Skip to main content

European Collaboration in the Development of New Weapon Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy

Part of the book series: Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management ((ITKM))

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is threefold: firstly, to offer a historical profile of Europe’s arms industrial collaborative experience; secondly, to evaluate the process and impact of major European collaborative programs, especially with regard to research and development (R&D); and, thirdly, to explore the contemporary status of collaborative effort in the light of recent EU policy initiatives, including the 2009 European Procurement Directive and the contemporary pressures and challenges that have forged the shape and direction of the EU’s Horizon 2020 Defence Research Programme. In this regard, the Commission’s underlying thematic is to evolve the European defense industrial base into a single common entity. Arms collaboration is viewed as a transformative device in this process, promoting cross-border engagement, enhancing military-related standardization and fostering economies of scale and industrial and technological rationalization. The chapter will analyze progress toward these goals, advancing our understanding of the topic through empirical assessment of the collaborative model’s contribution to the sustainability and enhancement of European defense R&D in a post-BREXIT environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In October 1975 the European Commission submitted to the Council of Ministers what it called the ‘Action Programme for the European Aeronautical Sector’, Communication R /2461/75. The main proposal of the action program was the proposal for the creation of a common policy in the civil aircraft and aviation sector, supplemented by a draft resolution on the establishment of an EEC military procurement agency. See Hansard 1978.

  2. 2.

    This is similar wording to Article 296. See Commission of the European Communities (2006).

  3. 3.

    3For a more detailed discussion, see Matthews and Ansari (2015) and also Matthews (2014).

  4. 4.

    Defense offset can take several forms, but in the context of licensed production, it is categorized as direct offset. This is where a country procuring defense equipment demands that the offshore vendor transfers technology to enable local production to take place. See Matthews (2014: 85).

  5. 5.

    Australia’s model is based on flexibility and partnership, with offshore vendor investment targeted on prioritizing domestic industrial capabilities.

  6. 6.

    Interview, anonymous Royal Navy officer working on the ACA program, 5 May 2017.

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Ibid.

  9. 9.

    Interview with Rolls-Royce executives, January 2000. Cited in Matthews (2001: 79).

References

  • Batey A (2016) UK to earn billions on F-35 work. Aviation Week (9 July 2016.) http://aviationweek.com/shownews/uk-earn-billions-f-35-work

  • Butler LRA (2017) Transatlantic DEFENCE PROCUrement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (2006) ‘Interpretative communication on the application of article 296 of the treaty in the field of defence procurement’. COM(2006) 779 final, 7 December 2006

    Google Scholar 

  • De Briganti G (2016) Eurofighter face hard decisions on production, damages as orders run out. 10 October 2016. http://www.defense-aerospace.com/articles-view/feature/5/177740/eurofighter-four-face-hard-decisions-on-production%2C-damages-as-orders-run-out.html

  • Defence Aerospace (2017) Nations hand off A400M talks to OCCAR, 8 March 2017, Defense-Aerospace.com

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpech JL (1976) Le Standardization des armements. Revue de defense Nationale 5(May 1976):19–35

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVore M (2014) International armaments collaboration and the limits of reform. Def Peace Econ J 25(4):415–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EDA (2016) Research and Technology Strategy https://www.eda.europa.eu/what-we-do/eda-priorities/strategies/ResearchandTechnology. Accessed 13 June 2017

  • Eur-Lex (2013) Commission Staff Working Document on Defence Accompanying the document Communication Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52013SC0279

  • Eurofighter Typhoon (2016) http://www.madeinpreston.co.uk/Aviation/typhoon.html. Accessed 13 June 2017

  • Fiott D (2016) Europe and the Pentagon’s third offset strategy. RUSI 161(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government Expenditure on Defence (2016) Eurostat. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Government_expenditure_on_defence. Accessed 14 Dec 2016

  • Hansard (1978) European Community (civil aircraft), HC Deb 23 January 1978 vol. 942 cc1109-41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley K (1983) NATO arms collaboration. Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley K (2011) The economics of defence policy. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuninckx B (2008) A primer to collaborative defence procurement in Europe: troubles, achievements and prospects. Public Procurement Law Rev 17(3):1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuninckx B (2017) The law of collaborative defence procurement in the European Union. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Howard M, Miemczyk J (2011) Supply management in naval defence. In: Caldwell N, Howard M (eds) Procuring complex performance – studies of innovation in product service management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly E (2016) Why the EU needs to start spending on Defence R&D, Sciencebusiness. https://wwwgooglecouk/?gfe_rd=cr&ei=1ltRWIjlGZL38AeljrKIAw&gws_rd=ssl#q=E+Kelly%2C+Why+the+EU+Needs+to+Start+Spending+on+Defence+R%26D. Accessed 13 Dec 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane D (2002) The EU armaments co-operation. Centre for European Reform, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepsch E (1979) Future arms procurement: the Klepsch report – USA-Europe arms procurement. Brasseys

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (1992) European armaments collaboration: policy, problems and prospects. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (2001) International arms collaboration: the case of Eurofighter. Int J Aerospace Manag 1(1):65–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R (2014) The UK offset model: from participation to engagement, RUSI Whitehall report 1-14, August 2014: 85

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews R, Ansari I (2015) Economic orthodoxy v market pragmatism: a case study of Europe’s ‘abandonment’ of defense offset. Public Financ Manag J 15(4):378–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro M, Thoma K (2016) The future of EU defence research. Directorate-General for External Policies. Policy Department, European Parliament

    Google Scholar 

  • National Audit Office (NAO) (1995) Eurofighter 2000. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OCCAR (2017) What Does OCCAR Do? (March 2017). http://www.occar.int/186

  • Odell M, Eaglesham J (2003) Carrier building has cost £100m. The Financial Times, 28 January 1976

    Google Scholar 

  • PanEuropeanNetworks (2017) EU to Boost Joint Military Acquisition

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowntree T (2014) Speech, Director OCCAR, at the UK Defence Forum, February 2014. http://wwwoccarint/media/raw/20140206_Feb_14_v7_12_point_final_Defence_Forum_Script_webpdf. Accessed 13 June 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley J, Pearton M (1972) The international trade in arms. IISS: 75. Original source: (1967) Arms trade and foreign policy. Staff study prepared for the Council on Foreign Relations. US Senate. Washington Government Printing Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Tindemans L (1976) Report on the European Union, Bulletin of the European Communities, 1/16

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Amsterdam (1997) 10 November 1997, 1997/ C 340/01

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Lisbon (2007) 13 December 2007, 2007/C 306/01

    Google Scholar 

  • Treaty of Rome (1957) 25 March 1957

    Google Scholar 

  • Trybus M (2014) Buying defence and security in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UK Ministry of Defence (1995) The Eurofighter 2000 Programme. NATO Report

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Ministry of Defence (2012) National Security through Technology, MoD white paper CM8278

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ron Matthews .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matthews, R. (2018). European Collaboration in the Development of New Weapon Systems. In: Karampekios, N., Oikonomou, I., Carayannis, E. (eds) The Emergence of EU Defense Research Policy. Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68807-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics