Skip to main content

A Behavioral and Rational Investor Modeling to Explain Subprime Crisis: Multi Agent Systems Simulation in Artificial Financial Markets

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Decision Aid Using Multiple Criteria

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to explain the financial crisis via the investors’ psychological behavior and rational reasoning. We specifically focus on three main biases: overconfidence, loss aversion and mimetic behavior.

We propose a new conceptual model of financial decision-making representing the stock market dynamics during the crisis period. We construct an artificial financial market that has two types of investors: institutional and individual. The latter are classified into two groups: the noise traders and the mimetic investors.

A simple experimentation of our model is elaborated to simulate the behavior of the investors during the different phases of a crisis: the formation and the break-up of the speculative bubble. We conclude that the interaction between rational and irrational behavior and the investor’s psychology must be considered in the explanation of financial crises, overconfidence and loss aversion are two behavioral biases very relevant to explain the formation and bursting of bubbles. Finally, mimetic behavior amplifies disturbances in the financial market and limits arbitrage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbes, M. B. (2012). Does overconfidence bias explain volatility during the global financial crisis? Transition Studies Review, 19(3), 291–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alfarano, S. Lux, T. & Wagner, F. (2010). Excess volatility and herding in an artificial financial market: Analytical approach and estimation. MPRA_paper_24719.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Huang, M., & Santos, T. (2001). Prospect theory and asset prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 1–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broihanne, M. H., Merli, M., & Roger, P. (2014). Overconfidence, risk perception and the risk-taking behavior of finance professionals. Finance Research Letters, 11(2), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, W., & Lee, B. (2006). An empirical evaluation of then overconfidence hypothesis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 2489–2515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, K., Hirshleifer, D., & Subrahmanyam, A. (1998). Investor psychology and security market under- and overreactions. Journal of Finance, 53(6), 1839–1885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bondt, W., & Thaler, R. (1985). Does the stock market overreact. Journal of Finance, 40(3), 793–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demyanyk, Y., & Hemert, O. V. (2011). Understanding the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24(6), 1848–1880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterwood, J. C., Stacey, R., & Nutt, S. R. (1999). Inefficiency in analysts’ earnings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? Journal of Finance, 54(5), 1777–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. R. (1999). Herding among investment newsletters: Theory and evidence. Journal of Finance, 54(1), 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshleifer, D., Subrahmanyam, A., & Titman, S. (1994). Security analysis and trading patterns when some investors receive information before others. Journal of Finance, 49(5), 1665–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A., Post, T., & Pennings, J. (2013). Individual investor perceptions and behavior during the financial crisis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(1), 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. O. I., WJager, W., & von Eije, J. H. (2007). Social simulation of stock markets: Taking it to the next level. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 10(2), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk by. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouwenberg, R., & Zwinkels, R. C. J. (2015). Endogenous price bubbles in a multi-agent system of the housing market. PLoS One, 10(6), e0129070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitin, A., & Wachter, S. (2012). Explaining the housing bubble. Georgetown Law Journal, 100, 1177–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mah-Hui, M. L. (2008). Old wine in new bottles: Subprime mortgage crisis - causes and consequences. Journal of Applied Research in Accounting and Finance, 3(1), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzan, S., & Westerhoff, F. (2005). Representativeness of news and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 29(4), 677–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odean, T. (1998). Are investors reluctant to realize their losses? Journal of Finance, 53(5), 1775–1798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odean, T., & Gervais, S. (2001). Learning to be overconfident. Review of Financial Studies, 30, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rekik, Y., Hachicha, W., & Boujelbene, Y. (2014). Agent-based modeling and investors’ behavior explanation of asset. Procedia Economics and Finance, 13, 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfstein, D., & Stein, J. (1990). Herd behavior and investment. American Economic Review, 80(3), 465–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, H. (2002). Beyond greed and fear: Understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shefrin, A., & Statman, M. (2011). Behavioral finance in the financial crisis: Market efficiency, Minsky and Keynes. Working paper, Santa Clara University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., Summer, L., & Waldmann, R. (1990). Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal of Political Economics, 98, 703–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statman, M. (2011). Efficient Markets in Crisis. Journal of Investment Management, 9(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisue, S., & Wilensky, U. (2004, May 16–21). NetLogo: A simple environment for modeling complexity. The International Conference on Complex Systems, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwiebel, J. (1995). Corporate conservatism and relative compensation. Journal of Political Economy, 103(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosra Ben Said .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Said, Y.B., Kanzari, D., Bezzine, M. (2018). A Behavioral and Rational Investor Modeling to Explain Subprime Crisis: Multi Agent Systems Simulation in Artificial Financial Markets. In: Masri, H., Pérez-Gladish, B., Zopounidis, C. (eds) Financial Decision Aid Using Multiple Criteria. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68876-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics