Skip to main content

Civil Society Discourses on Poverty and Social Exclusion During the Greek Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Socioeconomic Fragmentation and Exclusion in Greece under the Crisis

Abstract

How is poverty discursively constituted, both as a category of thinking and as a label applied to particular social categories in times of austerity? How is it linked to social exclusion? Based on extensive fieldwork with representatives from 79 typical non-governmental organizations and informal initiatives of civil society in two Greek cities (Athens and Patras, in the periphery), this chapter explores the link between crisis, poverty and social exclusion. In their attempt to underline the marginalizing effects of austerity in Greece, civil society actors question previous assumptions about what constitutes poverty and exclusion in Greek society and offer important insights into the seemingly disparate practices and experiences among those classified as “poor” or “new excluded”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To use Habermas’s words, ‘to conceive of a process as a crisis is tacitly to give it a normative meaning—the resolution of the crisis affects a liberation of the subject caught up in it’ (1975, 1–2).

  2. 2.

    The primary document families-files (79 interviews each averaging seven pages) allowed us to group our data in eight categories. Memos have been added in order to capture some insights, but owing to the great number of comments, it was not possible to connect the memos directly to the data, and they were then linked to codes. The codes were grouped in three categories: (1) NGOs’ and emerging organizations’ codes, (2) argumentation patterns of civil society codes and (3) linguistic strategies’ codes. Each comment was designated as a quotation, and the codes were attached to the quotations. Finally, the visual representations of data (codes and quotations) have been used in order to explore connections in discourse analysis.

  3. 3.

    Typical NGOs are characterized by a minimum of formalization, recognition and institutionalization by the state and have a legal status, whereas informal groups are self-governed collective actions or movements.

  4. 4.

    Many researchers are tempted to follow Sen’s theory, promoting a conceptualization that takes into account the specific needs and desires of people. However, these needs are not absolute and they are defined with difficulty in times of crisis. Our approach attempts to be objective, not relying on subjectivity and individual capabilities . We argue that in period of crisis, where emergency issues exist, prompt responses at a global level must be given regarding inequalities.

  5. 5.

    Public schools and universities in Greece are free and there are no tuition fees. The teaching of foreign languages is included yet is considered by the majority of the Greek parents to be unsatisfactory, a fact that explains the widespread operation of private foreign-language teaching centres.

Bibliography

  • Bank of Greece. 2016. Economic Bulletin No. 43. Athens: Bank of Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broch-Due, Vigdis. 1995. Poverty Paradoxes: The Economy of Engendered Needs. The Nordic Africa Institute Poverty & Prosperity Occasional Paper Series, No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2006. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? CSI Working Papers Series 005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2004. Joint Report by the Commission and the Council on Social Exclusion. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economou, Charalampos, Daphne Kaitelidou, Dimitris Katsikas, Olga Siskou, and Maria Zafiropoulou. 2014. Impacts of the Economic Crisis on Access to Healthcare Services in Greece with a Focus on the Vulnerable Groups of the Population. Social Cohesion and Development 9 (2): 99–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter, Suzanne Bronheim, John Bynner, Stephan Klasen, Phyllis Magrab, and Stewart Ranson. 2000. Social Exclusion and Children: Creating Identity Capital. In Combating Social Exclusion Through Education, ed. Guido Walraven, Carl Parsons, Dolf van Veen, and Chris Day, 1–21. Leuven: Garant Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, C., and J.B. Figueiredo. 1997. Social Exclusion and Anti-Poverty Policy: A Debate. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies, ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Maia. 2006. Representing Poverty and Attacking Representations: Perspectives on Poverty from Social Anthropology. Q-Squared Working Paper No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Daniel Martin. 2012. Cultural Proximity: Crisis, Time and Social Memory in Central Greece. History and Anthropology 23 (3): 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. History, Time, and Economic Crisis in Central Greece. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Daniel Martin, and Charles Stewart. 2015. Ethnographies of Austerity: Temporality, Crisis and Affect in Southern Europe. History and Anthropology 27 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livanos, Ilias. 2010. The Wage–Local Unemployment Relationship in a Highly Regulated Labour Market: Greece. Regional Studies 44 (4): 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narostsky, Suzana, and Niko Besnier. 2014. Crisis, Value and Hope: Rethinking the Economy. Current Anthropology 55 (9): S4–S16.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Connor, Alice. 2001. Poverty Knowledge: Social Science, Social Policy and the Poor in Twentieth Century U.S. History. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2011. Strong Performers and Successful Reformers in Education: Education Policy Advice for Greece. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos, Philip, Marianne E. Page, and Ann Huff Stevens. 2006. The Intergenerational Effects of Compulsory Schooling. Journal of Labor Economics 24 (4): 729–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou, Despina, Constantinos Dimoulas, and Maria Symeonaki. 2014. National Report on the Labour Market Position of Vulnerable Groups in Greece. Athens: Panteion University of Social and Political Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2014. Are We Violating the Human Rights of the World’s Poor? Responses to Four Critics. Yale Human Rights and Development Journal 17: 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1982. The Basic Liberties and Their Priorities. In The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, ed. S. McMurrin, vol. 3. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riza, Elena, Maria Chrysi, Dennis Vaidakis, Anastasios Angelou, Michalis Kontos, and Emmanouil Pikoulis. 2017. Does Socio-economic Status in Greece Affect Participation in Cancer Screening Programmes during the Period of Financial Crisis? Journal of Public Health 25 (4): 417–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodokanakis, Stavros, and Vasileios A. Vlachos. 2012. Measuring the Unemployment Risk in Northern Greece from the LFS Micro-data during the Period 1994–2006. Review of Economic Analysis 4 (2): 224–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roitman, Janet. 2011. Crisis: What is at Stake. Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon. http://www.politicalconcepts.org/issue1/crisis/.

  • ———. 2014. Anti-crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri-Laderchi, Caterina, Ruthi Saith, and Frances Stewart. 2003. Does it Matter that We Do Not Agree on the Definition of Poverty? A Comparison of Four Approaches. Oxford Development Studies 31 (3): 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, Marshall. 1985. Islands of History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salpigktidis, Ilias I., Dimitrios Paliouras, Apostolos S. Gogakos, Thomas Rallis, Nicolaos C. Schizas, Fotios Chatzinikolaou, Dimitrios Niakas, Pavlos Sarafis, Panagiotis Bamidis, Achilleas Lazopoulos, et al. 2016. Burnout Syndrome and Job Satisfaction in Greek Residents: Exploring Differences between Trainees Inside and Outside the Country. Annals of Transnational Medicine 4 (22): 444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya K. 1981. Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skroumpelos, Anastasios, Elpida Pavi, Katerina Mylona, and John Kyriopoulos. 2014. The Impact of Economic Crisis on Chronic Patients’ Self-Rated Health, Health Expenditures and Health Services Utilization. Diseases 2 (2): 93–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sökefeld, Martin. 2006. Mobilizing in a Transnational Space, A Social Movement Approach to the Formation of Diaspora. Global Networks 6 (3): 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigh, Henrik. 2008. Crisis and Chronicity: Anthropological Perspectives on Continuous Conflict and Decline. Ethnos 73 (1): 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Jonathan, Edward Lamb, and Eliana Zur-Szpiro. 2015. A Philosophical Review of Poverty. Joseph Rowntree Foundation Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafiropoulou, Maria. 2014. Exclusion from Healthcare Services and the Emergence of New Stakeholders and Vulnerable Groups in Times of Economic Crisis: A Civil Society’s Perspective in Greece. Social Change Review 12 (2): 141–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafiropoulou, Maria, Perez, Alejandro, Christodoulopoulou, Archontia, Peeva, Radina, and Marini, Ioanna. 2017. Winners and Losers of the Greek Crisis as a Result of a Double Fragmentation and Exclusion: A Discourse Analysis of Greek Civil Society. In GreeSE: Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe, Vol. 119, December 2017.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zafiropoulou, M., Theodosiou, A., Pérez, A. (2018). Civil Society Discourses on Poverty and Social Exclusion During the Greek Crisis. In: Katsikas, D., Sotiropoulos, D., Zafiropoulou, M. (eds) Socioeconomic Fragmentation and Exclusion in Greece under the Crisis. New Perspectives on South-East Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68798-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics