Skip to main content

Domestic Violence/Intimate Partner Violence/Wife Battering

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Criminal Victimization of Immigrants

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

  • 571 Accesses

Abstract

Violence between intimate partners is a universal phenomenon. It reflects patriarchal social orders that exist everywhere, but are stronger in developing countries. Feminists and women’s rights advocates have received global support for their attempts to eliminate violence against women. But anti-woman cultural practices flourish in many countries and immigrant women from those cultures are especially vulnerable. Even immigration law puts them at a disadvantage. Mail order brides are at high risk of violence and death.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Safire (1998).

  2. 2.

    World Health Organization (2016).

  3. 3.

    Carr Center for Human Rights Policy (1992).

  4. 4.

    Menjivar and Salcido (2002) .

  5. 5.

    Dhakal (2008).

  6. 6.

    Truman and Morgan (2014), FRA (2014), National Coalition Against Domestic Violence (2015).

  7. 7.

    Sherman and Berk (1984).

  8. 8.

    Since 1864 (Bradley v. State) and as recently as 1962 (Joyner v. Joyner), American courts have recognized the husband’s right to use the degree of force necessary to compel the wife to “behave” and “know her place.” Cited in (Erez 2002).

  9. 9.

    Hodgson (1995), Kelly et al. (1999), Haj-Yahia (2009), Kim and Sung (2014), Douki et al. (2003), Robinson (2003), Alhabib et al. (2010), Esquivel-Santoveña et al. (2013).

  10. 10.

    Douki et al. (2003) .

  11. 11.

    Douki et al. (2003) . Douki and associates argue that “a fair reading of the Koran shows that wife abuse, like genital mutilation and honour killings are a result of culture rather than religion.”

  12. 12.

    Menjivar and Salcido (2002) .

  13. 13.

    FRA (2014). See also Mahapatra and DiNitto (2013).

  14. 14.

    Hass et al. (2006).

  15. 15.

    Morrison et al. (1999: 156). Cited in Menjivar and Salcido (2002: 904).

  16. 16.

    Douki et al. (2003).

  17. 17.

    Douki et al. (2003) .

  18. 18.

    Douki et al. (2003) .

  19. 19.

    Douki et al. (2003).

  20. 20.

    Mahapatra (2012). See also Niaz (2003).

  21. 21.

    Vidales (2010).

  22. 22.

    Menjivar and Salcido (2002: 908) .

  23. 23.

    Hass et al. (2006), Raj et al. (2005), Erez and Ammar (2003).

  24. 24.

    Diocson (2001).

  25. 25.

    Cunneen and Stubbs (2002: 161).

  26. 26.

    Cunneen and Stubbs (2002).

  27. 27.

    Ferry (2006).

  28. 28.

    Ferry (2006), Porter (2006).

  29. 29.

    Porter (2006).

References

  • Alhabib, S., U. Nur, and R. Jones. 2010. Domestic Violence Against Women: Systematic Review of Prevalence Studies. Journal of Family Violence 25(4): 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9298-4. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Harvard University. 1992. CEDAW General Recommendation No. 19—1992 Violence Against Women. (Violence Against Women Research Database). Harvard University. https://projects.iq.harvard.edu/violenceagainstwomen/publications/cedawgeneral-recommendation-191992cedaw-general-recommendation. Accessed 1 June 2017.

  • Cunneen, Chris, and Julie Stubbs. 2002. Migration, Political Economy and Violence Against Women: The Post Immigration Experience of Filipino Women in Australia. In Migration, Culture Conflict and Crime, ed. J.D. Freilich, G. Newman, S.G. Shoham, and M. Addad, 159–183. Dartmouth: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal, Sanjaya. 2008. Nepalese Women Under the Shadow of Domestic Violence. The Lancet 371 (9612): 547–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diocson, Cecilia. 2001. Filipino Women’s Identity: A Social, Cultural and Economic Segregation in Canada. Presentation given by the Philippine Women Centre at “Towards the Transformation of Race and Gender,” A Conference Organized by the Race and Gender Teaching Advisory Group at the University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douki, S., F. Nacef, A. Belhadj, A. Bouasker, and R. Ghachem. 2003. Violence Against Women in Arab and Islamic Countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 6 (3): 165–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, Edna. 2002. Migration/Immigration: Domestic Violence and the Justice System. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 26 (2, Fall): 277–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erez, Edna, and Nawal Ammar. 2003. Violence Against Immigrant Women and Systemic Responses: An Exploratory Study. Report Submitted to National Institute of Justice. Doc. No. 202561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel-Santoveña, Esteban Eugenio, Teri L. Lambert, and John Hamel. 2013. Partner Abuse Worldwide. Partner Abuse 4 (1): 6–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, Barbara. 2006. Federal Law: Marriage Brokers Say New Client Disclosure Requirements Violate Free Speech. September 24. http://Newmexican.com . Accessed 13 June 2007.

  • FRA, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. 2014. Violence Against Women: An EU-Wide Survey: Main Results. Vienna: FRA, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. http://fra.europa.eu/en/publication/2014/violence-against-women-eu-wide-survey-main-results-report. Accessed 1 June 2017.

  • Haj-Yahia, Muhammad M. 2009. Palestinian Physicians’ Misconceptions About and Approval of Wife Abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 25 (3): 416–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hass, Giselle A., Nawal Ammar, and Leslye Orloff. 2006. Battered Immigrants and US Citizens Spouses. Legal Momentum, April 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, Douglas. 1995. Sex Tourism and Child Prostitution in Asia: Legal Responses and Strategies. The Melbourne University Law Review 19 (3): 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., J. Bindel, S. Burton, D. Butterworth, K. Cook, and L. Regan. 1999. Domestic Violence Matters: An Evaluation of a Development Project. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jae Yop, and Sung. 2014. Conjugal Violence in Korean American Families: A Residue of the Cultural Tradition. Journal of Family Violence 15 (4): 331–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra, N. 2012. South Asian Women in the United States and Their Experience with Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence 27(5): 381–390. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10896-012-9434-4. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • Mahapatra, Neely., and Dianna M. DiNitto. 2013. Help-Seeking Behaviors of South Asian Women Experiencing Domestic Violence in the United States. Partner Abuse 4 (3): 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menjivar, Cecilia, and Olivia Salcido. 2002. Immigrant Women and Domestic Violence: Common Experiences in Different Countries. Gender and Society 16 (6, December): 898–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, Lynn, Sepali Guruge, and Kymberly A. Snarr. 1999. Sri Lankan Tamil Immigrants in Toronto: Gender, Marriage Patterns, and Sexuality. In Gender and Immigration, ed. G. Kelson and D. DeLaet, 144–162. New York, NY: New York University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. 2015. Domestic Violence. Denver, CO: National Coalition Against Domestic Violence. https://ncadv.org/learn-more/statistics. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • Niaz, U. 2003. Violence Against Women in South Asian Countries. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 6 (3): 173–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Eduardo. 2006. Law on Overseas Brides is Keeping Couples Apart. The New York Times, October 17, Late—Final edition, A, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raj, Anita, Silverman Jay, J. McCleary-Sills, and R. Liu. 2005. Immigration Policies Increase South Asian Immigrant Women’s Vulnerability to Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of the American Medical Women’s Association 60 (10): 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Matthew B. 2003. The McDonaldization of America’s Police, Courts and Corrections. In McDonaldization: The Reader, ed. G. Ritzer, 77–90. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safire, William. 1998. On Language; Misrule of Thumb. The New York Times Magazine, January 25. http://www.nytimes.com/1998/01/25/magazine/on-language-misrule-of-thumb.html. Accessed 1 June 2017.

  • Sherman, Lawrence W., and Richard A. Berk. 1984. Specific Deterrent Effects of Arrest for Domestic Assault. American Sociological Review 49 (2, April): 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truman, Jennifer L., and Rachel E. Morgan. 2014. Nonfatal Domestic Violence: 2003–2012 (Special Report NCJ 244697). https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ndv0312.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2017.

  • Vidales, Guadalupe T. 2010. Arrested Justice: The Multifaceted Plight of Immigrant Latinas Who Faced Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence 25(6): 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9309-5. Accessed 6 June 2017.

  • World Health Organization. 2016. Violence Against Women: Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Against Women (Fact Sheet). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs239/en/. Accessed 1 June 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McDonald, W.F. (2018). Domestic Violence/Intimate Partner Violence/Wife Battering. In: The Criminal Victimization of Immigrants. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69062-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69062-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69061-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69062-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics