Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Navigation Around Tumor Board Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Team-Based Oncology Care: The Pivotal Role of Oncology Navigation

  • 889 Accesses

Abstract

A general multidisciplinary cancer conference or tumor board is one of the five foundations for the basic structure of an accredited cancer program by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) program accreditation. The navigator is an extended member of this team and often a core responsibility within a nurse navigator’s job description calls for the role of patient advocacy in tumor conference participation. A literature review to explore exactly what a navigator contributed to a cancer conference or tumor board revealed sparse comments in limited publications on the subject. The Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators (AONN+) has conducted sessions on this topic at their annual conferences and website videos on navigators’ participation around tumor boards. To further clarify the role of a navigator around tumor board activities, AONN+ asked its members to reply to a survey titled Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Questionnaire in the spring of 2017. The results of this survey are shared in three phases of tumor board participation—case preparation, activities during the actual tumor board, and follow-up after the discussion. A discussion on CME activities, legal implications, navigator participation within their professional role boundaries, and metrics are also discussed. The navigator can proactively recognize the need for a tumor board consult, champion the unique needs of each patient during the discussion, promote adherence to planned treatment, and support patients during transitions of care regarding future issues related to treatment goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Cancer Institute Dictionaries. Multidisciplinary. 2017. www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms?cdrid=335079.

  2. Horvath L, Yordan E, Malhotra D, Leyva I, Bortel K, Schalk D, et al. Multidisciplinary care in the oncology setting: historical perspective and data from lung and gynecology multidisciplinary clinics. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6(6):e21–6. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2010.000073.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Pradesa J, Remueb E, van Hoofc E, Borrasa J. Is it worth reorganising cancer services on the basis of multidisciplinary teams (MDTs)? A systematic review of the objectives and organisation of MDTs and their impact on patient outcomes. Health Policy. 2015;119(4):464–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hunnibell L, Rose M, Connery D, Grens C, Hampel J, Rosa M, Vogel D. Using nurse navigation to improve timeliness of lung cancer care at a veterans hospital. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012;16(1):29–36. https://doi.org/10.1188/12.CJON.29-36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilcox B, Bruce S. Patient navigation: a “win-win” for all involved. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):21–5. https://doi.org/10.1188/10.ONF.21-25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seek A, Hogle W. Modeling a better way: navigating the healthcare system for patients with lung cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2007;11(1):81–5. https://doi.org/10.1188/07.CJON.81-85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keating N, Landrum M, Lamont E, Bozeman S, Shulman L, McNeil B. Tumor boards and the quality of cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(2):113–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djs502.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamb B, Green J, Benn J, Brown K, Vincent C, Sevdalis N. Improving decision making in multidisciplinary tumor boards: prospective longitudinal evaluation of a multicomponent intervention for 1,421 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(3):412–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pillay B, Wootten A, Crowe H, Corcoran N, Tran B, Bowden P, Crowe J, Costello A. The impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Treat Rev. 2015;42:56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saghir N, Charara R, Kreidieh F, Eaton V, Litvin K, Farhat R, Khoury K, Breidy J, Tamim H, Eid T. Global practice and efficiency of multidisciplinary tumor boards: results of an American Society of Clinical Oncology International survey. J Global Oncol. 2015;1(2):57–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Charara R, Kreidieh F, Farhat R, Al-Feghali K, Khoury K, Haydar A, Nassar L, Berjawi G, Shamseddine A, Saghir N. Practice and impact of multidisciplinary tumor boards on patient management: A prospective study. J Global Oncol. 2016;3(3):242–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.2016.004960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brauer D, Strand M, Sanford D, Kushnir V, Lim K, Mullady D, Tan B, Wang-Gillam A, Morton A, Ruzinova M, Parikh P, Narra V, Fowler K, Doyle M, Chapman W, Strasberg S, Hawkins W, Fields R. Utility of a multidisciplinary tumor board in the management of pancreatic and upper gastrointestinal diseases: an observational study. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(2):133–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuroki L, Stuckey A, Hirway P, Raker C, Bandera C, DiSilvestro P, Granai C, Lagare R, Sakr B, Dizon D. Addressing clinical trials: can the multidisciplinary tumor board improve participation? A study from an academic women’s cancer program. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;116:295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.12.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kehl K, Landrum M, Kahn K, Gray S, Chen A, Keating N. Tumor board participation among physicians caring for patients with lung or colorectal cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2015;11(3):e267–78. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2015.003673.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Shea C, Teal R, Haynes-Maslow L, McIntyre M, Weiner BJ, Wheeler SB, et al. Assessing the feasibility of a virtual tumor board program: a case study. J Healthc Manag. 2014;59(3):177–93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer. Cancer conference policy. 2016. www.facs.org/quality-programs/cancer/coc/standards

  17. National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers. Interdisciplinary breast cancer conference. 2014. www.facs.org/~/media/files/quality%20programs/napbc/2014%20napbc%20standards%20manual.ashx

  18. Swanson J, Strusowski P, Mack N, Degroot J. Growing a navigation program using the NCCCP Navigation Assessment Tool. 2012. http://www.accc-cancer.org/oncology_issues/.../JA12-Growing-a-Navigation-Program.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Newcomer B. A national system approach to oncology patient population management across the continuum of care: how we standardized navigation. Nurs Admin Quart. 2014;38(2):138–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Malone P, Bruno L, Hayden B, Carlson J. Development and evolution of an oncology nurse navigation program: from formation to fruitation. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2014;5(5):19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Academy of Oncology Nurse & Patient Navigators. Core competencies for oncology nurse navigator–certified generalists. 2017. www.aonnonline.org/certification/nurse-navigator-certification

  22. Oncology Nursing Society. 2017 Oncology nurse navigator core competencies. 2017. www.ons.org/sites/default/files/2017ONNcompetencies.pdf

  23. Advisory Board Company. Six opportunities to get the most out of your patient navigation program. 2016. www.advisory.com/research/oncology-roundtable/resources/2016/patient-navigation.

  24. Messier N. The navigator’s role in coordinating multidisciplinary clinics and tumor boards. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2010;1(6):21.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burton E, Mathis L. The nurse navigator’s participation in tumor boards: a valuable communication vehicle presentation at the Academy of Oncology Nurse Navigators 4th Annual Navigation & Survivorship Conference November 14–17, 2013 in Memphis, TN; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fala L. Highlights form the fourth annual navigation and survivorship conference. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2014;5(2):4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shockney L. Why navigators should attend tumor boards. 2017. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/178-why-navigators-should-attend-tumor-boards.

  28. Delarama F. Role of the oncology nurse navigator in tumor boards and multidisciplinary settings. 2014. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/512-role-of-the-oncology-nurse-navigator-in-tumor-boards-and-multidisciplinary-settings.

  29. Skinner N. Role of the oncology nurse navigator in tumor boards and multidisciplinary settings. 2014. www.aonnonline.org/education/video-library/518-nancy-skinner-role-of-the-oncology-nurse-navigator-in-tumor-boards-and-multidisciplinary-settings.

  30. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Resources for planning and monitoring regularly scheduled series (RSS). 2017. www.accme.org/education-and-support/video/tutorials/resources-planning-and-monitoring-regularly-scheduled-series.

  31. Gatcliffe T, Coleman R. Tumor board: more than treatment planning—a 1-year prospective survey. J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(4):235–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sarff M, Rogers W, Blanke C, Vetto J. Evaluation of the tumor board as a Continuing Medical Education (CME) activity: is it useful? J Cancer Educ. 2008;23(1):51–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gentry S, Sellers J. Navigation considerations when working with patients. In: Blaseg K, Daugherty P, Gamblin K, editors. Oncolgy nurse navigation delivering patient-centered care across the continuum. Pittsburgh, PA: Oncology Nursing Society; 2014. p. 71–120.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McMullen L. Oncology nurse navigators and the continuum of cancer care. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2013;29(2):105–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Johnson F. The process of oncology nurse practitioner patient navigation: a pilot study. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016;20(2):207–10. https://doi.org/10.1188/16CJON.207-210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schafer J, Swisher J. Cancer care coordination with nurse navigators. 2006. www.sg2.com/wp.../05/Cancer-Care-Coordination-with-Nurse-Navigators.pdf.

  37. Plante A, Joannette S. Monteregie Comprehensive Care Centre: integrating nurse navigators in Monteregie’s oncology teams: the process—part 2. Can Oncol Nurs J. 2009;19:72–7. PMID: 19757765.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bellomo C. Nurse navigation certification learning guide—care coordination. J Oncol Navig Surviv. 2016;7(5):30–2.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Germain D, Dimond E, Olesen K, Ellison C, Nacpil N, Gansauer L, Carrigan A, Igo K, Gonzalez M. The NCCCP Patient Navigation Project using patient navigators to enhance clinical trial education and promote accrual. Oncol Issues. 2014;May–June:44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gross G. The role of tumor board in a community hospital. CA Cancer J Clin. 1987;37(2):88–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Academy of Oncology Nurse Navigators. Standardized metrics source document. 2017. https://www.aonnonline.org/metrics-source-document. Accessed 17 Jun 2017.

  42. Strusowski P, Stapp J. Patient navigation metrics. Oncol Issues. January–February:62–9.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shockney L. The evolution of patient navigation and survivorship care. Breast J. 2014;21(1):104–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/tbj.12353.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Xing M, Xu S, Shen P. Effect of low-fat diet on breast cancer survival: a meta-analysis. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(3):1141–4. PMID: 24606431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sprandio J. Oncology patient-centered medical home and accountable cancer care. Commun Oncol. 7(12):565–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1548-5315(11)70537-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge the work of AONN+ staff on creating, dispatching, and collecting the responses of the survey titled Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Questionnaire in the spring of 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Novant Health Derrick L. Davis Cancer Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

    Sharon Gentry RN, MSN, ONN-CG, AOCN, CBCN

Authors
  1. Sharon Gentry RN, MSN, ONN-CG, AOCN, CBCN
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Gentry RN, MSN, ONN-CG, AOCN, CBCN .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

    Lillie D. Shockney

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gentry, S. (2018). The Role of Navigation Around Tumor Board Participation. In: Shockney, L. (eds) Team-Based Oncology Care: The Pivotal Role of Oncology Navigation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69038-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69038-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69037-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69038-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation