Advertisement

Why Science? What Science?

  • Maxim Storchevoy
Chapter
  • 450 Downloads

Abstract

Is it possible to build ethics like a science? Many ordinary people think that this is impossible because there are too many subjective opinions and disagreements. Many scholars think that this is not necessary and some of them emphasize that there is no true science at all. However, is it so? Can the “impossible” or “unnecessary” theses, be proved? This chapter suggests the opposite. We can and should rebuild ethics as a science. First, it will help to significantly increase its analytical quality and achieve better theoretical progress. Second, it will upgrade the weak status of this discipline in society and business.

Keywords

Business ethics Ethics Science Truth Verification 

References

  1. Alpay, E. 2011. Student-Inspired Activities for the Teaching and Learning of Engineering Ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4): 1455–1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Børsen, T., A. Antia, and M. Glessmer. 2013. A Case Study of Teaching Social Responsibility to Doctoral Students in the Climate Sciences. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4): 1491–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Copp, David, ed. 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Hausman, Daniel, Michael McPherson, and Debra Satz. 2016. Economic Analysis, Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Holland, Daniel, and Chad Albrecht. 2013. The Worldwide Academic Field of Business Ethics: Scholars’ Perceptions of the Most Important Issues. Journal of Business Ethics 117 (4): 777–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Honderich, Ted, ed. 2005. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kolb, R.W., ed. 2007. Encyclopedia of Business Ethics and Society. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  8. Nowell-Smith, P.H. 1952. Ethics. London, Penguine Books.Google Scholar
  9. Ozaktas, H. 2011. Teaching Science, Technology, and Society to Engineering Students: A Sixteen Year Journey. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4): 1439–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Solomon, Robert C. 1992. Corporate Roles, Personal Virtues: An Aristotelean Approach to Business Ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 2 (3): 317–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Takala, A.J., and K. Korhonen-Yrjänheikki. 2011. A National Collaboration Process: Finnish Engineering Education for the Benefit of People and Environment. Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (4): 1557–1569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Werhane, Patricia H., and R. Edward Freeman. 2005. The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Management: Business Ethics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Zandvoort, H., T. Børsen, M. Deneke, and S.J. Bird. 2013. Editors’ Overview Perspectives on Teaching Social Responsibility to Students in Science and Engineering. Science & Engineering Ethics 19 (4): 1413–1438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maxim Storchevoy
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of ManagementSt. Petersburg UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.National Research University Higher School of EconomicsSt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations