Advertisement

Principal Sources for the Identification of Tacit Knowledge Within an IT Company, as Part of an Intelligent System

  • Justyna Patalas-MaliszewskaEmail author
  • Irene Krebs
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 303)

Abstract

This article aims to present principal sources for the identification of tacit knowledge within an IT Company, as part of an intelligent system. It is stated, that knowledge workers have the specialised knowledge to come up with or formulate new ideas and that this specialised knowledge is the product of targeted education, experience and competences. Using our personnel usefulness function (Evaluation of Personnel as an Asset – EPS method), a base of knowledge workers, within an IT company is created and then, by using the FAHP method, the main sources of tacit knowledge (MTKS) from this base of knowledge workers are identified. Finally, the implementation of our approach in an information system is presented.

Keywords

Identification of tacit knowledge EPS method An intelligent system An IT company 

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, G.G., Zaheer, A.: Geography, networks, knowledge flows. Organ. Sci. 18(6), 955–972 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Belussi, F., McDonald F., Borrás, S.: Industrial districts: state of the art review. Research report, Project West–East id: Industrial districts re-location processes. Identifying policies in the perspective of the European Union enlargement. Report (2005). http://cordis.europa.eu/docs/publications/1001/100123911-6_en.pdf. Accessed 03 Nov 2016
  3. 3.
    Chen, C.J., Shih, H.A., Yang, S.Y.: The role of intellectual capital in knowledge transfer. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 56(3), 402–411 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davenport, T.H., Prusak, L.: Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1998)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Falkenberg, L., Woiceshyn, J., Karagianis, J.: Knowledge sourcing: internal or external? In: Competitiveness and Learning 5th International Conference (2003). http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/conf/olkc/archive/olk5/papers/paper16.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016
  6. 6.
    Haas, M.R., Cummings, J.N.: Barriers to knowledge seeking within MNC teams: which differences matter most? J. Int. Bus. Stud. 46, 36–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lev, B., Daum, J.: The dominance of intangible assets: consequences for enterprise management and corporate reporting. Measur. Bus. Excell. 8(1), 6–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris, S., Hammond, R., Snell, S.: A microfoundations approach to transnational capabilities: the role of knowledge search in an ever-changing world. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 45, 405–427 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H.: The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nydick, R.L., Hill, R.P.: Using the analytic hierarchy process to structure the supplier selection procedure. Int. J. Purch. Mater. Manag. 28(2), 31–36 (1992)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patalas-Maliszewska, J., Dudek, A.: A model of a tacit knowledge transformation for the service department in a manufacturing company: a case study. Found. Manag. Int. J. 8(1), 75–188 (2016)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Patalas-Maliszewska, J., Krebs, I.: A model of the tacit knowledge transfer support tool: CKnow-board. In: Dregvaite, G., Damasevicius, R. (eds.) ICIST 2016. CCIS, vol. 639, pp. 30–41. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46254-7_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Patalas-Maliszewska, J.: Knowledge Worker Management: Value Assessment, Methods, and Application Tools. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-36600-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peltokorpi, V., Vaara, E.: Knowledge transfer in multinational corporations: productive and counterproductive effects of language-sensitive recruitment. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 45, 600–622 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosen, B., Furst, S., Blackburn, R.: Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Org. Dyn. 36, 259–273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seidler-de Alwis, R., Hartmann, E.: The use of tacit knowledge within innovative companies: knowledge management in innovative enterprises. J. Knowl. Manag. 12(1), 133–147 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Singh, J.: Multinational firms and knowledge diffusion: evidence using patent citation data. Acad. Manag. Proc. 59(3), 649–680 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Zielona GóraZielona GóraPoland
  2. 2.Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-SenftenbergCottbusGermany

Personalised recommendations