Skip to main content

Olmsted’s Public Parks: Civic-Spirited Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Shaping American Democracy
  • 356 Accesses

Abstract

Olmsted expressed alarm over increasing social segregation in America and its loss of civic spirit and fraternity. To address these problems, Olmsted’s park designs sought to promote communal belonging and to provide spaces for rejuvenation, yielding personal as well as civic benefits. Whether the ambitious goals Olmsted set for his parks could be fully achieved, this chapter claims, is doubtful. Social science research questions whether social contact alone can turn strangers into acquaintances or inspire coordinated action. Also unconvincing is Olmsted’s claim that park beauty would have a positive “moral” impact on visitors. Though Olmsted may have over sold the benefits of his parks, he was a fierce and public-spirited advocate for creating and preserving aesthetically pleasing spaces for all, not just the few.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is unclear, for example, why in Olmstead’s “fourth stage” national identity would not give rise to actions motivated primarily by patriotism—a motive broader and more encompassing than the “narrow…domestic and local” incentives that he says define this stage. Jean Piaget (1896–1980) developed a four-stage theory of cognitive development; Lawrence Kohlberg (1927–1987) further refined Piaget’s model—resulting in a six-stage theory.

  2. 2.

    With the ascendance of the Tweed Ring, most positions were filled by patronage appointments; as a result, keepers’ professionalism and moral commitment waned. Vandalism and crime spiked. Finally, in 1872, in the wake of the Tweed machine’s demise, Olmsted was asked to reorganize the Keepers (Olmsted 1997c, 307). In his 1873 reorganization plan, Olmsted introduced the “round system” in which “patrol-keepers” would dutifully walk their beats—watching for disturbances and, interestingly, providing accountability for the “post-keepers” who were stationed at gates and other key locations (1997c, 281).

  3. 3.

    In 1860, for example, 55 Keepers in Central Park made 228 arrests, half of which were for mere violations of park ordinances (e.g. using indecent language, throwing stones, defacing property, picking flowers or walking on the grass). Drunkenness and disorderly conduct made up another third (Taylor 1999, 444).

References

  • Addams, J. (2002). The Objective Value of a Social Settlement. In J. B. Elshtain (Ed.), The Jane Addams Reader. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, B. (1980). The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1997). The Proper Study of Mankind: An Anthology of Essays. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, C., & Rocheleau, P. (1995). Frederick Law Olmsted: Designing the American Landscape. New York: Rizzoli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmar, E., & Rosenzweig, R. (1992). The Park and the People: A Concise History of Central Park. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodgget, G. (1976). Frederick Law Olmsted: Landscape Architecture as Conservative Reform. Journal of American History, 62(4), 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. (1998). Civility: Manners, Morals and the Etiquette of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. (2000). Theories of Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., Plater-Zyberk, E., & Speck, J. (2000). Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. (2002). Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, C. R. (2007). Binding Problems, Boundary Problems: The Trouble with Democratic Citizenship. In S. Benhabib, I. Shapiro, & D. Petranovic (Eds.), Identities, Affiliations, and Allegiances. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1993). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalfus, M. (1990). Frederick Law Olmsted: The Passion of a Public Artist. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1985). Idea for a Universal History with Cosmopolitan Intent. In H. Reiss (Ed.), Kant’s Political Writings. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (2004). Brave New Neighborhoods: The Privatization of Public Space. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (2011). Public Space in the Progressive Era. In C. R. Hayward & T. Swanstrom (Eds.), Justice and the American Metropolis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunstler, J. H. (1993). The Geography of Nowhere: The Rise and Decline of America’s Man-Made Landscape. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louv, R. (2005). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature Deficit Disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, S. (2003). Behind the Gates: Life, Security and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, W. C. (1974). The Idea of Fraternity in America. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia: Homeowner Associations and the Rise of Residential Private Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, L. (1971). The Brown Decades: A Study of the Arts in America, 1865–1895. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, E., & Wong, J. (2003). Intergroup Prejudice in Multiethnic Settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47(4), 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1990a). Notes on the Pioneer Condition. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), The California Frontier, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 5). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1990b). Preliminary Report Upon the Yosemite and Big Tree Grove. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), The California Frontier, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 5). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1997a). A Consideration of the Justifying Value of a Public Park. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), Writings on Public Parks, Parkways, and Park Systems, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1997b). Address to the Prospect Park Scientific Association. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), Writings on Public Parks, Parkways, and Park Systems, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1997c). General Order for the Organization and Routine of Duty of the Keepers’ Service of the Central Park. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), Writings on Public Parks, Parkways, and Park Systems, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1997d). “Park” from the American Cyclopedia of 1875. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), Writings on Public Parks, Parkways, and Park Systems, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 5). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olmsted, F. L. (1997e). Parks and the Enlargement of Towns. In C. E. Beveridge & C. F. Hoffman (Eds.), Writings on Public Parks, Parkways, and Park Systems, Papers of Frederick Law Olmsted (Vol. 1). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. (1998). Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski, W. (2003). A Clearing in the Distance: Frederick Law Olmsted and America in the Nineteenth Century. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigelman, L., & Welch, S. (1993). The Contract Hypothesis Revisited: Black–White Interaction and Positive Racial Attitudes. Social Forces, 71(3), 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spirn, A. W. (1996). Constructing Nature: The Legacy of Frederick Law Olmsted. In W. Cronon (Ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. E. (1999). Central Park as a Model for Social Control: Urban Parks, Social Class and Leisure Behavior in Nineteenth-Century America. Journal of Leisure Research, 31(4), 420–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, F. J. (1996). The Frontier in American History. New York: Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, N. M. (2000). At Home with Nature, Effects of Greenness on Children’s Cognitive Functioning. Environment and Behavior, 32(6), 775–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. (1993). The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roulier, S.M. (2018). Olmsted’s Public Parks: Civic-Spirited Design. In: Shaping American Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68810-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics