Advertisement

Two Stage Business and IT-Alignment: Initial Experiences from Portal Implementation for Non-traditional Study Formats of a University

  • Kurt SandkuhlEmail author
  • Holger Lehmann
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 303)

Abstract

Business and IT-alignment (BITA) is a continuous process aiming at aligning strategic and operational objectives and ways to implement them between the business divisions of an organization and its information technology. The work presented in this paper focuses on a specific aspect of BITA: the process of creating an alignment between stakeholders in an organization and the IT. In a project aiming at the implementation of lifelong learning services, experiences were collected supporting a two stage BITA process. The organizational objective of the project was to offer tailor-made learning possibilities at university level to new, non-traditional target groups. New study formats allow to start studying at any stage of life and offer appropriate IT support for new target groups and study formats. The central technological idea consists in a context-oriented, information technology portal for e-learning, the MyKOSMOS portal, with an individualized and demand-based supply of information for the learners.

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work within the frame of the KOSMOS project presented in this contribution was funded by the BMBF and the ESF Programme of the EU.

References

  1. 1.
    Hepper, S., Hesmer, S.: Introducing the Portlet specification. Java World Journal (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jastram, S.: Analyse und Vergleich von Portal-Entwicklungstools am Beispiel des E-Learning. Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Wirtschaftsinformatik. Universität Rostock (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandkuhl, K.: Wissensportale. Informatik-Spektrum 28(3), 193–201 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coates, H., James, R., Baldwin, G.: A critical examination of the effects of learning management systems on university teaching and learning. Tert. Educ. Manag. 11, 19–36 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Watson, W.R., Watson, S.L.: What are learning management systems, what are they not, and what should they become? TechTrends 51(2), 29 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Atkins, D.: Revolutionizing science and engineering through cyberinfrastructure: Report of the National Science Foundation blue-ribbon advisory panel on cyberinfrastructure (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borchardt, U., Sandkuhl, K.: Wahrnehmung der Online-Unterstützung in der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung. In: KOSMOS (Hrsg.). Die Wahrnehmung der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung an der Universität Rostock. Eine qualitative Untersuchung der Studienformate Gartentherapie und Inklusive Hochbegabtenförderung (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sandkuhl, K., Stamer, D., Borchardt, U.: Portaleinsatz in der wissenschaftlichen Weiterbildung: Erfahrungen und Leitfaden. Universität Rostock, März (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ackermann, S.: Bildung von Nutzerprofilen aus dynamischen Nutzungsdaten im Lernportal des Kosmos Projektes. Masterarbeit im Studiengang Wirtschaftsinformatik. Universität Rostock (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weigel, T.: Joint editing support in academic further education – cloud linkage for myKosmos. Masterarbeit im Studiengang Wirtschaftsinformatik. Universität Rostock (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dillenbourg, P.: What do you mean by collaborative learning? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches, pp. 1–19 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Laal, M., Ghodsi, S.: Benefits of collaborative learning. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. 31(2012), 486–490 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wilson, J., Goodman, P., Cronin, M.: Group learning. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32(4), 1041–1059 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weigel, T.: Analyse und Konzeption des Identity Managements für Cloud Services am Beispiel iSM. Universität Rostock, Bachelorarbeit im Studiengang Wirtschaftsinformatik (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bellas, F.: Standards for second-generation portals. IEEE Internet Comput. 8, 54–60 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schelp, J., Winter, R.: Enterprise portals und enterprise application integration. HMD 225, 6–20 (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sandkuhl, K.: Information logistics in networked organizations: selected concepts and applications. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J., Cardoso, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2007. LNBIP, vol. 12, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88710-2_4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goldkuhl, G., Lind, M., Seigerroth, U.: Method integration: the need for a learning perspective. IEEE Softw. 145(4), 113–118 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lundqvist, M., Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Holmquist, E.: IDA User Guide - Handbook for Information Demand Analysis. Version 2.0. InfoFLOW project deliverable. Technical report. Jönköping University, Sweden (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seigerroth, U.: Enterprise modeling and enterprise architecture: the constituents of transformation and alignment of business and IT. IJITBAG 2(1), 16–34 (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Woitsch, R., Karagiannis, D., Plexousakis, D., Hinkelmann, K.: “Business and IT alignment: the IT-Socket”, e & i. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 126(7–8), 308–321 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Krogstie, J.: Model-Based Development and Evolution of Information Systems - A Quality Approach. Springer, London (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Business Information SystemsUniversity of RostockRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations