Skip to main content

PET/CT with [18F]FDG in Cervical Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Imaging in Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Imaging with [18F]FDG-PET/CT is not routinely used for the initial diagnosis of cervical cancer although the primary tumor is generally [18F]FDG avid, because of the lack of precise anatomic information which limits its clinical utility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chung HH, Nam BH, Kim JW, Kang KW, Park NH, Song YS, Chung JK, Kang SB (2010) Preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT maximum standardized uptake value predicts recurrence of uterine cervical cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37:1467–1473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rahman T, Tsujikawa T, Yamamoto M et al (2016) Different prognostic implications of 18F-FDG PET between histological subtypes in patients with cervical cancer. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e3017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Haie-Meder C, Mazeron R, Magne N (2010) Clinical evidence on PET-CT for radiation therapy planning in cervix and endometrial cancers. Radiother Oncol 96:351–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Petsuksiri J, Jaishuen A, Pattaranutaporn P, Chansilpa Y (2012) Advanced imaging applications for locally advanced cervical cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 13:1713–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon MS, Ahn SJ, Nah BS, Chung WK, Song HC, Yoo SW, Song JY, Jeong JU, Nam TK (2012) Metabolic response of lymph nodes immediately after RT is related with survival outcome of patients with pelvic node-positive cervical cancer using consecutive [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 84:e491–e497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin WC, Hung YC, Yeh LS, Kao CH, Yen RF, Shen YY (2003) Usefulness of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to detect para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis in advanced cervical cancer with negative computed tomography findings. Gynecol Oncol 89:73–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yeh LS, Hung YC, Shen YY, Kao CH, Lin CC, Lee CC (2002) Detecting para-aortic lymph nodal metastasis by positron emission tomography of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in advanced cervical cancer with negative magnetic resonance imaging findings. Oncol Rep 9:1289–1292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grigsby PW (2005) 4th international cervical cancer conference: update on PET and cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 99(3 suppl 1):S173–S175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sugawara Y, Eisbruch A, Kosuda S, Recker BE, Kison PV, Wahl RL (1999) Evaluation of FDG PET in patients with cervical cancer. J Nucl Med 40:1125–1131

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS et al (2006) Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study. Cancer 106:914–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Havrilesky LJ, Kulasingam SL, Matchar DB, Myers ER (2005) FDG-PET for management of cervical and ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 97:183–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SK, Choi HJ, Park SY et al (2009) Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 45:2103–2109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi HJ, Ju W, Myung SK, Kim Y (2010) Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta- analysis. Cancer Sci 101:1471–1479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Loft A, Berthelsen AK, Roed H, Ottosen C, Lundvall L, Knudsen J, Nedergaard L, Højgaard L, Engelholm SA (2007) The diagnostic value of PET/CT scanning in patients with cervical cancer: a prospective study. Gynecol Oncol 106:29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yildirim Y, Sehirali S, Avci ME, Yilmaz C, Ertopcu K, Tinar S, Duman Y, Sayhan S (2008) Integrated PET/CT for the evaluation of para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer patients with negative conventional CT findings. Gynecol Oncol 108:154–159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. American College of Radiology (2010) ACR appropriateness criteria. Women’s imaging: staging of invasive cancer of the cervix. http://www.acr.org/. Accessed 20 Mar 2010

  17. Kizer NT, Zighelboim I, Case AS, Dewdney SB, Thaker PH, Massad LS (2009) The role of PET/CT in the management of patients with cervical cancer: practice patterns of the members of the society of gynecologic oncologists. Gynecol Oncol 114:310–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kunos C, Radivoyevitch T, Abdul-Karim FW, Faulhaber P (2011) 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography standard uptake value ratio as an indicator of cervical cancer chemoradiation therapeutic response. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoch G, Freudenberg LS, Beyer T, Bockisch A, Debatin JF (2004) To enhance or not to enhance? 18F-FDG and CT contrast agents in dual-modality 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med 45(suppl 1):56S–65S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Veldt AA, Buist MR, van Baal MW, Comans EF, Hoekstra OS, Molthoff CF (2008) Clarifying the diagnosis of clinically suspected recurrence of cervical cancer: impact of 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl Med 49:1936–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chung HH, Jo H, Kang WJ et al (2007) Clinical impact of integrated PET/CT on the management of suspected cervical cancer recurrence. Gynecol Oncol 104:529–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Domeki Y, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2008) Performance of FDG- PET/CT for diagnosis of recurrent uterine cervical cancer. Eur Radiol 18:2040–2047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sironi S, Picchio M, Landoni C, Galimberti S, Signorelli M, Bettinardi V et al (2007) Post-therapy surveillance of patients with uterine cancers: value of integrated FDG PET/CT in the detection of recurrence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 34:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kidd EA, Thomas M, Siegel BA et al (2013) Changes in cervical cancer FDG uptake during chemoradiation and association with response. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 85:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mittra E, El-Maghraby T, Rodriguez CA, Quon A, McDougall IR, Gambhir SS, Iagaru A (2009) Efficacy of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with recurrent cervical carcinoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36:1952–1959

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jover R, Lourido D, Gonzalez C, Rojo A, Gorospe L, Alfonso JM (2008) Role of PET/CT in the evaluation of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 110(3 suppl 2):S55–S59

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis E. Datseris .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skoura, E.V., Datseris, I.E. (2018). PET/CT with [18F]FDG in Cervical Cancer. In: Gouliamos, A., Andreou, J., Kosmidis, P. (eds) Imaging in Clinical Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68873-2_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68872-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68873-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics