Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transaction Cost Theory and Business Legitimacy

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Handbook of Business Legitimacy

Abstract

The importance of business legitimacy is continuously increasing. Beyond economic interests, companies are incorporating social responsibility and human rights management on both a voluntary and an obligatory basis, thereby strengthening their legitimacy. From a scientific perspective, there is potential for further research to combine economic theory and the concept of business legitimacy. The following discussion aims to develop an approach in this direction, presenting literature from the fields of business legitimacy as well as transaction cost theory and integrating these. Three different levels (the institutional, the organizational, and the individual) are observed in this context. The discussion indicates that business legitimacy particularly impacts transaction costs in a positive and negative way. A possible mechanism for gaining legitimacy and reducing transaction costs is a stakeholder advisory board in combination with a values management system. In this emergent field for research, these findings can be further developed and discussed in the context of various situations. In practice, it is important to consider stakeholders’ norms and values when conducting transactions. When organizations are increasingly likely to undertake sovereign tasks, or when legal enforcement is weak, especially in a global context, the legitimacy of organizations’ transactions becomes relevant. The clear distinction between legitimacy, which is determined by ethical expectations, and legality, which refers to public regulation, is of paramount importance in this discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. Am Econ Rev 62(5):777–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth BE, Gibbs BW (1990) The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organ Sci 1(2):177–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann-Pauly D (2017) Managing corporate legitimacy: a toolkit. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Becerra M (2009) Theory of the firm for strategic management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beetham D (2013) The legitimation of power of power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beisheim M, Dingwerth K (2008) Procedural legitimacy and private transnational governance. Are the good ones doing better? SFB-Governance working paper series, no. 14. German Research Foundation (DFG), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitektine A, Haack P (2015) The “macro” and the “micro” of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Acad Manag Rev 40(1):49–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Business Ethics (1998) Values management system. Standard & guidance document. Zentrum für Wirtschaftsethik gGmbH. Wissenschaftliches Institut des Deutschen Netzwerk Wirtschaftsethik – EBEN Deutschland e. V., Weingarten

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1932) The problem of correlating law, economics, and ethics. Wis Law Rev 8:3–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1934) Institutional economics: its place in political economy [Reprint: 1990]. Transaction Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons JR (1950) The economics of collective action. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook KS, Hardin R, Levi M (2005) Cooperation without trust? Russell Sage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dacin MT, Oliver C, Roy J-P (2007) The legitimacy of strategic alliances: an institutional perspective. Strateg Manag J 28(2):169–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dariot D, Nascimento LF (2008) Search for a theory linking environment and society. In: Wilks S (ed) Seeking environmental justice. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  • David RJ, Han S-K (2004) A systematic assessment of the empirical support for transaction cost economics. Strateg Manag J 25(1):39–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse D, Suchman M (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: Greenwood R, Oliver C, Sahlin-Andersson K, Suddaby R (eds) Handbook of organizational institutionalism. Sage, London, pp 49–77

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Díez-De-Castro E, Peris-Ortiz M (eds) (2018) Organizational legitimacy. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling J, Pfeffer J (1975) Organizational legitimacy: social values and organizational behavior. Pac Sociol Rev 18(1):122–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebers M, Gotsch W (2006) Institutionenökonomische Theorien der Organisation. In: Kieser A, Ebers M (eds) Organisations theorien, 6th edn. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 247–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Agency problems and residual claims. J Law Econ 26(2):327–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun CJ (1996) Reputation: realizing value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Freiling J (2013) On the Firm’s Raison d’Être and Competence-based Nature of the Firm. In: Kersten W, Wittmann J (eds) Kompetenz, Interdisziplinarität und Komplexität in der Betriebswirtschaftslehre. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 29–38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Fernandez-Stark K (2016) Global value chain analysis: a primer, 2nd edn. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness (CGGC), Duke University, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons R, Roberts J (eds) (2013) The handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart OD, Holmström BR (1987) The theory of contracts. In: Bewley TF (ed) Advances in economic theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 71–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Hearit KM (1995) “Mistakes were made”: organizations, apologia, and crises of social legitimacy. Commun Stud 46(1–2):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hybels RC (1995) On legitimacy, legitimation, and organizations: a critical review and integrative theoretical model. Acad Manag Proc 1995(1):241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson D, Turner C (2003) International business: themes and issues in the modern global economy. Routledge, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan SE, Ruland RG (1991) Positive theory, rationality and accounting regulation. Crit Perspect Account 2(4):361–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzmueller M, Shimshack J (2012) Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. J Econ Lit 50(1):51–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar R, Das TK (2011) Interpartner legitimacy in strategic alliances. In: Das TK (ed) Behavioral perspectives on strategic alliances. IAP, Charlotte, NC, pp 301–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Park S, Bao R (2019) The transition from relation-based to rule-based governance in East Asia: Theories, evidence, and challenges. International Journal of Emerging Markets 14(1):171–186. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJoEM-10-2016-0287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1986) The autopoiesis of social systems. In: Geyer F, Van der Zeuwen J (eds) Sociocybernetic paradoxes: observation, control and evolution of self-steering systems. Sage, London, pp 172–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR (1974) The many futures of contracts. South Calif Law Rev 47:691–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR (1978) Contracts: adjustment of long-term economic relations under classical, neoclassical, and relational contract law. Northwest Univ Law Rev 72:854–905

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR (1987) Relational contract theory as sociology: a reply to professors Lindenberg and de Vos. J Inst Theor Econ 143(2):272–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneil IR (2000) Contracting worlds and essential contract theory. Soc Leg Stud 9(3):431–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Micklethwait J, Wooldridge A (2005) The company. Orion Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo G, Scherer AG (2006) Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: a communicative framework. J Bus Ethics 66(1):71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons T (1960) Structure and process in modern societies. Free Press, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Heath PS (1996) The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Acad Manag Rev 21(2):492–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Wang DYL, Jiang Y (2008) An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies. J Int Bus Stud 39(5):920–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng MW, Sun SL, Pinkham B, Chen H (2009) The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad Manag Perspect 23(3):63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1961) Organizational prestige: some functions and dysfunctions. Am J Sociol 66(4): 335–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1981) Normal accident at three Mile Island. Society 18(5):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao H (1994) The social construction of reputation: certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strateg Manag J 15(S1):29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rendtorff JD (2009) Responsibility, ethics and legitimacy of corporations. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer AG, Palazzo G (2007) Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1096–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manag Rev 20(3):571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tadelis S, Williamson OE (2013) Transaction cost economics. In: Gibbons R, Roberts J (eds) Handbook of organizational economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 159–189

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tilling MV (2004) Some thoughts on legitimacy theory in social and environmental accounting. Commerce Research Paper Series No. 04–6. Finders University

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilling MV (2010) Some thoughts on legitimacy theory in social and environmental accounting. Social Environ Account J 24(2):3–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang EWK (2006) Behavioral assumptions and theory development: the case of transaction cost economics. Strateg Manag J 27(11):999–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidaver-Cohen D, Brønn PS (2008) Corporate citizenship and managerial motivation: implications for business legitimacy. Bus Soc Rev 113(4):441–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J, Weber K, Margolis JD (2003) Social issues and management: our lost cause found. J Manag 29(6):859–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren RC (2003) The evolution of business legitimacy. Eur Bus Rev 15(3):153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wengler S (2005) Key account management in business-to-business markets: An assessment of its economic value. Deutscher Universitätsverlag, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2003) Standards and audits for ethics management systems: the European perspective. Springer, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2005) Corporate governance, values management, and standards: a European perspective. Bus Soc 44(1):74–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2014) Governance ethics: global value creation, economic organization and normativity. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2017a) Relationale Führung und Intersektorale Governance. In: Lehmann M, Tyrell M (eds) Komplexe Freiheit: Wie ist Demokratie möglich? Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 237–258

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (ed) (2017b) Creating shared value – concepts, experience, criticism. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland J (2018) Relational Economics. Ökonomische Theorie der Governance wirtschaftlicher Transaktionen. Metropolis, Marburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1979) Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ 22(2):233–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Sociol 87(3):548–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1983) Credible commitments: using hostages to support exchange. Am Econ Rev 73(4):519–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, market, relational contracting. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1991) Comparative economic organization: the analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Adm Sci Q 36(2):269–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (2005) Transaction cost economics. In: Menard C, Shirley MM (eds) Handbook of new institutional economics. Springer US, New York, pp 41–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman MA, Zeitz GJ (2002) Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Acad Manag Rev 27(3):414–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leadership Excellence Institute Zeppelin (LEIZ), Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen, Germany

    Josef Wieland & Dominik Fischer

Authors
  1. Josef Wieland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dominik Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominik Fischer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark

    Jacob Dahl Rendtorff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Wieland, J., Fischer, D. (2020). Transaction Cost Theory and Business Legitimacy. In: Rendtorff, J. (eds) Handbook of Business Legitimacy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_14-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_14-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-68845-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Transaction Cost Theory and Business Legitimacy
    Published:
    13 April 2020

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_14-3

  2. Transaction Cost Theory and Business Legitimacy
    Published:
    14 October 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_14-2

  3. Original

    Transaction Cost Theory and Business Legitimacy
    Published:
    11 March 2019

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68845-9_14-1

Search

Navigation