Skip to main content

Landscape Analysis: The Electric Car (Is It a Viable Alternative?)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Infrastructure and Technology Management

Abstract

Cleaner air, renewable energy, and domestic energy use are the primary reasons to drive electric cars.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Davis, A. (2013, August 13). Here’s How Tesla’s model S compares to other top electric cars. Business insider [online]. Available: http://www.businessinsider.com/electric-car-comparison-chart-2013-8. Accessed 17 Nov 2014.

  2. ADFC energy. ZEV deployment support [online]. Available: http://www.afdc.energy.gov/laws/11081. Accessed 23 Nov 2014.

  3. Giffi, C., Vitale, J., Drew, M., Kuboshima, Y., & Sase, M. (2011). Unplugged: Electric vehicle realities versus consumer expectations, Deloitte.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kodjak, D. (2012). Consumer acceptance of electric vehicles in the US. The International council on clean transportation, Dec.

    Google Scholar 

  5. National Household Travel Survey. (2009). [Online]. Available: http://nhts.ornl.gov/2009/pub/stt.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.

  6. EV Charging Infrastructure Plan for Western Oregon. (2010, August). [Online]. Available http://www.theevproject.com/downloads/documents/Long%20Range%20EV%20Charging%20Infrastructure%20Plan%20for%20Western%20Oregon%20Ver%203.3.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.

  7. DC Fast charge effects on battery life and performance study – 50,000 Mile Update. (2014), 2, 29877.[Online] Idaho National Laboratory. Available http://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/07/f18/vss131_francfort_2014_o.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2014.

  8. Cet, T., Becker, T. A., Pi, I. S., & Tenderich, B. (2009). Electric vehicles in the United States a new model with forecasts to 2030.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Plugincars. Cars, plugincars.com, [Online]. Available: http://www.plugincars.com/cars. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  10. Honda. Pricing Options, automobiles.honda.com, [Online]. Available: http://automobiles.honda.com/civic-sedan/price.aspx?Model=FB2E5FEW. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  11. Thorstensen, L., & Libby, T. (2013). Creating the clean energy economy: Analysis of the electric vehicle. International Economic Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Electrification Coalition. (2013, July). EV market outlook: State of the plug-in electric vehicle market: EV market outlook.

    Google Scholar 

  13. US Department of Energy. (2012, May). Vehicle technologies program annual merit review.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bullis, K. (2012, November). How improved batteries will make electric vehicles competitive. MIT Technology Review.

    Google Scholar 

  15. US Department of Energy. (2011). 2011 annual progress report: Energy storage R&D.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trigg, T., & Telleen, P. (2013, April). Global EV outlook: Understanding the electric vehicle landscape to 2020. International Energy Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  17. EIA. Gasoline and diesel fuel update. eia.gov. [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/petroleum/gasdiesel/. Accessed 29 Nov 2014.

  18. EIA. Electric Power Monthly. eia.gov. [Online]. Available: http://www.eia.gov/electricity/monthly/epm_table_grapher.cfm?t=epmt_5_6_a. Accessed 29 Nov 2014.

  19. Nissan. 2015 Nissan Leaf. [Online]. Available: http://www.nissanusa.com/electric-cars/leaf/. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  20. Egbue, O. N. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of widespread electric vehicle adoption. Ph.D. dissertation, Missouri Univ. Of Science And Tech., Rolla, MO.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Edmunds.com. 2014 Nissan Leaf Hatchback Pricing. [Online]. Available: http://www.edmunds.com/nissan/leaf/2014/. Accessed 28 Nov 2014.

  22. Alexander, M., & Davis, M. (2013, June). Total cost of ownership model for current plug-in electric vehicles. EPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Becker, T. A., Sidhu, I., & Tenderich, B.. (2009, August). Electric vehicles in the United States: A new model with forecasts to 2030. Berkeley: Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Anair, D., & Mahmassani, A. (2012, June). State of charge: Electric vehicles’ global warming emissions and fuel-cost savings across the United States. Union of Concerned Scientists.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sahin, I., Rogers, F., Rogers, F., & Rogers, F. (2006). Detailed review of rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14–23.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Ásgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., & Stefansson, H. (2012). An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: A case study from Iceland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schellenberg, J. A., & Member, M. J. S. (2011). Electric vehicle forecast for a large west coast utility (pp. 1–6), published in Power and Energy Society General Meeting, 2011 IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vyas, C., & Hurst, D. (2012). Electric vehicle consumer survey consumer attitudes, opinions, and preferences for electric vehicles and EV charging stations. Available at http://www.navigantresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/EVCS-12-Executive-Summary.pdf.

  29. Garcia-Valle, R., & Pecas Lopes J. A. (Eds.). (2013). Electric vehicle integration into modern power networks. http://www.springer.com/978-1-4614-0133-9

  30. Deloitte. Unplugged: Electric vehicle realities versus consumer expectations. [Online] Available: http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-China/Local%20Assets/Documents/Industries/Manufacturing/cn_mfg_GlobalEVStudy_091011.pdf

  31. Cleantechnica. EV: Charging station infrastructure costs [Online]. Available: http://cleantechnica.com/2014/05/03/ev-charging-station-infrastructure-costs/

  32. Tesla motors, [Online]. Available: http://www.teslamotors.com

  33. National Research Foundation. Ultra-fast charging batteries that can be recharged in two minutes [Online]. Available http://www.nrf.gov.sg/scientific-advances/ultra-fast-charging-batteries-that-can-be-recharged-in-two-minutes-Public Utility Commission of Oregon, Order No. 12–013, 2012.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank John MacArthur, Research Associate at Portland State University, for answering our questions on battery electric vehicles and giving guidance for next steps in the early stage of the research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry Janzen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A

Comparison of acquisition cost of electric vehicles and Honda Civic LX

Vehicle name

Price ($)

EMW i3

42,300

Chevrolet Spark EV

27,500

Ford Focus Electric

36,000

Mitsubishi i-MiEV

23,800

Smart Electric Drive

25,700

Tesla Model S

81,000

Toyota RAV4 EV

50,700

Mercedes B-Class Electric Drive

42,400

Fiat 500e

32,600

Kia Soul EV

34,500

Tesla Model X

80,000

Volkswagen e-Golf

36,300

Nissan LEAF

29,800

Average EV cost (ex Tesla)

38,467

Honda Civic LX

18,490

Appendix B

The NHTS was originally the National Personal Transportation Survey (NPTS), which conducted its first survey of US transportation behavior in 1969. In 2000 the NPTS combined its survey efforts with American Travel Survey and changed the name to National Household Travel Survey. The 2009 NHTS included 150,000 households and 300,000 people representing a cross section of the USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Janzen, H., Kancherla, D.Y., Paneerselvam, S., Reddy, S.R., Daim, T.U. (2018). Landscape Analysis: The Electric Car (Is It a Viable Alternative?). In: Daim, T., Chan, L., Estep, J. (eds) Infrastructure and Technology Management. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68987-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics