Skip to main content

Spielberg as Filmmaker

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Steven Spielberg's Style by Stealth

Abstract

In attempting to understand the degree to which a filmmaker controls the construction of narrative (Bordwell’s ‘intentionality’), we also need to ascertain which agent or agents are responsible for specific parts of a film: the director, the producer, the writer, the star, etc. A contrasting perspective can be seen in Janet Staiger’s (2003, p. 31) consideration of W. K. Wimsatt and M. C. Beardsley’s ‘intentional fallacy’ where the emphasis on the meaning in the narrative is placed with the spectator. Gregory Currie (1995, pp. 245–249) forgoes his ‘Real Author Intentionalism’ for ‘Implied Author Intentionalism’ suggesting that how works are interpreted is more important than authorial intention. Torben Grodal (2004) considers the links between intentionality, consciousness and free will and the claim that these are superseded by ‘… language, culture, discourses, or unconscious traumas’ (p. 27). Arguing for the role of intentionality in the creative process he points out ‘Somehow, the fact that the function of consciousness and intentions are influenced by non-conscious factors has been interpreted as if consciousness has no role whatever’. Staiger (2000, pp. 37–39) constructs ‘perverse spectators’—her term for audiences that do not necessarily perceive or react as expected. Criticising the ‘normative description’ as a blanket definition for the nature of the audience, she lists seven instances of inaccuracies in the way audiences are defined. These range from their artificial construct at the hands of scholars to a lack of recognition in audience variety, erroneous assumptions about why audiences watch films and inaccuracy in the assumed knowledge of audiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    King is clearly referencing Spielberg’s own experience of his parents’ divorce during his childhood.

  2. 2.

    Spielberg as signature applies literally in the case of the Universal Studios series of laser discs noted in the introduction. Released in the late 1990s, they were marketed as the ‘Signature Collection’ with Spielberg’s signature featured prominently as part of the artwork. Spielberg’s signature also appears on a recently released Blu-ray set from Universal , Steven Spielberg Director’s Collection.

  3. 3.

    For example, as Raymond Bellour in The Analysis of Film (2000) illustrates in his prominent, shot-by-shot analyses of scenes from Hitchcock’s films first published in the 1960s.

  4. 4.

    Always also under-performed at the box office. As already noted, The BFG is a recent big-budget production that delivered disappointing box-office returns.

  5. 5.

    The wide reverse is explained and examined in Chaps. 6 and 7.

  6. 6.

    Khan did not edit E.T. as he was cutting Poltergeist (1982), which was written and produced by Spielberg.

  7. 7.

    Bordwell has made a similar observation of this director.

  8. 8.

    Julia Philips (1991) claims that while taking publicity stills with the camera team during the production of Close Encounters, Spielberg refused to allow any photos to be taken of her looking through the film camera.

  9. 9.

    Williams did not compose The Color Purple or Spielberg’s segment of The Twilight Zone Movie (1985) and he was unavailable for Bridge of Spies because of illness. He did compose the score for the two Amazing Stories episodes directed by Spielberg.

  10. 10.

    Melissa Mathison wrote both E.T. and The BFG.

  11. 11.

    A.I.’s box office was considered disappointing by Spielberg standards and the film was harshly criticised by some critics for supposedly distorting Kubrick’s vision—criticism rejected by Spielberg.

  12. 12.

    Coverage refers to the camera shots used to shoot or ‘cover’ a scene.

  13. 13.

    This conception of the camera as replicating spectator perception is revisited in cognitive theory and examined in Chap. 8.

References

  • Altman, R. (2008). A Theory of Narrative. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Film Institute. (1995). Steven Spielberg Interview [Video File]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcM6sDKrX1M

  • Andrew, D. (1993). The Unauthorized Auteur Today. In J. Collins, H. Redner, & A. P. Collins (Eds.), Film Theory Goes to the Movies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • B, B. (2006). The Price of Revenge. American Cinematographer, 87(2), 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazin, A. (1985). On the politique des auteurs. In J. Hiller (Ed.) & P. Graham (Trans.). Cahiers du Cinema The 1950’s Neo-Realism, Hollywood, New Wave. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellour, R. (2000). The Analysis of Film. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettinson, G. (2009). Reappraising Always. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 7(1), 33–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (1977). Camera Movement and Cinematic Space. Cine-Tracts, 1(2). Retrieved from http://library.brown.edu/cds/cinetracts/CT02.pdf

  • Bordwell, D. (1979). The Art Cinema as Mode of Film Practice. Film Criticism, 4(1). Retrieved from Academic Search Premier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration and the Fiction Film. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (1989). Making Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (2008). The Poetics of Cinema. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (2011). Do Filmmakers Deserve the Last Word? In D. Bordwell & K. Thompson (Eds.), Minding Movies: Observations on the Art, Craft, and Business of Filmmaking. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (1985). Towards a Scientific Film History? Quarterly Review of Film Studies, 10(3), 224–237. Retrieved from Taylor & Francis Media, Cultural & Communication Studies Online Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (2008). Film Art. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouzereau, L. (Writer & Producer). (2004). Saving Private Ryan: Making Saving Private Ryan [Blu-ray supplement in S. Spielberg (Director), Saving Private Ryan]. Australia: DreamWorks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branigan, E. (1981). The Spectator and Film Space—Two Theories. Screen, 22(1). Retrieved from http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/

  • Branigan, E. (2006). Projecting a Camera: Language Games in Film Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, W. (2006). Directed by Steven Spielberg: Poetics of the Contemporary Hollywood Blockbuster. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, N. (1982). Narrative/Diegesis Thresholds, Limits. Screen, 23(2), 16–33. Retrieved from http://screen.oxfordjournals.org

  • Caldwell, J. T. (2008). Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (1988). Mystifying Movies: Fads and Fallacies in Contemporary Film Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. (1995). Image and Mind: Film, Philosophy and Cognitive Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. (1996). Film, Reality, and Illusion. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., & Shay, D. (1993). The Making of Jurassic Park. An Adventure 65 Million Years in the Making. London: Boxtree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R. (1994). The Kid Stays in the Picture. Glasgow: Harper Collins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstner, D. A. (2003). The Practices of Authorship. In A. Gerstner & J. Staiger (Eds.), Authorship and Film. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grodal, T. (2004). Agency in Film, Filmmaking, and Reception. In T. Grodal, B. Larsen, & I. T. Laursen (Eds.), Visual Authorship: Creativity and Intentionality in Media. Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press and the Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Head, S. (2002). An Interview with Steven Spielberg. Retrieved from http://au.ign.com/articles/2002/12/17/an-interview-with-steven-spielberg?page=1

  • Heath, S. (1976). Narrative Space. Screen, 17(3). Retrieved from http://screen.oxfordjournals.org/

  • Helpern, D. (2000). At Sea with Steven Spielberg. In L. D. Friedman & B. Notbohm (Eds.), Steven Spielberg Interviews. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2004). Auteurs and Their Brains: Cognition and Creativity in the Cinema. In T. Grodal, B. Larsen, & I. T. Laursen (Eds.), Visual Authorship: Creativity and Intentionality in Media. Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press and the Authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kael, P. (1994). For Keeps: 30 Years at the Movies. New York: Plume/Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapsis, R. (1992). Hitchcock, The Making of a Reputation. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G. (2002). New Hollywood Cinema: An Introduction. London: L.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listal. (2012). Steven Spielberg’s Favorite Films. Retrieved from http://www.listal.com/list/steven-spielbergs-favorite-films

  • Livingston, P. (2005). Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McBride, J. (1997). Steven Spielberg: A Biography. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. (C. Britton, A. Williams, B. Brewster, & A. Guzzetti, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naremore, J. (1999). Authorship. In T. Miller & R. Stam (Eds.), A Companion to Film Theory. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. (2000). Genre and Hollywood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (1976). Introduction. In B. Nichols (Ed.), Movies and Methods Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. (1991). You’ll Never Eat Lunch in This Town Again. New York: New American Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzello, S. (1997). Chase, Crush and Devour. American Cinematographer, 78(6), 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, S. (1978). The Mind Behind ‘Close Encounters of the Third Kind’. American Cinematographer, 59(2), 111–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pudovkin, V. I. (1959). Film Technique and Film Acting: The Cinema Writings of V.I. Pudovkin (I. Montagu, Trans.). New York: Bonanza Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabinow, P. (1984). The Foucault Reader: An Introduction to Foucault’s Thought. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salt, B. (2011). Reaction Time: How to Edit Movies. New Review of Film and Television Studies, 9(3), 341–357. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2011.585865

  • Schickel, R. (Writer & Director). (2007). Spielberg on Spielberg [DVD documentary]. United States: Turner Classic Movies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shone, T. (2004). Blockbuster. London: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spielberg, S. (1981). Of Narrow Misses and Close Calls. American Cinematographer, 62(11), 152–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, J. (2000). Perverse Spectators: The Practices of Film Reception. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staiger, J. (2003). Authorship Approaches. In D. A. Gerstner & J. Staiger (Eds.), Authorship and Film. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starski, A. (1994). Art Direction: From Wajda to Spielberg. In J. Boorman & W. Donohue (Eds.), Projections 3: Film-makers on Film-Making (pp. 69–80). England: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomashevsky, B. (1965). Thematics. In L. T. Lemon, M. J. Reis, & M. J. Lincoln (Trans.). Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (pp. 61–98). London: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybjerg, C. (2004). The Makers of Movies: Authors, Subjects, Personalities, Agents? In T. Grodal, B. Larsen, & I. T. Laursen (Eds.), Visual Authorship Creativity and Intentionality in Media (pp. 37–66). Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press and the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollen, P. (1998). Signs and Meaning in the Cinema (4th ed.). London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wollen, P. (2003). The Auteur Theory: Michael Curtiz and Casablanca. In D. A. Gerstner & J. Staiger (Eds.), Authorship and Film. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mairata, J. (2018). Spielberg as Filmmaker. In: Steven Spielberg's Style by Stealth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69081-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics