Skip to main content

Implementation Intentions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prospective Memory

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSCOGNIT))

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

An implementation intention is a self-regulatory strategy often used in prospective memory research to boost performance by creating a strong association between a to-be-encountered environmental stimulus (e.g., the door to exit one’s home) and an intended action (e.g., checking to be sure one has the keys). In this chapter, we examine the evidence for the purported automaticity of implementation intentions as well we discuss the extent to which encoding an implementation intention varies (e.g., they can be encoded verbally, through writing, and explicit use of imagery). This chapter concludes with an examination of the underlying mechanism of implementation intentions, and we describe a recent theory that employs a simulation-based account to explain the effectiveness of implementation intentions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, J. R. (1987). Skill acquisition: Compilation of weak-method problem solutions. Psychological Review, 94, 192–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. Unintended Thought, 3, 51–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayer, U. C., Achtziger, A., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2009). Responding to subliminal cues: Do if-then plans facilitate action preparation and initiation without conscious intent? Social Cognition, 27, 183–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chasteen, A. L., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2001). Implementation intentions and facilitation of prospective memory. Psychological Science, 12(6), 457–461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X.-J., Liu, L.-L., Cui, J.-F., Gan, M.-Y., Li, C.-Q., Neumann, D. L., et al. (2016). The effect and mechanisms of implementation intention in improving prospective memory performance in schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Research, 244, 86–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.-L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). The cost of remembering to remember: Cognitive load and implementation intentions influence ongoing task performance. In M. Kliegel, M. McDaniel, & G. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory: Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 367–390). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A.-L., Bayer, U. C., Jaudas, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2008). Self-regulatory strategy and executive control: implementation intentions modulate task switching and Simon task performance. Psychological Research, 72, 12–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crovitz, H. F., & Daniel, W. F. (1984). Measurements of everyday memory: Toward the prevention of forgetting. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22(5), 413–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exner, S. (1879). Physiologie der Grosshirnrinde. In L. Hermann (Ed.), Handbuch Der Physiologie [Handbook of psychology] (Vol. 2, pp. 189–350). Leipzig, Germany: Vogel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1993). Goal achievement: The role of intentions. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 141–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Brandstätter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996). Goal effects on action and cognition. Konstanz: Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). The role of goal setting and goal striving in medical adherence. In D. C. Park & L. L. Liu (Eds.), Medical adherence and aging: Social and cognitive perspectives (pp. 23–47). Washington, D. C: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38(4), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommel, B. (2000). The prepared reflex: Automaticity and control in stimulus response translation. In S. Monsell & J. Driver (Eds.), Attention and performance, 18: Control of cognitive processes (pp. 247–273). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex, 48(7), 805–825.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L. L., & Park, D. C. (2004). Aging and medical adherence: the use of automatic processes to achieve effortful things. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science, 1(4), 240–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., Cook, G. I., Hansen, J. S., & Pallos, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 861–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martiny-Huenger, T., Martiny, S. E., Parks-Stamm, E. J., Pfeiffer, E., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2017). From thought to action: A simulation account of action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 1513–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, S. M., Penningroth, S. L., & Radakovich, M. P. (2015). Implementation intentions forge a strong cue–response link and boost prospective memory performance. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27, 12–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.975816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1992). Aging and prospective memory: Basic findings and practical applications. Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, 7(87), 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., Howard, D. C., & Butler, K. M. (2008). Implementation intentions facilitate prospective memory under high attention demands. Memory & Cognition, 36(4), 716–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. (2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38(2), 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeks, J. T., & Marsh, R. L. (2010). Implementation intentions about nonfocal event-based prospective memory tasks. Psychological Research PRPF, 74(1), 82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meiran, N., Pereg, M., Kessler, Y., Cole, M. W., & Braver, T. S. (2015). The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus–response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 768–786.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. Cognitive Skills and Their Acquisition, 1, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, P., & Wrona-Clarke, A. (2016). Combining self-affirmation and implementation intentions to reduce heavy episodic drinking in university students. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 30(4), 434.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orbell, S., Hodgldns, S., & Sheeran, P. (1997). Implementation intentions and the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 945–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks-Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G. (2007). Action control by implementation intentions: Effective cue detection and efficient response initiation. Social Cognition, 25(2), 248–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestwich, A., Lawton, R., & Conner, M. (2003). The use of implementation intentions and the decision balance sheet in promoting exercise behavior. Psychology and Health, 18, 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scullin, M. K., Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition, 37(4), 425–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scullin, M. K., & McDaniel, M. A. (2010). Remembering to execute a goal: sleep on it! Psychological Science, 21(7), 1028–1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sohn, M. H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 130(4), 764–778.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uttl, B. (2008). Transparent Meta-Analysis of Prospective Memory and Aging. PLoS One, 3, e1568. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001568

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2007). How do implementation intentions promote goal attainment? A test of component processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2008). Mechanisms of implementation intention effects: the role of goal intentions, self-efficacy, and accessibility of plan components. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 373–395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1982). Symbolic self-completion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cohen, AL., Hicks, J.L. (2017). Implementation Intentions. In: Prospective Memory. SpringerBriefs in Psychology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68990-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics