Skip to main content

Conclusion: Style by Stealth

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

If we return to my initial proposition that the early and continued popularity of Spielberg’s films is in part due to his unique control of style and how he deploys it to construct narrative, we can now bring together all considered areas to determine the likely significance of style. At the same time, it is also important to bear in mind that the specific or unequivocal significance accorded style in contributing to the popularity of Spielberg’s films in comparison to other factors is impossible to determine in and of itself. For example, Jaws was chosen by Spielberg as a film project because of its conceptual appeal. He found the story intriguing and believed it would make a good film. The subject matter was a key contributor to the film’s success as evidenced by its popularity as a novel. Whether another director could have as successfully or even more successfully transitioned the subject matter from novel to film narrative is impossible to determine. We can point to the two inferior Jaws sequels as a partial indicator of how other directors fared in realising the concept as filmic narratives. Another evolving gauge may be glimpsed in the future remaking of some of Spielberg’s most popular films. The 2015 critical and popular failure of the Poltergeist remake is one such example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When combined with the new, compact camera technology and influence of the latest documentary techniques, both of which permitted a more mobile camera as noted in the introduction.

  2. 2.

    A more pragmatic explanation is that Hitchcock was widely known to dislike location filming.

References

  • Awalt, S. (2014). Steven Spielberg and Duel: The Making of a Film Career. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biskind, P. (1998). Easy Riders, Raging Bulls: How the Sex-Drugs-and-Rock and Roll Generation Saved Hollywood. New York: Touchstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D. (2010). The Part-time Cognitivist: A View from Film Studies. Projections, 4(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branigan, E. (2006). Projecting a Camera: Language Games in Film Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, J., & Brooks, V. (1996). Movies in the Mind’s Eye. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.), Post-Theory: Reconstructing Film Studies (pp. 368–387). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, P. C. (2004). Auteurs and Their Brains: Cognition and Creativity in the Cinema. In T. Grodal, B. Larsen, & I. T. Laursen (Eds.), Visual Authorship: Creativity and Intentionality in Media (pp. 67–86). Denmark: Museum Tusculanum Press and the authors.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holben, J. (2002). Criminal Intent. American Cinematographer., 83(7), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapsis, R. (1992). Hitchcock, The Making of a Reputation. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, R. N. (1987). The Influence of Camera Angle on Comprehension and Retention of Pictorial Events. Memory and Cognition. 15(4), 291–307. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758%2FBF03197032#page-1

  • McBride, J. (1997). Steven Spielberg: A Biography. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (2005). The Power of Movies: How Screen and Mind Interact. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzello, S. (1997). Chase, Crush and Devour. American Cinematographer., 78(6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantnga, C. (2011). Folk Psychology for Film Critics and Students. Projections, 5(2), 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. M. (2003). Film Structure and the Emotion System. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, E. S. (1996). Emotion and the Structure of Narrative Film: Film as an Emotion Machine. New Jersey: Lawrence Eribaum Associates Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Tybjerg, C. (2008) [DVD Audio Commentary in C. T. Dreyer (Director) Vampyr. Motion picture]. United Kingdom: Eureka Entertainment Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, F. (2010). Steven Spielberg’s America. Cambridge and. Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. (1977). Hitchcock’s Films. New Jersey: A.S. Barnes & Company.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mairata, J. (2018). Conclusion: Style by Stealth. In: Steven Spielberg's Style by Stealth. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69081-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics