Abstract
In this chapter we will survey the rational choice approaches for normative ethics developed in the second part of the twentieth century. Some of these approaches belong to contractarian ethics but our main focus will be not on a social contract but on rational choice. We will survey and evaluate the contributions of several prominent thinkers (Rawls, Nozick, Sen, Harsanyi, and Scanlon) from the lens of the scientific approach to ethics to demonstrate that its principles have a crucial importance to the progress on normative ethics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The idea of veil of ignorance was earlier introduced by the economist John Harsanyi (see further in this chapter).
References
Carroll, Sean. 2010a. The Moral Equivalent of the Parallel Postulate. Cosmic Variance, March 24.
———. 2010b. Sam Harris Responds. Cosmic Variance, March 29.
———. 2010c. Science and Morality: You Can’t Derive “Ought” from “Is.” Cosmic Variance, May 3.
Gauthier, David P. 1967. Morality and Advantage. The Philosophical Review 76: 460–475.
———. 1969. The Logic of Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford University Press.
Gauthier, David. 1977. The Social Contract as Ideology. Philosophy & Public Affairs 6: 130–164.
Harris, Sam. 2011. The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values. Simon and Schuster.
Harsanyi, J. 1953. Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking. Journal of Political Economy 61 (5): 434–435.
Harsanyi, John C. 1975. Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls’s Theory. American Political Science Review 69 (2): 594–606.
———. 1977. Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior. Social Research 44: 623–656.
Kavka, Gregory S. 1987. Mind. New Series, 96(381): 117–121.
Rawls, John. 1958. Justice as Fairness. The Philosophical Review 67: 164–194.
———. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas M. 1982. Contractualism and Utilitarianism. In Utilitarianism and Beyond, ed. Amartya Sen and Bernard Williams, 103–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scanlon, Thomas. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Harvard University Press.
Sen, Amartya. 1974. Rawls Versus Bentham: An Axiomatic Examination of the Pure Distribution Problem. Theory and Decision 4 (3): 301–309.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Storchevoy, M. (2018). Contractarianism and Rational Choice. In: A Scientific Approach to Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69113-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69113-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69112-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69113-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)