkai: Juku o meguru shakai-teki imi no hensen katei [The development of Juku in modern Japan: The transformation of the social importance of Juku]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 46, 121–130.Google Scholar
  49. Iwase, R. (2008). Sōgō juku ni okeru jugyō katei no tokushitsu-teki yōtai to shakai-teki imi: Senku-teki jirei ni miru sōgō-ka to chūgaku juken to no kankei no kōsatsu [The social importance of Sōgō Juku and their specific teaching process aspects: Considering the relationship between middle school entrance exam and the pioneering case of synthetization]. Tōkyōdaigaku Daigakuin Kyōikugakukenkyūka Kiyō, 48, 81–91.Google Scholar
  50. Jones, R. S. (2011). Education reform in Japan (OECD Economics Department Working Papers 888).Google Scholar
  51. Kandel, I. L. (1933). Studies in comparative education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  52. Kariya, T. (2017). Understanding structural changes in inequality in Japanese education. In D. Chiavacci & C. Hommerich (Eds.), Social Inequality in post-growth Japan. Transformation during economic and demographic stagnation (pp. 149–165). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Kataoka, E. (2001). Kyōiku tassei katei ni okeru kazoku no kyōiku senryaku: Bunka shihon kōka to gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi kōka no jendāsa o chūshin ni [Family strategy in educational attainment process in Japan: Effects of cultural capital and investment in extra-school education]. Kyōikugaku Kenkyū, 68(3), 259–273.Google Scholar
  54. Kataoka, E. (2015). Gakkōgaikyōiku-hi shishutsu to kodomo no gakuryoku [Expenses for out-of-school education and academic achievement of students]. Komazawadaigaku Bungakubu Kenkyū Kiyō, 73, 259–273.Google Scholar
  55. Kikkawa, T. (2006). Gakureki to Kakusa-Fubyōdō: Seijukusuru Nihongata Gakureki Shakai [Education and social inequality: Contemporary educational Credentialism in Japan]. Tokyo: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
  56. Kim, S., & Lee, J.-H. (2010). Private tutoring and demand for education in South Korea. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 58(2), 259–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kita, K. (2006). Gakkōgai kyōiku riyō ni tsuite no nenrei, jendā-betsu no tokusei to kaisōteki yōin [Age, gender specifics and class determinants of out-of-school education utilization]. Kyōiku Jissen Kenkyū, 14, 1–7.Google Scholar
  58. Komiyama, H. (1993). Gakurekishakai to juku – datsu juken kyōsō no susume.[Credentialist society and Juku –stop the entrance examination competition!]. Tokyo: Shinhyōron.Google Scholar
  59. Komiyama, H. (2000). Juku: Gakkō surimuka jidai wo maeni [Juku: Before the Era of Downsizing schools]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  60. Konakayama, A., & Matsui, T. (2008). Gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no gakuryoku ni oyobosu eikyō ni kansuru ikkōsatsu [An empirical study on how extra school education affects academic achievement of Japanese high school students]. Tōkaidaigaku Seiji Keizaigakubu Kiyō, 40, 131–158.Google Scholar
  61. Kuroishi, N., & Takahashi, M. (2009). Gakkō kyōiku to juku sangyō no renkei ni tsuite no ichikenkyū: Genjō no bunseki to kongo no tenbō [A study on collaborations between the Cram-school industry and public education: From present circumstances to future proposals]. Kyōiku Sōgō Kenkyū, 2, 1–14.Google Scholar
  62. Lee, S., & Shouse, R. C. (2011). Impact of prestige orientation on shadow education in South Korea. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. LeTendre, G. K. (1996). Constructed aspirations: Decision-making processes in Japanese educational selection. Sociology of Education, 69(3), 193–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Liu, J., & Bray, M. (2016). Determinants of demand for private supplementary tutoring in China: Findings from a national survey. Education Economics, 2016, 1–14.Google Scholar
  65. MacPherson, I., Robertson, S., & Geoffrey, W. (2014). Education, privatisation and social justice – Case studies from Africa, South Asia and South East Asia. Oxford: Symposium Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Matsuoka, R. (2015). School socioeconomic compositional effect on shadow education participation: Evidence from Japan. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 270–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2008). Kodomo no gakkōgai de no gakushū seikatsu ni kansuru jittai chōsa hōkoku [National report concerning the out-of-school learning activities of children]. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/houdou/20/08/08080710.htm
  68. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. (2014). Kodomo no gakushūhi chōsa [Survey concerning children’s learning expenses]. Retrieved from: http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/toukei/chousa03/gakushuuhi/kekka/1268105.htm
  69. Meyer, J. W., Ramirez, F. O., Rubinson, R., & Boli-Bennett, J. (1977). The World Educational Revolution, 1950–1970. Sociology of Education, 50(4), 242–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Mimizuka, H. (2007). Shōgakkō gakuryoku kakusa ni idomu: Dare ga gakuryoku o kakutoku suru no ka [Determinants of children’s academic achievements in primary education]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 80, 23–39.Google Scholar
  71. Monbushō, Ministry of Education. (1977). Daijin kanbu chōsa tōkei-ka: Zenkoku gakushū juku toi no jittai [Ministerial Executive Research Statistics: Actual Situation of the National Juku Problem]. Tokyo: Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  72. Mori, I., & Baker, D. P. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education – What the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the Postmodern Institution of Education. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 11, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2012). Strong performers and successful reformers in education: Lessons from PISA for Japan. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264118539-en
  74. OECD, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201132-en
  75. Ojima, F., & Aramaki, S (Hrsg.). (2013). Gendai kōkōsei no shinro to seikatsu. Kyoto: Doshisha University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Okada, A. (2012). Education policy and equal opportunity in Japan. New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  77. Park, H., & Lee, Y.-J. (2013). Growing educational inequality in Japan during the 2000s. In G. DeCoker & C. Bjork (Eds.), Japanese education in an Era of globalization: Culture, politics, and equity (pp. 131–146). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Park, H., Byun, S.-y., & Kim, K.-k. (2011). Parental involvement and students’ cognitive outcomes in Korea: Focusing on private tutoring. Sociology of Education, 84, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Park, H., Buchmann, C., Choi, J., & Merry, J. J. (2016). Learning beyond the school walls: Trends and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 42, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Roesgaard, M. H. (2006). Japanese education and the Cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the Juku. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.Google Scholar
  81. Rohlen, T. P. (1980). The Juku Phenomenon: An exploratory essay. Journal of Japanese Studies, 6(2), 207–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Russell, N. U. (1997). Lessons from Japanese cram schools. In W. K. Cummings & P. G. Altbach (Eds.), The challenge of Eastern Asian education: Implications for America (pp. 153–170). New York: State University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Russell, N. U. (2002). The role of the private sector in determining national standards: How Juku undermine Japanese educational authority. In G. DeCoker (Ed.), National standards and school reform in Japan and the United States (pp. 158–176). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  84. Sato, T. (2000). Fubyōdō Shakai Nihon [Inequality Society Japan]. Chūō Koron Shinsha.Google Scholar
  85. Schneider, T. (2005). Nachhilfe als Strategie zur Verwirklichung von Bildungszielen. Eine empirische Untersuchung mit Daten des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels (SOEP) [Private tutoring as a strategy for achieving educational goals. An Empirical Study based on the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP)]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 51(3), 363–379.Google Scholar
  86. Schümer, Gundel (1999). Mathematikunterricht in Japan: Ein Überblick über den Unterricht in öffentlichen Grund- und Mittelschulen und privaten Ergänzungsschulen [Mathematics education in Japan: An overview of instruction in public elementary and secondary schools and private supplementary schools]. In V. Schubert (Ed.), Lernkultur – Das Beispiel Japan [Learning culture – the example of Japan] (pp. 45–76). Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag.Google Scholar
  87. Seiyama, K. (1981). Gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no kōka ni kansuru ichikōsatsu [A study of the effects of out-of-school educational investment]. Hokudai Bungakubu Kiyō, 30(1), 171–221.Google Scholar
  88. Seiyama, K., & Noguchi, Y. (1984). Kōkō shingaku ni okeru gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no kōka [The effects of outside of school educational investments at the transition to high school]. Kyōiku Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 39, 113–126.Google Scholar
  89. Shavit, Y., & Blossfeld, H.-P. (1993). Persistent inequality: Changing educational attainment in thirteen countries. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  90. Shavit, Y., & Park, H. (2016). Introduction to the special issue: Education as a positional good. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Silova, I., Budiene, V., & Bray, M. (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. Overview and country reports. Budapest: Education Support Program (ESP) of the Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
  92. Southgate, D. E. (2009). Determinants of shadow education – A cross-national analysis. Ohio: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  93. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1639–1657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teacher’s for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  95. Stigler, J. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1991). How Asian teachers polish each lesson to perfection. American Educator, 15(1), 12–20.Google Scholar
  96. Tachibanaki, T. (1998). Nihon no keizai kakusa [Japan’s economic inequality]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.Google Scholar
  97. Takayama, K. (2008). The politics of international league tables: PISA in Japan’s achievement crisis debate. Comparative Education, 44(4), 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Takayama, K. (2011). OECD’s PISA, media sensationalism, and education reform in Japan. Asia Pacific Memo (2011-01-13). Retrieved from: http://www.asiapacificmemo.ca/pisa-media-japan
  99. Tansel, A., & Bircan, F (2004). Private tutoring expenditures in Turkey (Turkish Economic Association Discussion Paper 13).Google Scholar
  100. Tobishima, S. (2012a). Gakuryoku no kaisōsa no kakudai to kazoku no kyōiku senryaku: Gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi ni yoru kakusa kakudaisetsu no saikentō [The role of shadow education in the growing inequality in academic achievement]. Shakaigaku Kenkyū, 91, 195–214.Google Scholar
  101. Tobishima, S. (2012b). Kōkōsei no gakushū jikan ni taisuru sōki gakkōgai kyōiku tōshi no eikyō [Impact of early outside of school education on learning time of high school students]. Nenpō Shakaigaku Ronshū, 25, 144–155.Google Scholar
  102. Tomura, Akihito, Ryōichi Nishimaru & Teruya Oda (2011). Kyōiku tōshi no kitei yōin to kōka: Gakkōgai kyōiku to shiritsu chūgaku shingaku o chūshin ni [Determinants and effects of investments in education: Focusing on out-of-school education and the transition to private middle schools]. In Y. Satō & F. Ojima (Eds.), Gendai no kaisō shakai: Kakusa to tayōsei [Modern class society: Disparity and diversity] (pp. 267–280). Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  103. Treiman, D. J., & Yamaguchi, K. (1993). Trends in Educational Attainment in Japan. In Y. Shavit & H.-P. Blossfeld (Eds.), Persistent Inequality – Changing Educational Attainment in Thirteen Countries (pp. 229–249). Boulder/San Francisco/Oxford: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  104. Urabe, M., Ono, A., & Acosta, S. A. (2013). The consequences of changing education policies on social inequality: The case of Japan. In M. Windzio (Ed.), Integration and inequality in educational institutions (pp. 153–163). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Watanabe, M. (2012). Gakushū juku ni okeru zatsudan: Jukuchō e no shitsumonshichōsa kara [Chatting about Academic Juku: Findings from a questionnaire survey of Juku heads]. Paper presented at the 64th Conference of the Japan Society of Educational Sociology, Doshisha University, Kyoto.Google Scholar
  106. Watanabe, M. (2013). Juku: The stealth force of education and the deterioration of schools in Japan. North Charleston: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  107. Wiseman, A. W. (2013). Policy responses to PISA in comparative perspective. In H.-D. Meyer & A. Benavot (Eds.), PISA, power, and policy: The emergence of global educational governance (pp. 303–322). Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
  108. Yamato, Y. & Zhang, W. (2017). Changing schooling, changing shadow: Shapes and functions of juku in Japan. Asia Pacific Journal of Educatio n, 37(3), 329–343.Google Scholar
  109. Yuki, M., Sato, A., & Hashisako, K. (1987). Gakushū juku – Kodomo, oya, kyōshi wa dō miteiru ka [Academic Juku – How do children, parents, and teachers view them?]. Tokyo: Gyōsei.Google Scholar
  110. Zeng, K. (1999). Dragon gate, competitive examinations and their consequences. London/New York: Cassell.Google Scholar
  111. Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2017). Micro-neoliberalism in China: public-private interactions at the confluence of mainstream and shadow education. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Zhang, Y., & Xie, Y. (2016). Family background, private tutoring, and children’s educational performance in contemporary China. Chinese Sociological Review, 48(1), 64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department for Education, Social Science Educational ResearchUniversity of PotsdamPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations